CHINA VS ASIA (NOT INCLUDING RUSSIA)

Japan alone would annihilate modern China's navy with only half of its. India's conventional military is better equipped. The only advantage that the PLA has is ballistic nuclear weapons such as the Lang Su which has a distance of some 8000 miles, which would not even be used unless Beijing is crazy, so this thread is indeed "crazy".

India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel, and Iran(?) also have tons of nuclear weapons.

"no, this is wrong. india's conventional army, navy, and airfroce are all worse equipped than the pla. india's military budget is by far lower. "

PLA is stronger in term of quantity, and that is also why its military budget is higher. But India purchase much of its top weapon from Russia and other developed states which is reluctant to sell their best to China. This is why India's army is better equippted. Yes Inia's air force isn't much but Japan's is certainly better developed.

" india lost every battles."

That was in 1962, this is today.

 "and that happened long time ago when china was much technologically inferior to what it is today."

 

So was India back then, its military is even worse.

 

"India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel, and Iran(?) also have tons of nuclear weapons. "

 

Yes but none of them have ICBM's and India's missile can't even reach North China, most of its damage would only be delt in the Tibetan area, although India could probably reach Shang Hai with its newest ballistics. Bei Jing however is certainly out of their reach.

But speaking nuclear war is largely pointless since no modern state is sane enough to use it and thats why this whole scenario is nothing but a fantasy.

Just to make you remember: Turkey is in Asia!..

china's army, navy, and air forces are better equiped and technologically mroe advanced than india. that's an undisputed fact warhead.

try look up some information on www.sinodefence.com

70 percent of china's military budget is spent on equipment development, purchasing, maintence, production. it's not that expensive to support a solider in china.

china's military today only accounts for 2 million personels versus 5 million in the 70's. india has somewhere around 1.5 mil.

besides, the number of chinese advanced warships, planes, and other devices is also higher than that of india. it's true that china has thousands and thousands of outdated planes, ships. but they are mostly on reserve now while the new stuff is taking more important roles and accounts for an increasingly higher proportion.

Sources of oil:

East China Sea

South China Sea

Xinjiang

 

not if china uses nuclear warhead.

could you give a source to that table, i am 90% certain that pakistan does not have more nukes than us!

thats strange

i'll try to see if any other site matches that

edit : i would also sugest that you read the economy part of the link you just provided, as it backs up quite alot i will write in a future post (probably tonight, still working on it)


Edited by Anujkhamar

Originally posted by coolstorm not if china uses nuclear warhead.

The question remains if China would resort to such actions...

Many of China's neighbors also have nukes..but I'm not to sure about thier missile capabilities...