Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Thai why didnt they borrow Chineses sop Posted: 06-Oct-2006 at 07:43 |
China was too big to keep all its flok together. They were not Chines for the same reasons that so many parts of India today are not Indian.
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
|
Jazz
Baron
Joined: 29-Mar-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 410
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Jun-2005 at 15:22 |
The Thai script is also derived from the Indian Tamil script.
Speculation is that this is due to the fact that most of the sea-faring
Indians were Tamil back then.
|
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Jun-2005 at 13:59 |
I heard that the vietnamese used to be malay but the chinese killed most of them because they were pirates. The cham people of vietnam.
|
|
kermit_criminal
Knight
Joined: 27-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 72
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 30-May-2005 at 01:09 |
the Thais should have invaded the philippines, maybe then we would have some culture worth noting, aside from the Muslim sultanates, but those guys are too damn angry all the time
Edited by kermit_criminal
|
|
King Chulalongkorn
Samurai
Joined: 23-Apr-2005
Location: Thailand
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 121
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Apr-2005 at 19:54 |
hahaha Anujkhamar! How is India my friend? I have been to Assam a while
ago and been to Bengal quite a few times! Nice place.fun fun! hahaha
peace bro!
|
Kha Wora Phutthachao Nop Phra Phumiban Bunya Direk
|
|
Anujkhamar
Chieftain
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1027
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Apr-2005 at 15:04 |
*steps on the next plane to thailand*
|
|
King Chulalongkorn
Samurai
Joined: 23-Apr-2005
Location: Thailand
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 121
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Apr-2005 at 13:04 |
Well this is an interesting perspective you all placed in my country and my great people. Good inputs on the history of the Thai, but your inputs of raciology infer a colonialistic point of view to the thread and implies an inferior-superior status on different racial groups ( as the raciology theory was ment to do).
The Thai people belong to the Ai-Lao group of people which are not only Thai, but includes Laotians, Shan and Karen ethnic groups of northeastern Burma as well as the Tai groups of present day Yunnan province in China.
The word 'Thai' is nothing more than a national identity, the Thai people and the Lao people actually are related culturally and ethnically to the Tai ethnic group in china and we lived in Yunnan (once called Nang Zhou or Nanchao) by the Han Chinese. This was our historical birthplace and land that were forced of with the influx of the Han Dynasty, forcing the Tai people in an ethnic diaspora to the golden lands of the south. Some settled in northern vietnam, laos, modern day Thailand and parts of burma and north easter India.
When the Tai groups arrived in present day Thailand, the land was already occupied by the Khmer Empire, which is now present day Cambodia. Khmer Empire was influenced by Indian empires such as the Chandra Gupta Mauraya Empire and King Ashoka's empire to spread brahimism and buddhism. Hence the the Khmers were culturally Indian. When we Thais arrived to the lands of present day Thailand, we formed small princedoms and formed the state of Sri Sukkothai (first great empire of Thailand) and ousted the Khmer Empire of our lands. Thais of course adopted Khmer writing script (based of Indian Sanksrit) as well as adopted some methods in building and city admnistration as the Khmers had greatly mastered.
The fact that Thailand is so close to India allowed a lucrative trade with India and Thailand and allowed our recongition as the hegemonic power of S.E Asia.
Its true that Thailand is the cross roads for both India and Chinese traders..beautiful actually.
Proof of the beauty of our distinctly 'Thai' culture...
|
Kha Wora Phutthachao Nop Phra Phumiban Bunya Direk
|
|
babyblue
Chieftain
Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1174
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Jan-2005 at 11:07 |
hmm....maybe the thais think riding elephants are cooler than riding horses..
|
|
|
Cywr
King
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6003
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 23:40 |
People still argue wether Australoid is a seperate racial group or a sub group of Caucasoid. |
I think initialy they was a tendancy to put them somewhere within the
existing framework (Negro/Caucas/Mongol), but eventualy some
anthroplogists began to treat them as a seperate group unto themselves.
Geneitlcy Australian aborigines cluster close to people in Indonesia,
but on a more old fashioned physical anthroplogical view, appear to
cluster closer to certain Caucasoid groups.
