An Arab Celebratatory Thread.

LOL Khuzistan isn't even majority Arab, enough of the Saddamesque BS, and Northern Iraq is majority Kurdish speaking a non-Arab language, so they are not part of the so called "Arab" world, and I am sure the Amazighs/Berbers have something to say about their situation too.

You must sympathize with Baathist ideology right? The same Baathists that claim Salahudin as an ethnic Arab.

You know who Ibn Khaldun is?  Baathists hated him so much they burned his books.

I love keepers of history such as Ibn Khaldun who gave credit where it was due:

"�It is a remarkable fact that, with few exceptions, most Muslim scholars�in the intellectual sciences have been non-Arabs�thus the founders of grammar were Sibawaih and after him, al-Farisi and Az-Zajjaj. All of them were of Persian descent�they invented rules of (Arabic) grammar�great jurists were Persians� only the Persians engaged in the task of preserving knowledge and writing systematic scholarly works. Thus the truth of the statement of the prophet becomes apparent, 'If learning were suspended in the highest parts of heaven the Persians would attain it"�The intellectual sciences were also the preserve of the Persians, left alone by the Arabs, who did not cultivate them�as was the case with all crafts�This situation continued in the cities as long as the Persians and Persian countries, Iraq, Khorasan and Transoxiana (modern Central Asia), retained their sedentary culture."

The Muqaddimah Translated by F. Rosenthal (III, pp. 311-15, 271-4 [Arabic]; R.N. Frye (p.91)

Please don't call Algerians Arab that is insulting as I am sure it would be for many others you have included. As for the garbage you have posted just read this post I had made previously it explains your behavior:

This is interesting, after reading through all these thread is seems that I am starting to understand some of the problems in the middle-east. There seems to be two younger cultures, turkic and arabic which are sounded by some of the oldest in the world, and they are under pressure because of that. To fix the problem turks and arabs seems to have taken different and at the same time similar approaches

First turkish approach, if you don�t have enough history make your own. What exactly is Turanoid. Has anyone studying anthropology in a reputable school ever heard of it? NO Turks have decided that there were these imaginary people that people lived in southern Russia looked white (with almond eyes) and had a native language that resembled closely to Mongolian. These people moved south and somehow magically all the people that lived there disappeared or got assimilated to these imaginary people. In fact Turks have made such a delusional version of history that they seems to have to fight with all their neighbors (Iranians, Kurds, Greek, Armenian, and Arabs) because their version of history does not match anyone else�s. I am not sure if there is any other group that has to fight in this many fronts

Second arab approach, if you don�t have enough history use linguistics. There were these people that lived in the Middle East long time ago. They somehow lost their identity and don�t exist in today�s Middle East. So when arabs come short they pull out the Semitic card. Because arabic has a few words that have similar roots as the language these people used that means these people  are related. Armenians speak a language that is in the same family as greeks. How often do you see an Armenian use greek history as if the are the same as Armenian. They don�t do that because Armenians have their own history and don�t need to borrow someone else�s, also geerks are still around to own their own history.

There is nothing wrong with not having a long history. If you want to identify yourself as turks and arabs then accepts that these people were nomads recently and don�t have much of a history and culture, or accept that many people that today are called turk and arab are just simply descendant of people whose identity was lost to invaders, and move on

as i replied to you previously  give us proofs of what you are talking about.

at least examples that Arabs lost their Identity and dont exist in ME,

that so we would consider your statments for disscussion otherwise its nothing but  false and represent your own opinions.

There were these people that lived in the Middle East long time ago. They somehow lost their identity and don�t exist in today�s Middle East. So when arabs come short they pull out the Semitic card. Because arabic has a few words that have similar roots as the language these people used that means these people  are related. Armenians speak a language that is in the same family as greeks. How often do you see an Armenian use greek history as if the are the same as Armenian. They don�t do that because Armenians have their own history and don�t need to borrow someone else�s, also geerks are still around to own their own history.

ok my Question to answer that would be How often did Arabs actully used Babylonians History as it is Arabic History?