Originally posted by spartan1138
Whoa. I didn't realize all my
grammar and spelling mistakes in that last post.
Sorry :'( . My views on the Passion of the Christ
where positive. The movie was great and lead alot
of people to God. All the critisism it got from the
Jews (don't get me wrong here I have nothing
against the Jews) were stupid. They critisised it
because it was true and it made them look bad. I
don't think the Jews did anything bad back in the
time when they crucified Jesus. They where all part
of Gods' plan to forgive are sins. |
I can see your point.
I believe in the existence of Jesus, perhaps not as
such a divine person, but as one with answers. I
believe his miracles are true events, though perhaps
not by his "divinity". The Son of God is a strong
statement, which offended the Jews much, as there
is no God but God, and to be the son of god, makes
you a semi-god. Jews always deny that they
crucified Christ, and to an extent it is true, and to
another extent it is false. They did not personally
crucify him. They persisted on Pilate having it done,
who was against it, but to avoid a "confrontation" with
Caeser let them have their wish. He washed his
hands, signifying if he was indeed innocent, it was
their fault. The ROMANS then took Jesus and
flogged him beat him, so on and so forth, and then
they crucified him. The crucifixion itself would not
have happened, but the Jews persisted until it did.
Jesus is a man who earns my respect, though i am
not a Christian. I believe that his intentions are pure,
and as does any legend, his image has been
tainted, changed, sometimes shamed. He was an
extreme pacifist, and the wars fought in his name do
not do him justice, for he never would have done it.
Let us recall that he said instead of an eye for and
eye, turn the other cheek. Love your enemy.
As for his existence, I think it could easily be
assumed he did exist, but when you say his
existence you talk about more his divinity. it is
different to believe his divinity than his existence, as
was posted above.
And no, word never reached Caeser about Jesus,
because to the Empire, he was just another looney,
who was crucified. To put it into perspective,
crucifixion was then what hanging and burning
would be in the middle ages. Thats just how people
were punished. So of course word never reached
Augustus that we know of, and if it did, Augustus
wouldnt have made note of it, because a lot of
people were claiming things of such magnitude at
the time. Its called blasphemy. That is what Christ
was crucified for. Blasphemy. Not the claim to being
the son of God, but they called it blasphemy,
because that is what it is to Jews