Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Why did the English...?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Why did the English...?
    Posted: 16-Aug-2006 at 11:27
Why did the English move large hordes of Irish to their colonies, when they were essentially enemies..

Edited by rider - 16-Aug-2006 at 14:57
Back to Top
Paul View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
AE Immoderator

Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
  Quote Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Aug-2006 at 12:44
Not sure what you are refering to.
 
As far as I know Britain didn't move large numbers of Irish to the colonies, unless you count regiments..... However a large number of Irish migrated of their own free will to escape poverty... Unless youy mean the Irish that went to Australia with a ball and chain around their ankle and a stripy suit.
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk
Back to Top
rider View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4664
  Quote rider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Aug-2006 at 14:56
Originally posted by Paul

As far as I know Britain didn't move large numbers of Irish to the colonies, unless you count regiments
 
Indeed, a good one... lol
 
 
Back to Top
Croppy Boy View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 14-Aug-2006
Location: Ireland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote Croppy Boy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Aug-2006 at 20:23
Don't forget the number that Cromwell shipped off to Barbados as slaves...

Cromwell, father of democracy and proponent of the white slave trade... Confused
All along that singing river that black mass of men was seen
High above their shining weapons flew their own beloved green
Death to every foe and traitor! Whistle out the marching tune!
Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Aug-2006 at 07:31
Whoever said Cromwell was the father of democracy?
 
He's still England's only dictator (despite all Blair's best efforts Thumbs Down). In fact his order 'take away that bauble', referring to the mace that symbolises Parliament's authority, is so famous purely because he was anti-democratic.
 
PS If the Irish and the English were generally enemies, how come so many Irish voluntarily served in the British army, many of them heroically, and at least two of the most famous British generals - Wellington and Montgomery - were Irish?
 
166 of the 1,351 winners of the Victoria Cross, Britain's highest award for gallantry, are known to be Irish. There are others with Irish names, and others thought to be born to Irish parents outside Ireland.


Edited by gcle2003 - 17-Aug-2006 at 07:39
Back to Top
Peter III View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jul-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 159
  Quote Peter III Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Aug-2006 at 11:05
despite all Blair's best efforts
 
LOL
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Aug-2006 at 15:10
Originally posted by gcle2003

PS If the Irish and the English were generally enemies, how come so many Irish voluntarily served in the British army, many of them heroically, and at least two of the most famous British generals - Wellington and Montgomery - were Irish?
 
Montgomery was not Irish, he was of Anglo-Norman ancestry. and most notably, he served in the British Army, not the Irish Army...
Back to Top
Paul View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
AE Immoderator

Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
  Quote Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Aug-2006 at 16:16
And you're not German, you are of African ancestry.
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Aug-2006 at 16:20

only if you believe in Darwinism... ;)

Back to Top
Timotheus View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 15-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 478
  Quote Timotheus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Aug-2006 at 01:06
Originally posted by Croppy Boy

Don't forget the number that Cromwell shipped off to Barbados as slaves...

Cromwell, father of democracy and proponent of the white slave trade... Confused


Not to mention the Scots Covenanters, who were basically Calvinists just like him except they were Presbyterians rather than a kind of episcopal congregationalism LOL if ever two groups were made for each other, it was the Covenanters and the Puritans, and they hated each other over the tiniest differences. Really sad actually.

I always found it ironic that Cromwell formed England's only republic and only military dictatorship.

To return to the question at hand, it is quite possible that a good number of them were Protestant Scots-Irish, if that's what you're thinking of.
Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Aug-2006 at 05:35
 
Originally posted by Temujin

Originally posted by gcle2003

PS If the Irish and the English were generally enemies, how come so many Irish voluntarily served in the British army, many of them heroically, and at least two of the most famous British generals - Wellington and Montgomery - were Irish?
 
Montgomery was not Irish, he was of Anglo-Norman ancestry.
So are a lot of other Irishmen.
 
and most notably, he served in the British Army, not the Irish Army...
 
That's what I said, wasn't it? In fact that was the whole point: Irishmen have been some of the best soldiers the Army has ever had. Strictly though it isn't (and wasn't) the 'British Army' but the United Kingdom army.
 
In fact the reason the army is not called the Royal Army (unlike the Royal Navy, the Royal Air Force and the Royal Marines) is because it is not considered one unit, but many, which may or may not be 'Royal', and several of which have or had specific territorial designations, like the Royal Inniskilling Fusiliers, the Connaught Rangers, and the Queen's Royal Irish Hussars, which were Irish.
 
Even in today's slimmed down army there are still the Irish Guards and the  Royal Irish Regiment.


Edited by gcle2003 - 18-Aug-2006 at 05:35
Back to Top
Emperor Barbarossa View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Jul-2005
Location: Pittsburgh, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2888
  Quote Emperor Barbarossa Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Aug-2006 at 08:20
Originally posted by Timotheus

Originally posted by Croppy Boy

Don't forget the number that Cromwell shipped off to Barbados as slaves...

Cromwell, father of democracy and proponent of the white slave trade... Confused


Not to mention the Scots Covenanters, who were basically Calvinists just like him except they were Presbyterians rather than a kind of episcopal congregationalism LOL if ever two groups were made for each other, it was the Covenanters and the Puritans, and they hated each other over the tiniest differences. Really sad actually.

I always found it ironic that Cromwell formed England's only republic and only military dictatorship.

To return to the question at hand, it is quite possible that a good number of them were Protestant Scots-Irish, if that's what you're thinking of.

