Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Ottoman perceptions of the Americas

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567
Author
DreamWeaver View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel

Suspended

Joined: 02-May-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 555
  Quote DreamWeaver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Ottoman perceptions of the Americas
    Posted: 08-May-2010 at 13:07
The regions of direct control, effective control and areas of influence of course widely vary.
Back to Top
Muha View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 07-May-2010
Location: Bosnia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4
  Quote Muha Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-May-2010 at 20:44
Originally posted by TheGreatSimba

Muha, what you are not considering is the growing European presence in the Indian Ocean, the Safavid presence in Iran, and the fact that the trip from the Persian Gulf to the America's would be far too long, much more hazardous, and simply not feasible economically.

Also, there is no evidence that the Chinese sailed ships that big and wooden ships of that size would not be sea worthy. Furthermore, assuming the Ottomans sailed to China, could they convince the Chinese to give up their ship building technology? It would take decades for the Ottomans to simply build just one of these ships and train a crew to sail it, let alone enough to ship a massive army from the Persian Gulf all the way to the America's like you suggest.

Colonialism was simply impossible for the Ottomans. As you mentioned, sailing through the Mediterranean was out of the question, but attempting a colonization effort of the America's from the Persian Gulf is simply absurd.

@Cyrus: Maps such as the one above usually depict the empires at their greatest extent. The Ottomans probably did not control all of that territory for very long or at any one time or probably just had a minimal presence.
Zhengh HE and admiral of fleet was in comand of 183 of those ships and he was a muslim and he would aid ottomans in exchange for technology, its like today giving some tanks and get back a nuke a good deal as we could say
the indian ocean wasnt dominated by europeans as you say, man we are talking 1400;s the armor and sword is still the main weapons, and they arent gonna sail all the way from spain in caravel to reach indonesia, as there is better trade route on the west now, and a lot closer.
also ottomans would on the way probably discover australia and establish a supply collony, similar to what dutch did on cape of good hope, it proved a great bussines and a trade post as the treasures from new world are being moved to istanbul
Back to Top
TheGreatSimba View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain


Joined: 22-Nov-2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1152
  Quote TheGreatSimba Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-May-2010 at 10:22
Originally posted by Muha

Zhengh HE and admiral of fleet was in comand of 183 of those ships and he was a muslim and he would aid ottomans in exchange for technology, its like today giving some tanks and get back a nuke a good deal as we could say


First of all, the Chinese were the most technologically advanced nation of the time, what would they need the Ottomans for? Secondly, your assumption that "Zheng He was Muslim, the Ottomans were Muslim, so they'll help each other out" is ridiculous. Its more likely they would have fought each other after Zheng He demanded that the Ottoman sultan praise the Chinese Emperor, which was a huge part of his mission (his task was to intimidate and awe different kingdoms and empires into becoming Chinese client kingdoms, and later to show them the might of the Chinese Empire, Zheng He had an army of 28,000 men with him).

Originally posted by Muha


the indian ocean wasnt dominated by europeans as you say, man we are talking 1400;s the armor and sword is still the main weapons, and they arent gonna sail all the way from spain in caravel to reach indonesia, as there is better trade route on the west now, and a lot closer.


What? Also, forget the Europeans, there were countless kingdoms that the Ottomans would have to deal with on their way to the America's through the Indian and Pacific Oceans, including pirates.

Originally posted by Muha


also ottomans would on the way probably discover australia and establish a supply collony, similar to what dutch did on cape of good hope, it proved a great bussines and a trade post as the treasures from new world are being moved to istanbul


Do you know where Australia is? How would the Ottomans discover Australia on their way to the America's? A trip to Australia, then to the America's would make their journey even farther. Australia would also be a hard place to colonize.

Your assumptions are simply devoid of geographical and historical realities.
Back to Top
Kanas_Krumesis View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 24-Dec-2009
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 326
  Quote Kanas_Krumesis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-May-2010 at 13:24
 Muha is an ordinary blind fan of Ottoman empire from Bosnia. First of all Zheng He expedition and expeditions of European sea powers from 15-16 century had mainly explore, trade and even scientific goal, than conquest. After some intelligence Europeans conquered one lands, in other just opened trade posts (like in India till 18th century). Ottomans are just a pirates out of Mediterranean sea and nothing more. In 1627 some Turkish pirates with base in Morocco (Barbary coast) attacked Iceland and kidnapped as slave members of local comunity. This is the farthest operation of Turkish ship ever known in Atlantic, but with help of European renegade capitan. Fleet of Ottoman empire was place of every adventurer and acquisitive European seaman (often aristocrats) who want to make a money. In Indian ocean Ottomans used knowledge and know-how of Arab sailers, but they were pushed early from there by Portuguese ( 1509- Battle of Diu). 
 This big guns are not a big job. With this big shells is quite difficult to complete cannon. At least in the battle. On the other hand this guns weren`t very effective on middle and far distance. Small and flexible weapon or ship is better than big and clumsy. Sea battles show this fact many times.
Back to Top
opuslola View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
suspended

Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
  Quote opuslola Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-May-2010 at 16:28
TGS wrote, a while ago;

"Colonialism was simply impossible for the Ottomans. As you mentioned, sailing through the Mediterranean was out of the question, but attempting a colonization effort of the America's from the Persian Gulf is simply absurd."

I would respectfully argue that it was or would indeed, have been possible!

Have you every sailed thru the gap between the Med. and the Atlantic? It is not a "narrow" gap, as we see on maps today!

To get a fleet out of the Med. into the Atlantic, is not really as diffucult as you might think, especially before "radar!"

Heck, Amercian ships were, like those of every nation, often attacked and taken by Pirates base upon the African coast, even into the 19th century CE!

But, large fleets were not attacked, just small single or maybe three ships were targeted by these pirates at one time, and this was when all of the navies of England, France, Spain, etc., were trying to avoid just such an occurance!


But, "free-booters", were then as now, easy to man and act! It was these pirate bands that chose and picked the targets of opportunity!

Look, the English would try to attack the French or Spanish, the French or Spanish would retort, and the Dutch (maybe the origin of the Barbary Pirates), all of them!

So, considering the original of the posts on this particular site, are supposed to be following the "original" rules, then one might well consider that the Ottomans, which once were considered as the rulers of the Med. area, and an Empire which then actually had bases of support on the African coast, at least, would have been in an excellent position to go forward into the Atlantic, and place large bases upon the N.African / Atlantic coast! Now, if we can suppose that their still ramained on the Spanish coast a cadre' of pro-Islam supporters, then they would have been able to assist in the movement of man-power and ships out of the Med. into the Atlantic.

But, first, we should try to still recognize that "Salt" was still a major commodity during these times! And, of course, along with Salt was Seafood! And, believe it or not, seafood, and especially "salted sea-food" was still a commodity very much in demand during the times of the 12th-18th centuries CE! The very period which saw the real development of the Ottoman Empire!

But, I am writing way too much, and most of you, it seems, are only devoted to retorts of one or three paragraphs! Aaaaagggg!

Still, concerning America, I feel that the Ottomans, the leadership of wich was much more "democratic" than the "religious" leaders, who/whom it seems to me, were somewhat a "quiet background" to the real powers, which seems able to ignore religious problems, whenever the need arose!

Thus, if as the early posts here propose, this Empire ever desired the propagation of it'self to the Americas would have had a good chance of success, since so little of it was really under the control of any other European nobility, etc.! And, by marriage,etc., the Ottmans had just as good a claim to these lands as any of their cousins! Especially since they did not have to bow to Rome in any manner!

Enter the Native American, being exposed to Ottomans!

I don't know just how many paintings or depictions any of you have seen of the head-wear or head-dresses worn by Ottoman officials, but they were to some extent, at least later in time, very similar to those worn by out same depictions of Native American head wear! That is, plumes of feathers, etc.!

All Ottoman leaders, it seems, from the time of the Crusader conquest of Constantinople, were either not yet Islamized or they were realists!

That is it seems they were, like so many others in those days, easily bought as Mercenaries! They were, it seems, easily worked into Christian armies as needed!

Now, to consider any Ottoman moves towards the New World, and considering the original restrictions posted here, then a Ottoman conquest and founding of an Ottoman/Othman outpost in the New World, is not an impossibilty, considering that at one time the Ottoman navy ruled the Med.!

And, if the Ottoman dignataries wore those same feather headresses, then they might well have found that the locals, (who we are told also wore such devices) might have found them at arms length with fellows?

And, since only a few of the older respondants on this site, actually mentioned the ability of the Ottomans and other Islamic tribes, to become involved in the "slave trade" then the availibility of hundreds of thousands of potential slaves, in the New World, might have been an impossible opportunity to resist?

But, I will desist from posting more!

Regards,
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.105 seconds.