Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

What is the most powerful empire ever to grace us?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 11>
Poll Question: Wich empire could kill the rest?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
8 [15.09%]
20 [37.74%]
1 [1.89%]
3 [5.66%]
2 [3.77%]
3 [5.66%]
0 [0.00%]
4 [7.55%]
6 [11.32%]
4 [7.55%]
2 [3.77%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
Reginmund View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke


Joined: 08-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1943
  Quote Reginmund Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: What is the most powerful empire ever to grace us?
    Posted: 14-Oct-2008 at 17:59
Originally posted by IamJoseph

All human rights come from the OT - exclusively. Name me another source? All womens rights and animal rights also come from the OT.


No doubt the Bible played its part when the first declaration of universal human rights was written, but I would say the rationality of the enlightenment played a far greater role. If the OT was the sole source of human rights then we would still have irrational prohibitions against homosexuality and premarital sex among other things. In any case the NT provides a far better basis; the OT was what medieval kings cited when they needed to justify war, the NT just wasn't useful for that.

Originally posted by IamJoseph

Zealous [fastidious; requiring truth] The OT is true to history - ancient times were like that - nations engaged in wars of anihilation, out of a superstitition. The OT's historical stats are factual and vindicated - the NT is not, despite being 2000 years later.


Wild exaggeration. Any scholar in the field will tell you that the OT is a difficult source and that it's hard to determine how much we can actually know about the events it describes, and that's not even including the mythological aspects. I recall a friend of mine, an archaeologist, who specialises in this area and who has done much excavation work on the ruins of ancient Israel and Assyria. She maintains that we are dependent on archaeology because the OT is too unreliable.

This is of course disputed; there is the school of the minimalist scholars who believe the OT can tell us very little, and there is the school of the conservative biblical scholars who accept the veracity of most OT narratives. Neither school however believes the OT is completely historical, that much is established.

Originally posted by IamJoseph

More innocent humans were killed under the Gospels and in JC's name than any other - so how can you even assess the OT?


The historicity of the OT if not affected by how many people were killed in the name of NT. Weak deduction.

Originally posted by IamJoseph

Christianity does say that, and act out is deeds covertly today, at the UN:
 
'WE WILL NEVER SUPPORT THE RETURN OF THE JEWS TO *THEIR HOMELAND* - BECAUSE THEY REJECTED JESUS' - Pope not so Pious.
 
That is a genocidal doctrine, notwithstnding it also persecuted Jews in Europe. I doubt JC will tap him on the shoulder...he was not a christian u know!


Isn't it ironic then that modern Israel would be both Arab and Muslim today without intervention by the traditional Christian nations.

Originally posted by IamJoseph

Its correct that Rome went down. as did the Pharoahs - all roads did not lead there, and humanity was inclined in a wrong path. You should be hailing, not rediculing Jews for their stand against the world's greatest super-power: there is no greater example in history of the defense against Rome.


Actually there are several who not only made a stand but won.

Originally posted by IamJosephus

But you probably been fed the false versions of History the past 2000 years, and now appear shocked some alternative truths are emerging - but how can the NT & Quran both be true against their claims of the OT - they're mutually exclusive, in their beliefs as well their depictions of History, remember?


Absolutely. This is because all three works are part historical, legendary and mythological.
Back to Top
Goblin Monkey View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 11-Oct-2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 122
  Quote Goblin Monkey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2008 at 13:48
Poor little Russian empire hasnt got one vote.They where the third largest ever empire.
Is it just me or did your mom just wink at me?
Back to Top
IamJoseph View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 20-Sep-2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 296
  Quote IamJoseph Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2008 at 14:28
Russia's water gymnastics at the Beijing Olympics was a difference in kind than degree. There was no equavalence.
Moses - the First Zionist.
Back to Top
IamJoseph View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 20-Sep-2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 296
  Quote IamJoseph Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2008 at 15:05
No doubt the Bible played its part when the first declaration of universal human rights was written, but I would say the rationality of the enlightenment played a far greater role.
 
The enlightenment was a belated allignment of the OT laws, and a rebuff of its flaunting in Europe. Eventually, the OT laws were fully accepted in Europe's Institutions exclusively [accept the ritual laws], but called as COMMON LAW.
 
If the OT was the sole source of human rights
 
It may be confounding to you, but it sure is: name a law accepted by the world's Instituions which is not already contained in the 613 OT laws? None come from the NT or Quran - so don't look there.
 
 
 then we would still have irrational prohibitions against homosexuality
 
The OT is not wrong here. Gay is an existential issue more than a moral or an individual rights issue: if 20% of the world pop became gay, humanity would not survive after a few generations. This makes the gay issue even more precarious than incest; nor would incest be negatable once gay is sanctioned by the judiciary. Gay rights is good; equal gay rights is not good for gays.
 
 and premarital sex among other things.
 
