Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Why is history kinder to Mongols than to Nazis?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Cyrus Shahmiri View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
King of Kings

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Iran
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6240
  Quote Cyrus Shahmiri Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Why is history kinder to Mongols than to Nazis?
    Posted: 24-Jun-2013 at 15:21
Originally posted by Auggie

I have to wonder if the current Iranian-Israeli state of affairs has something to do with all this. It just may be that a natural reaction to decades-long Israeli bullying and hegemony in the region is the root cause of the supposed Iranian obsession with German national socialism. 
 
I do know that several years back Iran hosted an international conference on the Holocaust  and whether or not it occurred as presented in the "official", never to be questioned, etched in granite version given us by Jewry and the survivors of the so-called death camps of eastern Poland. Naturally, regarding the conference, we here in the US heard nothing whatsoever of the details, what was actually discussed. Rather, our "impartial" news media informed/indoctrinated us that those no-good Holocaust deniers, the Iranians, were hosting one.  
 
In the recent years, unfortunately what you said is one of reasons but the fact is that Nazis were always respected by Iranians mainly because Iranian/Aryan nationalism, you can read about this thing here: http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/nazi-germany-and-persia-iran/blog-258353/
 
Advocating the common Aryan ancestry of 'the two Nations.' In 1936 then, the Reich Cabinet issued a special decree exempting Iranians from the restrictions of the Nuremberg Racial Laws on the grounds that they were 'pure blooded Aryans' (Lenczowski. 1944, p. 160). And in 1939, the Nazis provided Persians with what they called a German Scientific Library. The library contained over 7.500 books carefully selected "to convince lranian readers...of the kinship between the National Socialist Reich and the "Aryan culture" of Iran" (Lenczowski. 1944, p. 161). In various pro-Nazi publications, lectures, speeches, and ceremonies, parallels were drawn between the Shah of Iran and Hitler, and praise the charisma and virtue of the Fuhrerprinzip (Rezun. 1982, p. 29).
 
Hitler became a national hero of Iranians and all so-called 'oppressed Aryan peoples. For instance, a journal titled "Nameh-ye Iran-e Bastan" (the Journal of Ancient Iran) identified Hitler as "one of the greatest men in the world": Adolph Hitler, this great scholarly man of the Aryan race, has destroyed a 200-years old plan of the Jews against nationality in the world, against nationalism, and particularly the Aryan races on earth...and has created a new day for the new world.
Back to Top
Ollios View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 22-Feb-2011
Location: Diyar-ı Rum
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1130
  Quote Ollios Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Jun-2013 at 16:24
Originally posted by Cyrus Shahmiri

In the recent years, unfortunately what you said is one of reasons but the fact is that Nazis were always respected by Iranians mainly because Iranian/Aryan nationalism, you can read about this thing here: http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/nazi-germany-and-persia-iran/blog-258353/

That's is quite normal. Even countries which occupied by Nazis and faced huge collapses as a result of Nazi Invasion, have many Nazi supporters just because of Aryan theories. Example: Russia and Greece

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_(Greece) What is left from those days in Greece? 




  
Back to Top
Auggie View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 08-Apr-2010
Location: Florida, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 14
  Quote Auggie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Jun-2013 at 10:43
All well said and done, Cyrus, but of your nation's past and present infatuation with Hitlerite Germany, has it occurred to you  that had it not been for what's happened in the past few decades in the region (and still is today) all such interest in national socialism may have waned by this point? Have current relations between Iran and Israel done anything at all to reverse the situation? My bet is that if peace should one day settle on the region all such distasteful ideologies -- both fascist and zionist -- will die a slow and agonizing death. Unfortunately I don't foresee a peaceful resolution to the problem, and I believe it will all end very badly; winner take all.
Where it is a duty to worship the sun it is sure to be a crime to examine the laws of heat.
- Voltaire
Back to Top
yomud View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar
Inactive

Joined: 04-Oct-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 399
  Quote yomud Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Jun-2013 at 11:47
Originally posted by Auggie

I believe it will all end very badly; winner take all.
idk who you are but it seem we understand each other well
yomud are free people
Back to Top
Cyrus Shahmiri View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
King of Kings

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Iran
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6240
  Quote Cyrus Shahmiri Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Jun-2013 at 13:31
Originally posted by Auggie

All well said and done, Cyrus, but of your nation's past and present infatuation with Hitlerite Germany, has it occurred to you  that had it not been for what's happened in the past few decades in the region (and still is today) all such interest in national socialism may have waned by this point? Have current relations between Iran and Israel done anything at all to reverse the situation? My bet is that if peace should one day settle on the region all such distasteful ideologies -- both fascist and zionist -- will die a slow and agonizing death. Unfortunately I don't foresee a peaceful resolution to the problem, and I believe it will all end very badly; winner take all.
 
