Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Salah ad-Din
Samurai
Joined: 15-Apr-2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 138
|
Quote Reply
Topic: War on the American Plains Posted: 14-Nov-2012 at 08:54 |
Few periods in American history have been more
romanticized in popular culture than the Indian Wars on the Western Plains in
the second half of the 19th Century. For many Civil War heroes - Sherman,
Sheridan, Hancock, and most famously Custer, among others - it was a
continuation of their military careers, but under radically different
circumstances. For their Indian foes - Sioux, Cheyenne, and Arapahoe - it was a
war for survival they ultimately had no chance of winning.
In the black
and white Western films of the early 20th Century, the American cavalryman was
depicted as a dashing and morally upright hero, tasked with fending off swarming
hordes of 'wild' Indians. A century later, pop culture prefers to depict the
Plains Indian as a noble mystic, at one with nature and driven to fight against
the rapacious greed of the white man.
As is often the case in history,
the reality was very different than both of these cultural depictions. Though
there is no denying that war on the Western Plains was certainly 'wild', and
bore witness to incidents of casual brutality that chilled the blood of Civil
War veterans.
Indian tribes and bands had been wandering the Plains for
thousands of years, waging war on one another. These conflicts were typical of
those found in tribal cultures. Most were raids, focusing on capturing material
goods or humiliating foemen. The violence itself, though sometimes vicious in
its intensity, was minimal. Non-fatal displays of martial prowess, such as
'counting coup' with lances, was common.
By the time of the American
Civil War (1861-1865) the tribes of the Plains had been in extensive contact
with whites, and many were well-equipped with firearms. Veterans of the Indian
Wars claimed that virtually every Indian warrior they faced had a pistol; many
others used rifles and carbines and some even wielded sabers and cavalry
banners. Some mocked white soldiers by shouting profanity in English and blowing
on captured military trumpets.
The Indians were adept at terror tactics
and guerilla warfare. Initially their covert style of warfare inspired amusement
and contempt in soldiers that had recently been sent to the Plains, but their
foes in the Army learned to appreciate their methods. Pitched battles such as
the Little Bighorn were a rarity. Most encounters were small - the most typical
scenario involved a party of several soldiers or civilians being ambushed by a
party of a few dozen young braves.
Veteran American soldiers on the
Plains always cautioned green recruits to 'save the last bullet for yourself'.
During the Fetterman Fight and the Little Bighorn, the last surviving white
officers appear to have shot each other rather than risk being taken alive. Men
who were captured, or found wounded on the field of battle were usually tortured
to death with hideous cruelty. A common sight on the Plains in the 1860s and
1870s was the corpse of a white soldier or settler, missing its scalp, with deep
gashes across its throat, chest, and thighs. The nose, fingers, toes, eyes, and
genitalia might also be missing.
After the Civil War, white America was
thoroughly disenchanted with warfare, particularly far-flung 'small wars' of
empire on the Western frontier. The military was commonly mocked and criticized
in the Eastern media, while former abolitionists now turned their focus to the
'Indian Problem'. The military and the settler population of the West were
offended by the Eastern sympathy with the 'noble red man', their views jaded by
personal experience with the gruesome and thankless nature of Plains
warfare.
As with many human conflicts, both sides commited atrocities. It
would be unfair to overlook the unprovoked attacks and heinous tortures
inflicted by Indian warriors on their new white neighbors, but it would be just
as unfair to overlook the fact that the sanctity of their lands and identities
were not being respected by a growing population of white settlers. At a council
with white officers, one Indian chief recommended that the whites 'put all the
Indians on wheels' so it would be easier to push them to the most remote corners
of the country.
In the mid-late 19th Century, America was rapidly
fulfilling its 'Manifest Destiny', steamrolling over the vastly out-numbered and
under-organized Indian opposition. The Indians themselves had no hope of any
long-term resistance against this inevitable process. Neither society understood
the other, and few on either side even tried. Though its loss of life was
minimal (compared to the Civil War that preceded it), the Indian Wars of the
1860s and 1870s were an ugly, tragic, and indeed, 'wild' chapter in America's
history.
|
|
Nick1986
Emperor
Mighty Slayer of Trolls
Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Nov-2012 at 13:40 |
Plains Indian war shirt traditionally decorated with the scalps of dead enemies http://media.liveauctiongroup.net/i/5563/8523558_1.jpg?v=8CD70B5BB683C30
Edited by Nick1986 - 23-Nov-2012 at 13:41
|
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
|
|
Nick1986
Emperor
Mighty Slayer of Trolls
Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Nov-2012 at 11:22 |
Crow war shirt, courtesy of silverbeargallery.com
|
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
|
|
Toltec
Arch Duke
Shape Shifter
Joined: 12-May-2011
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1748
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Nov-2012 at 11:37 |
American Indians were not this noble egalitarian nature loving people full of ancient wisdom portrayed by modern Hollywood. They were a brutal, primitive, treacherous, murderous, stone age people who practiced torture for fun.
However they were brutal, primitive, treacherous, murderous, stone age people who practiced torture for fun on their own land, and if a load of Americans out of greed went to their lands to steal, rape and pillage and found themselves on the wrong end of these Indian's traits, they get no sympathy from me.
Edited by Toltec - 24-Nov-2012 at 11:38
|
|
|
Azita
Pretorian
Suspended
Joined: 13-Oct-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 162
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Nov-2012 at 05:09 |
Originally posted by Toltec
and if a load of Americans out of greed went to their lands to steal, rape and pillage
|
Would the treatment of the indigenous population of "america" be the largest instance of ethnic cleansing the world has ever seen?
This was still occurring in living memory (just), after the first world war.
When one reads of the trail of tear and the sand creek, bear river, wounded knee massacres, it is rather sickening.
But as Toltec indicates, the (Indians) were also capable of much savagery.
Azita
|
|
Nick1986
Emperor
Mighty Slayer of Trolls
Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Nov-2012 at 08:28 |
The Indians didn't know any better. The white man could be equally cruel: it is believed scalping was introduced to the Americas by Croatian mercenaries in French service
|
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
|
|
Rocky
Knight
Joined: 10-Oct-2012
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 46
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Nov-2012 at 20:01 |
Excellent description Salah. My thought is that the West was filled with many months or years of boredom and scraping by, broken up by the occasional acts of violence. Of course it is the violence that people remember.
|
|
Nick1986
Emperor
Mighty Slayer of Trolls
Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-Nov-2012 at 07:54 |
When things did come down to violence, sneak attacks were preferred. Indians could creep up on a camp in darkness, kill everyone, then disappear
|
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
|
|
Centrix Vigilis
Emperor
Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Aug-2013 at 14:56 |
|
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
S. T. Friedman
Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'
|
|