This is unquestionably in the OT laws' favour. Even the issue of celibacy is wrong, specially so for one in a position of advocating proper relations - without first hand evidential example. The OT says: IT IS NOT GOOD FOR MAN TO BE ALONE. This premise is vindicated best in the church's failings.
 
In any case the NT provides a far better basis; the OT was what medieval kings cited when they needed to justify war, the NT just wasn't useful for that.
 
Exactly the reverse applies. There is simply no basis for this, and no laws assuming this in the NT. Even the touted premise of love, presented generically and abstractly as a new [?] answer to all and everything, is not illustrated or defined. In contrast, the OT gives the inherent mechanics of love:
 
The first moral/ethical law is HONESTY [3rd C]; followed by RESPECT/HONOR [5th C]. This is of course the correct pre-requisites of a real love: for what  kind of love is it where there is no honesty and respect as its foundation?
 
The OT criteria for love is superior: LOVE THE STRANGER, as opposed LOVE THY NEIGHBOUR. The former is more demanding and selfless, while the latter ican be self servicing. Significantly, there is no merit for love of parents and kin, because this is biological and involuntary; thus the command to HONOR THY PARENTS - which calls for respect even in a discourse.
 
Love is not exclusive to the heart [emotions], by which one can soon go astray. It is best when it incorporates other fulcrum faculties: AND YOU SHALL THE LORD WITH ALL YOUR HEART AND ALL YOUR MIND AND ALL YOUR SOUL. The OT understands the nature of man.
 
Dont believe everything you believe.
Moses - the First Zionist.
Back to Top
Seko View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar
Spammer

Joined: 01-Sep-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8595
  Quote Seko Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2008 at 15:14
So, after reading all of your posts IamJoseph there is nothing left for us good citizens of the world to do but repudiate our current beliefs, pick up the pages of the bible only relating to  the old testament and become Jewish.
 
Old testament laws are an empire are they? Or were old testament laws existant in the worlds most powerful empire to grace us?
Back to Top
Reginmund View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke


Joined: 08-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1943
  Quote Reginmund Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2008 at 15:22
I feel like I'm talking to the Western Wall here.

First of all I have never heard it claimed by any scholar that the Enlightenment was a "alignment" of OT laws. Second you ignore the heritage of Roman law, Rome's perhaps greatest contribution to human civilization.

There is no point in naming any laws for in my experience religious people are experts at interpreting (read: twisting) anything to fit with their scripture.

Gay is not an existential issue at all because homosexuality will never occur naturally in as many as 20% of the population. If so it would have happened a long time ago regardless of any laws.

I don't see how premarital sex makes a man alone or celibate, it's quite the opposite. If you're that concerned about populating the already overpopulated earth you should be in favour of any kind of sex as long as it's unprotected.

And your last sentence is a paradox and not a particularly clever one.
Back to Top
IamJoseph View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 20-Sep-2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 296
  Quote IamJoseph Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2008 at 17:14
I don't see how premarital sex makes a man alone or celibate, it's quite the opposite. If you're that concerned about populating the already overpopulated earth you should be in favour of any kind of sex as long as it's unprotected.
 
Perhaps you should see how a bigger picture applies. The over-population factor may in fact be the only one which saves humanity than any other - nor is this the reason behind premarital sex , no matter how sanctimoniously one wants to cushion it. We are also all subject to the same criteria of the most powerful force impacting on us, and none will be able to resist its temptation when push comes to shove [its not money which makes the hormones go round!].
 
If one sees the future outcome of humanity and this planet, say 500 or 5000 years ahead - our population will be in the trillions, no matter how many birth control and other measures adopted. These only pushes the goal post further at best. Eventually, we have to 'GO HAVE DOMINION OF THE WORLDS' [not a supefluous verse in Genesis!] - with no options around it. And it is only a vast and more pronounced population explosion which will compell this outcome. It is of course a mistep to focus on climate, when we should be designing ET fashion attire and structures to live on the Moon and Mars - because there is no choice factor here, once we go past the immediate self limitation tresholds limited to the next few decades only. Planet earth is the first step of humanity - not the one and final one. Look out there - ask why and what for this vast empty universal backyard - then ponder how nothing in the universe is superfluous and there is a blatant display of awesome wisdom in its engineerings and structures!
 
One can see humans wearing a Modona style mouth piece gadget which would regulate a suitable oxygen mix, and hi-tech footware which counters gravity - enabling humans and animals to walk hands free - just like Madona on stage. Then moonbases will be commonplace for communities and even nations. Thereafter, there is no population problem, and the horizon of space becomes very sparsely populated indeed. All thanks to the population prompts feared today.
 