Yes, timotheus, the Scots Covenanters were so similar to the Puritans, but they fought over the silliest differences. The Scots-Irish moved to the colonies in the 18th century, and the migration was of about 400,000. This was the largest Irish migration until the potato famine, and I find it hard to call it "Irish", since it all began with thousands of Lowland Scots moving to Ulster, and then mixing with the locals for 100 years, and then again moving, this time to the colonies. They were not "forced" to move, but rather, to get away from the border wars(Lowland Scots) and later, the civil wars in Ireland between Anglican/Presbyterians against Catholics.

Back to Top
Paul View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
AE Immoderator

Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
  Quote Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Aug-2006 at 09:52
I think the covententors and puritans may ave had a lot in common but the puritans were only a faction in parliament. And a faction that by no means had control.
 
In the Bishop's Wars Parliament supported covenant against the King.
 
In the ECW Parlimentary leader John Pym promised covernant he would convert England to Presbytarian in return for aid in the war...... Something impossible because half of parliment weren't even puritans and many athiests.
 
Later Charles II promised parliament he would convert England to presbytarian in return for their aid in his war agiainst Parliament.
 
 
Most of the clashes between parliament and covernant seem to have come from lies told by pragmatic politicians to covenant who being fanatics believed them unquestioningly. Rather than differences of doctrine.
 
 
 
 
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk
Back to Top
Timotheus View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 15-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 478
  Quote Timotheus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Aug-2006 at 21:13
Later Charles II promised parliament he would convert England to presbytarian in return for their aid in his war agiainst Parliament.


Promised that to the Scots, too...that he would uphold the Solemn League & Covenant and all the other covenants, etc. etc...broke his word, the lousy rat. The Puritans were always a minority in England, and that was why they were for the most part unsuccessful, save when you had the genius Cromwell come along, or when they went to other lands.
Back to Top
Paul View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
AE Immoderator

Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
  Quote Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Aug-2006 at 21:48
whoops that's a misprint, should be,
 
Later Charles II promised Covernant he would convert England to presbytarian in return for their aid in his war agiainst Parliament
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk
Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Aug-2006 at 04:28
Originally posted by Emperor Barbarossa

The Scots-Irish moved to the colonies in the 18th century, and the migration was of about 400,000. This was the largest Irish migration until the potato famine, and I find it hard to call it "Irish", since it all began with thousands of Lowland Scots moving to Ulster, and then mixing with the locals for 100 years, and then again moving, this time to the colonies. They were not "forced" to move, but rather, to get away from the border wars(Lowland Scots) and later, the civil wars in Ireland between Anglican/Presbyterians against Catholics.
 
Your facts are OK. but one of the points is that the 'Lowland Scots' you refer to were/are largely of Irish origin, though there were probably some Anglo-Saxon-Norman elements mixed in, as well as other British tribes.
 
The waters between Antrim/Down on the one side and Galloway on the other are extremely narrow and from very early times the populations on either side were culturally and ethnically very similar. In particular after the departure of the Romans there was a considerable migration of Scots from Ireland into Galloway. This remained true even after the Anglo-Saxons conquered Galloway in the 7th century and began settling there.
 
 
Back to Top
Emperor Barbarossa View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Jul-2005
Location: Pittsburgh, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2888
  Quote Emperor Barbarossa Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Aug-2006 at 07:37
Originally posted by gcle2003

Originally posted by Emperor Barbarossa

The Scots-Irish moved to the colonies in the 18th century, and the migration was of about 400,000. This was the largest Irish migration until the potato famine, and I find it hard to call it "Irish", since it all began with thousands of Lowland Scots moving to Ulster, and then mixing with the locals for 100 years, and then again moving, this time to the colonies. They were not "forced" to move, but rather, to get away from the border wars(Lowland Scots) and later, the civil wars in Ireland between Anglican/Presbyterians against Catholics.
 
Your facts are OK. but one of the points is that the 'Lowland Scots' you refer to were/are largely of Irish origin, though there were probably some Anglo-Saxon-Norman elements mixed in, as well as other British tribes.
 


Yes, I do know what you are saying, but the Lowland Scots of the 1600s were no more "Irish"(though they had Gaelic origins) than the English were "German"(though they had Anglo-Saxon origins).

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Feb-2007 at 15:49
Re Charles II and Cromwell's Transportations

Which is ironic because Charles I turned down Scottish help under the same conditions. Also, Parliament could promise what it wanted, but with the Army and to some extent Cromwell backing the Independents it was incapable of delivering them.

Out of interest, were Cromwell's transportations the first time this punishment was used. The failed Monmouth Rebellion against James II certainly led to mass transportations, anything prior to Cromwell?    

Edited by Bowker's cat - 28-Feb-2007 at 15:51
Back to Top
IrishNation1 View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 02-Sep-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 77
  Quote IrishNation1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Mar-2007 at 17:59
To get back to the Original Question. I am not Familiar with any Large number of Irish being Shipped off to Colonies controlled by Britain. British and Irish may have been sent to them to build up a Loyal Population but it was not Just the Irish sent there. Also Britain and Ireland were not Enemies at the time so  the Irish were not essentially enemies. They were part of the Union.(Great Britain and Ireland) And as for the Irish sent to Australia as Prisoners. The Brits sent many to Australia as Criminals to work the Land.  They wanted to Build up a Nation there so many Small crimes resulted in Penal Servitude, and many people were shipped to Remote Parts of the Empire such as Australia. I think that adresses most of what you asked

Edited by IrishNation1 - 07-Mar-2007 at 18:00
Early this morning I signed my death warrant.
Michael Collins, to friend John O'Kane after signing Anglo-Irish Treaty in 1921
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.