Some days ago Israel's president Shimon Peres said some interesting things about a possible relation between Iran and Israel: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/10125968/Shimon-Peres-Israel-and-Iran-could-negotiate.html
 
One of the interesting things that he said was that he called the greatest Iranian king, Cyrus the Great, as the first Zionist in the world, of course I think he just refers to tolerance and religious freedom in the Iranian culture, as you probably know, Iran has already the largest Jewish population in the Middle East after Israel, in fact Iranians and Jews have lived in this region peacefully for thousands of years, the only danger is religious bigotry, unfortunately in the last decades, the worst possible thing has happened in Iran and a religious government has come to power, this is the only reason that we see this relation between Iran and Israel.
 
Anyway I just hope Islamism dies, nothing else!
Back to Top
Auggie View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 08-Apr-2010
Location: Florida, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 14
  Quote Auggie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Jun-2013 at 14:02
Originally posted by Cyrus Shahmiri

Originally posted by Auggie

 
Some days ago Israel's president Shimon Peres said some interesting things about a possible relation between Iran and Israel: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/10125968/Shimon-Peres-Israel-and-Iran-could-negotiate.html
 
One of the interesting things that he said was that he called the greatest Iranian king, Cyrus the Great, as the first Zionist in the world, of course I think he just refers to tolerance and religious freedom in the Iranian culture, as you probably know, Iran has already the largest Jewish population in the Middle East after Israel, in fact Iranians and Jews have lived in this region peacefully for thousands of years, the only danger is religious bigotry, unfortunately in the last decades, the worst possible thing has happened in Iran and a religious government has come to power, this is the only reason that we see this relation between Iran and Israel.
 
Anyway I just hope Islamism dies, nothing else!
I'm not at all sure that Islamism can die without Zionism dying right alongside it; or, at bare minimum,  the more zealous supporters of the latter putting a muzzle on it.

Edited by Auggie - 25-Jun-2013 at 14:04
Where it is a duty to worship the sun it is sure to be a crime to examine the laws of heat.
- Voltaire
Back to Top
Cyrus Shahmiri View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
King of Kings

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Iran
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6240
  Quote Cyrus Shahmiri Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Jun-2013 at 15:18
Originally posted by Auggie

I'm not at all sure that Islamism can die without Zionism dying right alongside it; or, at bare minimum,  the more zealous supporters of the latter putting a muzzle on it.
 
Death of Zionism won't change anything, this liberation movement has achieved its goal by forming a strong Jewish state named Israel.
Back to Top
Auggie View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 08-Apr-2010
Location: Florida, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 14
  Quote Auggie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Jun-2013 at 11:26
Originally posted by Cyrus Shahmiri

Originally posted by Auggie

 
 
Death of Zionism won't change anything, this liberation movement has achieved its goal by forming a strong Jewish state named Israel.
It sure has achieved its original goal of founding a Jewish state, no argument there. But today's Zionism is more political  than religious in nature; it's taken on a whole new meaning and has become, essentially, a form of militant Judaism. Moreover, its supporters  (along with the ultra-orthodox) are some of the most enthusiastic of those behind the colonization program in Palestine, the seemingly endless building of Jewish settlements in territory which they have absolutely no right to. 
Where it is a duty to worship the sun it is sure to be a crime to examine the laws of heat.
- Voltaire
Back to Top
Cyrus Shahmiri View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
King of Kings

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Iran
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6240
  Quote Cyrus Shahmiri Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Jun-2013 at 13:15
Originally posted by Auggie

It sure has achieved its original goal of founding a Jewish state, no argument there. But today's Zionism is more political  than religious in nature; it's taken on a whole new meaning and has become, essentially, a form of militant Judaism. Moreover, its supporters  (along with the ultra-orthodox) are some of the most enthusiastic of those behind the colonization program in Palestine, the seemingly endless building of Jewish settlements in territory which they have absolutely no right to. 
 
There has never been any country named Palestine, and hopefully this country won't be formed as long as Islamist terrorists rule there, Jews have full right to build everything everywhere in their motherland.
 
Arabs had also occupied some parts of Iran for a long time, some hundreds years ago, a liberation movement, similar to Zionism, happened in Khorasan, without this movement there would be probably an Arab state in the east of Iran named Khorasan, but there are already just a few Khorasani Arab villages in this region, I had talked about one of them in this thread: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?tid=2018 
Back to Top
Ollios View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 22-Feb-2011
Location: Diyar-ı Rum
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1130
  Quote Ollios Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Jun-2013 at 16:00
Originally posted by Auggie

I believe it will all end very badly; winner take all.

