I would add the story of Ishtar going to the Underworld to save her lover, Tammuz
http://www.gatewaystobabylon.com/myths/texts/classic/ishtardesc.htmShe was required to give at every door toward the Underworld one of her protective amulets, and she complied, even though she knew that she wouldn't have anything to protect her and she would die - but she did it anyway, all for love. She was Inanna, and as such she was the first living person in the Western tradition /that started with Sumer/ who dared to enter the realm of the dead, and sacrifice her life for her lover - in other words, before Jesus there was Ishtar.
"...
To the Land of No Return, the realm of Ereshkigal,To the dark house, the abode of Irkalla
To the house which none leave who have entered it,
To the road from which there is no way back,
To the house wherein the entrants are bereft of light,
Where dust is their fare and clay their food,
Where they see no light, residing in darkness,
Where they are clothed like birds, with wings for garments,
And where over door and bolt is spread dust.
When Ishtar reached the gate of the Land of No
Return,..." Ibid.In my view, Ishtar is one of the manifestations of the Great Goddess Mother, and passed into ancient Egypt as Isis, in Anatolia as Cibele, in Thracia as Cotys, in Greece as Hera/Aphrodite/Persephone/Demeter - and each one of those aspects bore a feature of her,, all stacked like cards behind each other, everyone of there may have a story about her told, with pictures etc - all up to the Virgin Mary and Mary Magdalene, who are also aspects of the Mother-Goddess. Ishtar is a cultural archetype, and one of the oldest faces of it - manifestation of Mother-Nature, as such one can jump to Jung and his archetypes, one of which is the mother one:
"...The mother archetype is a particularly good example. All of
our
ancestors had mothers. We have evolved in an environment that included
a mother or mother-substitute. We would never have survived without our
connection with a nurturing-one during our times as helpless infants.
It
stands to reason that we are "built" in a way that reflects that
evolutionary
environment: We come into this world ready to want mother, to seek her,
to recognize her, to deal with her.
So the mother archetype is our built-in ability to recognize a
certain
relationship, that of "mothering." Jung says that this is rather
abstract,
and we are likely to project the archetype out into the world and onto
a particular person, usually our own mothers. Even when an archetype
doesn't
have a particular real person available, we tend to personify the
archetype,
that is, turn it into a mythological "story-book" character. This
character
symbolizes the archetype.
The mother archetype is symbolized by the primordial mother or
"earth
mother" of mythology, by Eve and Mary in western traditions, and by
less
personal symbols such as the church, the nation, a forest, or the
ocean.
According to Jung, someone whose own mother failed to satisfy the
demands
of the archetype may well be one that spends his or her life seeking
comfort
in the church, or in identification with "the motherland," or in
meditating
upon the figure of Mary, or in a life at sea...."
http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/jung.html
Or, staying on the prehistory-theme, I would go with Gumbitas and her Bird-Woman, /but staying away from the idea of the universal matriarchal organization during Paleolithic, I root for egually-gendered society in the Prehistory/, and follow this to Isthar, through Gobekli Tepe, Malta, /you already mentioned Catal Huyuk/.
Anyway, this is a very richly layered stack of material one can elaborate on. Even the fairies, nymphs and mermaids are connected with the variety of female cults - the many Ishtars from all kinds of places. So, I don't want to come across like some pushy old croneyou are running a very interesting site, cudos for that. Count me as a fan.
Edited by Don Quixote - 15-Feb-2012 at 23:26