The OT has never been wrong yet. Its a mysterious document. There is only much apprehension of seeing it anew, namely differently from how it was presented to the world via Christianity and Islam: two sources which never observed or experienced its hidden wisdom ever - because they assumed Israel was no more after 70 CE. This was an error - and you guys will get around it in time, even if dragging and cussing and fussing about it. It is not so hard to take on board: for sure both the NT & Quran cannot be right - one has to be 100% wrong, because they contradict each on fundamental factors - even in historical criteria. So there is not much of a choice factor here.
 
Ultimately, the solutions for humanity can only come from a source which possesses it - whatever that may be. New age science - the latest diety and belief system, was actually introduced in genesis - with the first introduction of the universe being finite - which had to make one think what that means. If the NT made any sense, I would surely harken - but there is nothingness there - not a squeek about what impacts science, history, geography, space, future problems staring at us - zilch. It just speaks of Jesus and son - not the sun, and this only results in a blank look when this becomes bewilderingly irrelevent.
 
So my reasonings are hardly vested in theological factors, and I see the OT as more than just another theological piece - it is a pivotal factor of chunks of history which is not available elsewhere, of science, judiciary, geography and the whole kaboodle. Give me a half decent premise from the NT and Quran, and I'll harken. I'd be a fool not to. But it is pointless to reject something based on your own beliefs, as opposed to the pursuit of truth and sound reasonings. I have nothing against any belief system - its only the other way around. Check some history and geography?


Edited by IamJoseph - 16-Oct-2008 at 17:19
Moses - the First Zionist.
Back to Top
IamJoseph View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 20-Sep-2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 296
  Quote IamJoseph Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2008 at 17:28
So, after reading all of your posts IamJoseph there is nothing left for us good citizens of the world to do but repudiate our current beliefs, pick up the pages of the bible only relating to  the old testament and become Jewish. 
 
'There is wisdom and rightious in all nations and all places'
 
because:
 
'THE UNIVERSE WAS CREATED IN WISDOM'
 
...And wisdom is a place.
 
Please forgive me if that blatant logic comes from the Hebrew bible.
Moses - the First Zionist.
Back to Top
Reginmund View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke


Joined: 08-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1943
  Quote Reginmund Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2008 at 17:31
So the conclusion is we should colonize space and create a galactic Jewish empire. Well I for one is glad we cleared that up.
Back to Top
IamJoseph View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 20-Sep-2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 296
  Quote IamJoseph Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2008 at 17:46
So the conclusion is we should colonize space
 
As opposed to....WHAT ELSE? - faster and more efficient de-pops and more powerful contraceptions? For how long? Then what? The china syndrome will soon have the west screaming blue murder if their right to not have a child or to have one - is messed with.
 
 
Your problem is hardly the miniscule dot of a Jewish empire. 2B Christians and 1.2B Muslims are going to have a face off - that will be a far more exciting affair. One rests on resurrection, the other denies it. And both claim to rule the world by their being the only acceptable path for humanity - and woe unto those who disagree. With issues of land - who's going to tell Muslims not to repro - and where will they fit when the west becomes negative population based? And there's nothing in the Hebrew bible which even mentions any of your two - the space time factor ensures this.
 
Call me when you two have decided if Jesus was a palestinian and the Jewish temple a myth - because these negate your gospels.
 
Life is what happens to you while your busy making other plans.
Moses - the First Zionist.
Back to Top
Goblin Monkey View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 11-Oct-2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 122
  Quote Goblin Monkey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Oct-2008 at 00:23
IamJoseph, please stop talking relgion.This is Earths most powerful empire.NOT the relgion forum.Please go some whre else for that.
Is it just me or did your mom just wink at me?
Back to Top
IamJoseph View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 20-Sep-2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 296
  Quote IamJoseph Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Oct-2008 at 02:10
Ok, I'll go somewhere else. But I was not talking religion, just 101 history and logic. The most powerful empire cannot be one which is not around anymore, while one it went to war with, is. Is that religion too? You can sort that one out between yourselves.
Moses - the First Zionist.
Back to Top
Goblin Monkey View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 11-Oct-2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 122
  Quote Goblin Monkey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Oct-2008 at 02:45
Shoo, go, faster!
Is it just me or did your mom just wink at me?
Back to Top
Count Belisarius View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Magister Militum

Joined: 25-Jul-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1109
  Quote Count Belisarius Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Oct-2008 at 04:43
Guys I think you both need to calm down and apologize before you both get BANNED! thats B-A-N-N-E-D!


Defenders of Ulthuan, Cult of Asuryan (57 Kills and counting)


Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Oct-2008 at 05:01
Originally posted by IamJoseph

So the conclusion is we should colonize space
 
As opposed to....WHAT ELSE? - faster and more efficient de-pops and more powerful contraceptions? For how long? Then what? The china syndrome will soon have the west screaming blue murder if their right to not have a child or to have one - is messed with.
 