Completly true and it won't be a solution. İf winner take all instead of justice, that very bad end will be just a reason of next badx2 problem

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Really Cyrus, again. I can't stop to think that is there any possibility that gamma-ray which comes from a secret nuclear plant in Iran, was effected you. You seem to turn someone like HULK Wink 

Originally posted by Cyrus Shahmiri

 
There has never been any country named Palestine

Name of Palestine is very old and is there a rule somthing like that, if you want to be country, there should be a country with same name in the past. 

Originally posted by Cyrus Shahmiri

 
 Jews have full right to build everything everywhere in their motherland.

*There is a Jew history, before Levant/Palestine/Judea. Their homeland is not Levant. It is Iraq

*if you really believe this idea, please use it for every nation on world. 
Back to Top
Cyrus Shahmiri View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
King of Kings

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Iran
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6240
  Quote Cyrus Shahmiri Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Jun-2013 at 06:43

It is better to talk about these things in a proper topic, however I have talked about them in hundreds topics, Arabs have to forget some lands that they have lost after a long occupation, some decades ago Saddam with support of almost all Arab countries wanted to recapture Khuzestan of Iran, some million Iranians and Iraqi were killed but he couldn't do it, of course we never forget Israeli help, especially in Operation Opera that we worked together against Saddam: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Opera

The name of Palestine has nothing to do with Arabs, this ancient name can never help them, if Arabs want to continue their fight against Israel, this name, like Babylon and Sumer, wil be found just in the historical books in the near future. 


Edited by Cyrus Shahmiri - 27-Jun-2013 at 06:48
Back to Top
Ollios View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 22-Feb-2011
Location: Diyar-ı Rum
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1130
  Quote Ollios Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Jun-2013 at 11:26
Originally posted by Cyrus Shahmiri

It is better to talk about these things in a proper topic, however I have talked about them in hundreds topics, Arabs have to forget some lands that they have lost after a long occupation, some decades ago Saddam with support of almost all Arab countries wanted to recapture Khuzestan of Iran, some million Iranians and Iraqi were killed but he couldn't do it, of course we never forget Israeli help, especially in Operation Opera that we worked together against Saddam: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Opera

The name of Palestine has nothing to do with Arabs, this ancient name can never help them, if Arabs want to continue their fight against Israel, this name, like Babylon and Sumer, wil be found just in the historical books in the near future. 

About Iran-Iraq War, sorry for my short knowledge. I was just born in that time Wink(summer of 1988) but I am curious.

1-What about Arabs in Iran? They are Shia but have they ever organised for military attack or been included rebel movement as Kurds did (PJAK)? Are they happy in Iran as Jews?

"Iranian Jews blast offer of cash for immigrating to Israel" (2007)


Iran should be proud of Jews in Iran. Well done for them Clap


2-What was Turkish position in Iraq-Iran War? (according to Iranian sources)

3-Iraq has small coast line but it is too important for oil export so attacking Iran and Kuwait is understandable in military perspective. In read something which about before Saddam attacks, on net. Shah in Iran wanted Iraq's side of shatt al arab which had left Iraq with aggrement in 1937. That's why diplomatic relation cut off in 1970. After a new aggrement, island problems came in 1971. 

Are these true? It seems like a Iranian provocation. If Iran and Kuwait don't let Iraq reach the sea. I can see the future of region; it will be bloody again.

Back to Top
Cyrus Shahmiri View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
King of Kings

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Iran
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6240
  Quote Cyrus Shahmiri Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Jun-2013 at 14:48
Originally posted by Ollios

About Iran-Iraq War, sorry for my short knowledge. I was just born in that time Wink(summer of 1988) but I am curious.

1-What about Arabs in Iran? They are Shia but have they ever organised for military attack or been included rebel movement as Kurds did (PJAK)? Are they happy in Iran as Jews?
 
Arabs have their own cities and villages in Iran, especially in Khuzestan, about Iran-Iraq war, Saddam certainly thought Arabs of Iran would support him, but Iranian Arabs strongly stood against Iraqis and surprisingly showed their loyalty to Iran, of course there can be different reasons for it, I think one of main reasons was that they could preserve their own culture in Iran with the least problems. After war, one of these Arabs, named Ali Shamkhani, became the Minister of Defense in Iran.
 
It can't be denied that there have been always also some Arab separatist movements in Iran, especially those who are called Alahwazi, anyway some people with any ethnicity who are majority in a region think that they can have a better situation in a separate state!

