Why do Turks think they are so brave?

My comments regarded mostly the individual soldier. Regarding cohesion and firing in volleys, this was also a difficulty for Napoleonic Era Europeans. The first round would be a synchronized volley, but as I understand it, more often than not, the fire fight would after that consist of sporadic shooting, rather than in volleys. At least according to some of the accounts that I have read.

This is not true. Austria-Hungary under Metternich was against all such uprisings caused by the new winds of change in Europe; Liberalism and Nationalism. This was called the Congress System. Not all of the other European powers heeded it, and so it became rather ineffective, since Austria at this time was not strong enough to intervene beyond its borders in any significant manner. Metternich attempted to convince the Tzar not side with the revolting Greeks, even if they were fellow Orthodox Christians.

chinese people hate japanese people

greek people hate turkish people

The Greek revolution started on the 25th of March, 1821.

The group was called "Philiki Etaireia" - "Friendly Brotherhood". They never bought any guns etc until the uprising started. Then (and only after the initial couple of years where the Greeks had no outside help) did they begin to secure loans (under appaling terms and they were all paid off).

I have no idea what these places are. This rebellion (because there were many more in the past - all drown in blood) started in the Peloponnese (By "Mora" you must mean "Moreas"). Then it spread in all of Greece and the islands, in some places successfully in others with disastrous results. The Sultans decision to retaliate by mindless slaughters of civilians (Killing the Patriarch, slaughters in Psara & Chios etc) caught the interest of Western public and turned their governments in favor of the Greeks. Up till then these governments were uninterested to challenge the status-quo in the Eastern Mediterranean.

The Ottoman forces were greatly outnumbering the Greeks in both troops and equipment and after the defeat of Ali Pasha they were able to muster even more troops. They were all defeated so in 1825 (not 1821) the Ottomans called the Egyptians (who were practically independent from the ottoman empire) to invade Peloponnese from the south. Their reward would be the island of Crete. The Egyptian army was trained and equipped by the French and quickly effected serious defeats to the Greeks. In 1928 the western powers asked to mediate and end the dispute. They send their joined Anglo-French-Russian fleet to Greece. When the Ottomans refused to talk they attacked and destroyed the Egyptian fleet at Navarino. Without supplies the Egyptian troops were not able to continue fighting and that was practically the end of the war. Lesser battles between Greeks and Ottoman continued for a few more months.

No it doesn't say anything about "warrior skills". But it does say a lot about the social-economical factors that let to this expansion. The same factors led to the ensuing decline of the empire. Read more books on the subject, it's an interesting topic.

I hate no people at all, so don't speak on my behalf (ok, perhaps I hate a couple, but they are both Greeks

"The group was called "Philiki Etaireia" - "Friendly Brotherhood". They never bought any guns etc until the uprising started. Then (and only after the initial couple of years where the Greeks had no outside help) did they begin to secure loans (under appaling terms and they were all paid off)."

Not true. I dont know what Greeks called it, but it was called Etnik-i Eterya by Ottomans. Also, they werent such  friendly. Most of their works and purpose was to build an independent Greek state. Also, they had lots of lonas that werent paid back, only for help.

"I have no idea what these places are. This rebellion (because there were many more in the past - all drown in blood) started in the Peloponnese (By "Mora" you must mean "Moreas"). Then it spread in all of Greece and the islands, in some places successfully in others with disastrous results. The Sultans decision to retaliate by mindless slaughters of civilians (Killing the Patriarch, slaughters in Psara & Chios etc) caught the interest of Western public and turned their governments in favor of the Greeks. Up till then these governments were uninterested to challenge the status-quo in the Eastern Mediterranean."

I meant Moreas. The killing of patriarch wasnt a slaughter for these Greek rebellions. It was because that the patriarch tried to rebel the Greek population of �stanbul against the padishah. He did lots of "seperatist" works, so he was hanged in the front door of "Fener Rum Patrikhanesi". And uptill that time, the European governments and Russia certainly had the plan to seperate and divide Ottoman Empire and the Balkan nations. Russia always wanted to own the Balkans and have some Medeterrinnaen control, and used pan-slavism for this purpose. They aslo always supported Greek activities for independence. Also, England and France were the countries that in fact created the idea of Greek independence and seperatist actions.

"The Ottoman forces were greatly outnumbering the Greeks in both troops and equipment and after the defeat of Ali Pasha they were able to muster even more troops. They were all defeated so in 1825 (not 1821) the Ottomans called the Egyptians (who were practically independent from the ottoman empire) to invade Peloponnese from the south. Their reward would be the island of Crete. The Egyptian army was trained and equipped by the French and quickly effected serious defeats to the Greeks. In 1928 the western powers asked to mediate and end the dispute. They send their joined Anglo-French-Russian fleet to Greece. When the Ottomans refused to talk they attacked and destroyed the Egyptian fleet at Navarino. Without supplies the Egyptian troops were not able to continue fighting and that was practically the end of the war. Lesser battles between Greeks and Ottoman continued for a few more months."

I remembered that the victory of Mehmet Ali Pasha was on 1827. The Ottomans were unable to stop Greek rebellion, so they wanted help from an eyalet of the empire, Egypt. Egypt wasnt independent, it was a dependent state to Ottoman Empire, and it was an Ottoman terratory. Their reward wasnt Crete, their reward was being the "vali" of Grete and Syria. The western powers wanted an idndependent Greece, but Mahmud II didnt accept this, so they attacked Navarino.

Also the example I gave was showing some militarical superiority. Not only political or economical, because they mean nothing without military skills.

These say that the Turks were always outnumbered,but in Manzikert,Selchukid Army defeated the Great Byzantine army(which was composed with Greeks,Franks,Hungarians,Vikings(Vareg Guards),Slavs,also Oghuz-Kypchak-Pecheneg Turks)with only 50.000 men.

Turkish citizens do not hate  Hellen citizens

Hellen nationalists hate all Turks

Turkish nationalists hate all Hellens.

If there is a chance some of the Hellen citizens,non-nationalist citizens, start to hate Turkish citizens and the other way around this is due to the nationalistic propaganda.