 
Your problem is hardly the miniscule dot of a Jewish empire. 2B Christians and 1.2B Muslims are going to have a face off - that will be a far more exciting affair. One rests on resurrection, the other denies it. And both claim to rule the world by their being the only acceptable path for humanity - and woe unto those who disagree. With issues of land - who's going to tell Muslims not to repro - and where will they fit when the west becomes negative population based? And there's nothing in the Hebrew bible which even mentions any of your two - the space time factor ensures this.
 
Call me when you two have decided if Jesus was a palestinian and the Jewish temple a myth - because these negate your gospels.
 
Life is what happens to you while your busy making other plans.


Now you're a sage, too?


Star
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Oct-2008 at 05:02
Originally posted by Reginmund

So the conclusion is we should colonize space and create a galactic Jewish empire. Well I for one is glad we cleared that up.


Tongue
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Oct-2008 at 05:03
Originally posted by IamJoseph

So, after reading all of your posts IamJoseph there is nothing left for us good citizens of the world to do but repudiate our current beliefs, pick up the pages of the bible only relating to  the old testament and become Jewish. 
 
'There is wisdom and rightious in all nations and all places'
 
because:
 
'THE UNIVERSE WAS CREATED IN WISDOM'
 
...And wisdom is a place.
 
Please forgive me if that blatant logic comes from the Hebrew bible.


Yes and Creationism apparently is logical, too. Anyway obviously this is a non-theological thread as the OP wanted a temporal discussion of Empires.
Back to Top
IamJoseph View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 20-Sep-2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 296
  Quote IamJoseph Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Oct-2008 at 08:41
Yes and Creationism apparently is logical, too. Anyway obviously this is a non-theological thread as the OP wanted a temporal discussion of Empires.
 
While there is no dispute theology and history are seperate realms and should not be inter-related here, allow me to clarify the applicable factors which impact what is theology and what is reality - namely what transcends theology and is deemed reality.
 
If a premise is accepted and enshrined with the current times' judiciary and civic Institutions - it is historical - regardless of its source. The US Constitution and the Judiciary - are not theologies but realities. If a theology says murder is a punishable crime, or one day per week is free of work, or an accusation which cannot be proven amounts to slander or equal justice for all - it is not theological myth anymore but a valid reality same as the theory of relativity or gravity. By the same criteria, if a theology says turn the other cheek, or one is an infidel - and these are not accepted in the judiciary as a law - that is not a reality today, and markedly varied. From this pov, my positions were historically based and a manifest reality today.
 
Here, 'shhh - go away' is not a debated responsa, but an I LOSE admission, and I don't feel alligned as being equally bannable because someone cannot differentiate between belief based theology, and historically based reality.
 
Creationism is not theology, as in belief; there is no scientific counter to it. It stands till some one shouts eureka! Creationism is an alternative reality. Hint: it is top of every forum debate side by side with any science - marking its difference from belief based theologies.
 
Rome was a depraved bulldog which declined humanity; the precedent Greek empire was greater and contributed much more. Tarred roads was only a tool to futher Roman attrocities quicker and more resourcefully. Humanity does not honor anything learnt from the Romans: Catholicism should seriously think of dropping this prefix - same as it did its heresy doctrine. Not reality anymore. I would nominate N. America as perhaps the greatest empire - worts and all she wins hands down.


Edited by IamJoseph - 17-Oct-2008 at 08:47
Moses - the First Zionist.
Back to Top
Reginmund View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke


Joined: 08-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1943
  Quote Reginmund Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Oct-2008 at 10:05
Originally posted by IamJoseph

Rome was a depraved bulldog which declined humanity; the precedent Greek empire was greater and contributed much more. Tarred roads was only a tool to futher Roman attrocities quicker and more resourcefully. Humanity does not honor anything learnt from the Romans: Catholicism should seriously think of dropping this prefix - same as it did its heresy doctrine. Not reality anymore. I would nominate N. America as perhaps the greatest empire - worts and all she wins hands down.


You are aware, of course, that the US political institution is inspired by the Roman republic. There are other parallels as well.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/sep/18/usa.comment
Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Oct-2008 at 11:08
Originally posted by Count Belisarius

Guys I think you both need to calm down and apologize before you both get BANNED! thats B-A-N-N-E-D!
 
Why both?
 
IAmJoseph is the one who hi-jacked the thread to his favourite and somewhat boring topic. Everybody else is quite right. Apart from being nonsense (which is not against the principles of the forum in general Smile since we have a special place for it) his contributions are completely off-topic, which is against the principles of the forum.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 11>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.