2-What was Turkish position in Iraq-Iran War? (according to Iranian sources)
 
Turks had really a positive role, they didn't support any side but they helped both sides to end this conflict, of course in the last years of this war when Kurds of Iraq supported Iran in fight against Saddam and Iranians could capture some parts of northern Iraq, Turks reached an agreement with Saddam to enter the northern parts of Iraq for repressing Kurds.
 
3-Iraq has small coast line but it is too important for oil export so attacking Iran and Kuwait is understandable in military perspective. In read something which about before Saddam attacks, on net. Shah in Iran wanted Iraq's side of shatt al arab which had left Iraq with aggrement in 1937. That's why diplomatic relation cut off in 1970. After a new aggrement, island problems came in 1971. 

Are these true? It seems like a Iranian provocation. If Iran and Kuwait don't let Iraq reach the sea. I can see the future of region; it will be bloody again.

 
In the Middle East, these conflicts have always existed and still exist for different purposes, it is clear that capturing Khuzestan of Iran and Kuwait by Saddam, could also provide numerous economic benefits for Iraq.
Back to Top
yomud View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar
Inactive

Joined: 04-Oct-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 399
  Quote yomud Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Jun-2013 at 19:10
Originally posted by Ollios

About Iran-Iraq War, sorry for my short knowledge. I was just born in that time Wink(summer of 1988) but I am curious.
even b4 iran - iraq war shah's support of iraqi kurds make saddam angry when saddam give what the shah wants reza pahlavai stop supporting the iraqi kurds he leave them with saddam alone but after revolution khomeini wanted to export it's revolution and u know jerusalem road cross from karbala both side send their agent to sabotage each others country until iraq start the damn war saddam torn a part the paper he sign with shah and he demand khomeni to not recognize the pact he made with shah

Originally posted by Ollios

What about Arabs in Iran? They are Shia but have they ever organised for military attack or been included rebel movement as Kurds did (PJAK)


 if u want know story about ethnics rebellion  we will need make new topic but here's little info about whats happen on that days  we was in civil war with all means but when iraq attacks iranian civil wars ended and saddam become main target for all peoples 



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1979_Khuzestan_uprising
arabs start rebellion   and even they took iranian embassy in london

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1979_Kurdish_rebellion_in_Iran

when shah gone and  Revolution wins  almost all the ethnic declares war with persians u know "half of Iran" was in rebellion turkmens kurds arabs balouchs was 4 major ethnics and their wars are famous  in iran the first people who start the war was kurd people very soon after war started in kurdestian it starts in  turkmensahar too and than it's taks all the north with mazeruni people and Gelik people ( gelik and mazeruni communist separatist rebellion in giland and mazandaran are not famous ) azeri turks play key role in crashing ethnics rebellion they forge turk-persian shia alliance . after turks allied with persians gelik abandoned they rights and no fight take in there place mazerunis communist separatist start little fight against persians but when azeris come to persians side they choose the winner side and agreed to enter war against turkmens for show their loyalty can you imagen it ?? former separatist now fighting against turkmens who even didn't want fedural goverment but just thier right full farms (which pahlavi take it  ) and right of mother language keeping traditional dance cloth music wine culture in among the turkmen we dont have  same   hijab which persians have
which all gone now Angry

turkmens hold greatest ethnic army ( about 9000 b4 second war) we was   last man standing after they defeat kurds arab balouchs   and only ethnic who able to defeat turkopersian shia army .  in first war we win and they accept our terms of pace they said they will give our right but they broke it when they finish thier job with other ethnics they start  second war they win while their chieftain tanks open fire on our city leave the city with flame . later president banisadr call tanks action "just showing 10% of power "

Originally posted by Ollios

2-What was Turkish position in Iraq-Iran War? (according to Iranian sources)
in iran media they dont  say anything about turkey but they their media is full about how all arab world united against iran and still they win the war Dead ( they accept the pace before they lose the war ) the real story is this war is taboo cuz it's full of thier mistakes and we must accpet what they saying not what the fact was !!!!!!!!!!!!!! iran take back all their lands in 3th years of war and saddam wanted to make pace but they refuse and keep fight for next 5 years and they accept the pace b4 they lose the war 


Edited by yomud - 27-Jun-2013 at 19:29
yomud are free people
Back to Top
lionmaster View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 08-Jul-2010
Location: UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 95
  Quote lionmaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Dec-2013 at 06:29

 
because Mongols succeeded, and Nazis were losers, as simple as that :)




Edited by lionmaster - 12-Dec-2013 at 07:27
Back to Top
toyomotor View Drop Down
Baron
Baron

BANNED TROLL

Joined: 25-Dec-2013
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 387
  Quote toyomotor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Dec-2013 at 23:57
Shamsir: Please explain why history should treat the Nazis with anything than outrage, based on the atrocities carried out during WW2?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.