The thing with Physical anthropology is that several different
classification systems have emerged, most of the main groups have sub
groups which can be sort of in two main groups at the same time leading
to them being classified differently by different people, mostly for
convinience sake.
|
Arrrgh!!"
|
|
Christscrusader
Baron
Joined: 13-Nov-2004
Location: Greece
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 481
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 20:09 |
The Tai like their own culture.
|
Heaven helps those, who help themselves.
-Jc
|
|
TheOrcRemix
Consul
Joined: 28-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 369
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 20:03 |
well put
|
True peace is not the absence of tension, but the presence of justice.
Sir Francis Drake is the REAL Pirate of the Caribbean
|
|
Paul
General
AE Immoderator
Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Oct-2004 at 21:57 |
Originally posted by .....
I don't think Austroloid is a sub-group of Caucasoids. Austroloids are related to the Aboriginals of Australia, and they are not classified as a sub-group of Caucasoids. |
Well, 19th century racial theory breaks down. When we apply intelligence.
Negrozoid, a clear racial group. Mongoloid everything from the American Indian to the SE Asians, clearly some dispute as to whether they are a single or multiple ethnic group, begs an answers. The Caucasoids := yes the darkest Sri Lankans and the lightest Scandinavians are no different whatsoer but in skin pigmentation. However the Australian Aborigony is more different but still incredibly close to caucasoids too. Are the South sea Islanders a seperate racial group (australoid) or all of them caucasians too. Skin colour isn't a factor when dealing with caucasoids.
Alternatively racial theory is, the brown stuff that come from the cow behind, and there is only one race -human-.
Personally I like talking about race, but the trouble is.... Even from an untra-commie like me, in any discussion it is difficult to remain unpoluted by ultra rightwing bollocks. Though I do try......
Edited by Paul
|
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Oct-2004 at 02:07 |
I don't think Austroloid is a sub-group of Caucasoids. Austroloids are related to the Aboriginals of Australia, and they are not classified as a sub-group of Caucasoids.
|
|
Paul
General
AE Immoderator
Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2004 at 07:26 |
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Negritos
People still argue wether Australoid is a seperate racial group or a sub group of Caucasoid.
|
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Oct-2004 at 13:41 |
Originally posted by Paul
The 1st inhabitants of Thailand migrated there from India so were probably caucazoid. Later major migrants the Mon for instance came were mixed race but a good part caucazoid. The thais we don't know what. And then for the last 1000 years a steady influx of Chinese. So the amount of mongoloid has steadily increased. Some Bangkok Chinese/Thais can look almost Chinese.
|
Actually, the first inhabitants of Thailand region where a group of people called the "Negritos". They look very similar to southern Africans, tight curly hair, black skin, but they are of short stature. Shorter then the Africans. There are still some Negritos left in Thailand.
|
|
Paul
General
AE Immoderator
Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Oct-2004 at 21:10 |
The 1st inhabitants of Thailand migrated there from India so were probably caucazoid. Later major migrants the Mon for instance came were mixed race but a good part caucazoid. The thais we don't know what. And then for the last 1000 years a steady influx of Chinese. So the amount of mongoloid has steadily increased. Some Bangkok Chinese/Thais can look almost Chinese.
|
|
|
Cywr
King
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6003
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 09-Oct-2004 at 02:16 |
Originally posted by Degredado
Paul, could you please explain to me how the Thais were once Caucasian? I have a thick skull. |
Caucasian as in another word for Caucasoid maybe?
Though he is as good as saying they were mix, so part Indian part whatever probably.
Edited by Cywr
|
Arrrgh!!"
|
|
Tobodai
Tsar
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4310
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Oct-2004 at 23:16 |
that lady avatar of yours has scary eyebrows
|
"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton
|
|
babyblue
Chieftain
Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1174
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Oct-2004 at 15:25 |
Originally posted by Degredado
Paul, could you please explain to me how the Thais were once Caucasian? I have a thick skull. |
lol.......i was thinking likewise...
and i don't think they're mongoloids either...
|
|
|
Degredado
Consul
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Portugal
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 366
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Oct-2004 at 13:59 |
Paul, could you please explain to me how the Thais were once Caucasian? I have a thick skull.
|
Vou votar nas putas. Estou farto de votar nos filhos delas
|
|