Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Nick1986
Emperor
Mighty Slayer of Trolls
Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Easter Island Heads Posted: 16-Oct-2012 at 10:29 |
Originally posted by Mountain Man
Why does everyone persist in thinking that Olmec heads are "negroid"? Why can't negroid heads be Olmec instead? |
Because black people originated in Africa, not the Americas
|
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
|
 |
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Oct-2012 at 16:15 |
Are you certain of that?
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
 |
Nick1986
Emperor
Mighty Slayer of Trolls
Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Oct-2012 at 06:29 |
Originally posted by red clay
Are you certain of that? |
Unless you can find evidence of the contrary. Why are modern Africans black and modern Native Americans more Asiatic?
|
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
|
 |
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Oct-2012 at 10:06 |
Got me. Why are Australoids black and not Asiatic?
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
 |
Nick1986
Emperor
Mighty Slayer of Trolls
Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Oct-2012 at 09:45 |
Hard to say. Perhaps they were descended from Africans who colonised India? They may have migrated before the arrival of lighter-skinned invaders
|
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
|
 |
Don Quixote
Tsar
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 29-Dec-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4734
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Dec-2013 at 21:26 |
So, are the Europeans responsible for the ruination of the easter Island native culture? "...HONOLULU, HAWAII —According to some scholars, the people of Easter Island, or Rapa Nui, committed “environmental
suicide” by deforesting their island, an event that led to the
society's demographic collapse. But now some archaeologists, including
the Bishop Museum's Mara Mulrooney, believe that
intepretation of the island's history is wrong. Mulrooney studied 300
radiocarbon dates from Rapa Nui and found that people continued to use
the interior of the island to cultivate crops such as sweet potatoes up
until European contact. Previously it had been believed that these areas
had been abandoned when the island chiefdom supposedly collapsed. " The
new picture that emerges from these results is really one of
sustainability and continuity rather than collapse, which sheds new
light on what we can really learn from Rapa Nui,” said Mulrooney. “Based
on these new findings, perhaps Rapa Nui should be the poster-child of
how human ingenuity can result in success, rather than failure.” Mulrooney believes that
it wasn't until after European contact and the introduction of new
diseases that the society underwent demographic collapse...." http://archaeology.org/news/1649-131216-easter-island-never-collapsed
|
 |
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Dec-2013 at 23:41 |
Originally posted by red clay
Are you certain of that? |
Red Clay, just why would an administrator say such a thing? LOL
|
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
|
 |
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Dec-2013 at 23:43 |
Originally posted by Nick1986
Hard to say. Perhaps they were descended from Africans who colonised India? They may have migrated before the arrival of lighter-skinned invaders
|
And Saint Nick 1986, just where did these "honkeys" originate?
Ron
|
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
|
 |
medenaywe
AE Moderator
Master of Meanings
Joined: 06-Nov-2010
Location: /
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17084
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Dec-2013 at 01:01 |
they had waited for first ships and they migrated.  Technology moved them out.
|
 |
Mountain Man
General
Joined: 16-Aug-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 873
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Dec-2013 at 11:34 |
Originally posted by Nick1986
I think the statues were the cause of war and famine. The islanders cut down all the trees to use as rollers to move the statues, resulting in the irreversible erosion of the fertile soil
| Actually, the latest studies showed that the statues could have been moved with the use of any rollers at all.
More likely is that the growing population stripped all the timber for building and cooking and similar domestic uses. Had the wood been used as rollers, a set of them would have been sufficient to move many statues and would not have resulted in removal of all of the forests.
|
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
|
 |
Mountain Man
General
Joined: 16-Aug-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 873
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Dec-2013 at 11:37 |
Originally posted by Nick1986
Originally posted by red clay
Are you certain of that? |
Unless you can find evidence of the contrary. Why are modern Africans black and modern Native Americans more Asiatic? | Because the Amerinds migrated to the American continent over the Bering Land Bridge and/or followed the edge of the ice shelf. There was no bridge from the African continent. Hence the Amerinds, Innuits and others are Asiatic by ancestry.
|
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
|
 |
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Dec-2013 at 10:05 |
The islands legends have it that the statues "walked" to their platforms. There are some scientists now that doubt there was ever any heavy forestation on the Island, at least not not enough to be of any consequence and certainly not enough to be relied upon for much by the inhabitants.
Hence the Amerinds, Innuits and others are Asiatic by ancestry.
Uh huh, and then there is Kenniwick Man, at approx. 9500 BCE and deffinetly Caucasian. MM, as we discover more, there seems to be a situation developing where there is more than one correct answer to this question.
And there is also, Hueyatlaco.
Edited by red clay - 20-Dec-2013 at 10:27
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
 |
Mountain Man
General
Joined: 16-Aug-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 873
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Dec-2013 at 11:32 |
Originally posted by red clay
The islands legends have it that the statues "walked" to their platforms. There are some scientists now that doubt there was ever any heavy forestation on the Island, at least not not enough to be of any consequence and certainly not enough to be relied upon for much by the inhabitants.
Hence the Amerinds, Innuits and others are Asiatic by ancestry.
Uh huh, and then there is Kenniwick Man, at approx. 9500 BCE and deffinetly Caucasian. MM, as we discover more, there seems to be a situation developing where there is more than one correct answer to this question.
And there is also, Hueyatlaco.
|
i would agree with you except for one small problem...it seems that "caucasians" are now defined as a group that includes " asians". - Cau·ca·sian
- [ kaw káy'n ]
- white-skinned: relating to people who are light-skinned or of European origin
- of
former ethnic group: belonging to the light-skinned peoples of Europe,
northern Africa, and western and southern Asia, formerly considered a
distinct ethnic group
- of Caucasia: relating to Caucasia, or its peoples, languages, or cultures
|
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
|
 |
Arthur-Robin
General
Joined: 23-Feb-2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 937
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-Dec-2013 at 16:45 |
A few different possible connections to be pieced together or dis/proven:
Thats interesting about the statues being unique & with tatoos etc like as if = ancestors.
Statues called Moai which may connect with Moa who "may have been the ancestor of mankind, was given birth to in centre of the earth by earth-mother Papa" [~ Noah? statues holding crux area like ham castrated noah?] (& the Moa birds of NZ, & Sa-Moa?)
I had thought that the stone hats could connect with Atlas motif? (Atlantis = Tiahuanaco/Peru/SouthAmerica.) Polynesians could have come from America rather than gone to America? (Currents. Kon Tiki. Kumara. Uru.) [Old World -> Atlantis/SthAmerica -> EasterIsl? (&, Atlantis/SthAmerica -> Olmec/central America?)] Could the deforestation (& toppled statues) been from catastrophe rather than human?
Some faces/heads from central America look similar to Easter island statues.
(Some faces/heads in other pacific islands look similar to easter island ones.)
However there is also the Indus valley script (& ears) connection. [Indus -> Easter -> SthAmer/Atlantis?]
Edited by Arthur-Robin - 21-Dec-2013 at 16:47
|
 |
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Dec-2013 at 22:09 |
It is mostly all too complicated by race and culture and time, to ever be explained!
Regards, Ron
|
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
|
 |