Saudi response to Wilders.

Schism � Saudi Blogger's Answer to Wilders Film
Ebtihal Mubarak, Arab News



JEDDAH, 10 April 2008 � A Saudi blogger has made a six-minute video entitled "Schism" by portraying texts from Christian sources out of context, similar to the way Dutch MP Geert Wilders made his recently-released anti-Qur'an film entitled "Fitna."

In his film, Raid Al-Saeed, 33, shows verses of the Bible that call for war and illustrated them with clips of extremist Christian groups that preach violence.

"I made it in less than 24 hours. In 'Schism,' I have used the same methodology that Wilders has used and that involves taking texts out of context," he told Arab News, adding that he made the film to prove that it is incorrect to judge Islam by watching "Fitna."

This is a point that he writes at the end of his short film. "It is easy to take part of any holy book out of context and make it sound like an inhumane book. This is what Geert Wilders did to gather supporters for his hateful ideology. To create 'Schism,'" he wrote.

Al-Saeed does not believe religious books call for violence and bloodshed. He said "Fitna" is "based on hate" and that Wilders has abused the "freedom of expression that he enjoys." He added that Wilders' movie reflects "his racism and hatred."

When Al-Saeed first posted his clip on YouTube on March 1, the video was removed within 12 hours with a message from the site that the clip violated its terms.

Al-Saeed wrote back to YouTube, asking why the movie was removed while "Fitna" remained available. He uploaded the film again and added a message for the site's administrators advising them to view Wilders' film before deleting the film.

His video has been viewed over 1,800 times and has been on YouTube since March 2. It is also available for viewing on Google.

Al-Saeed insists that his aim is not to spread hate but to tell the world that you cannot judge a religion or an ideology by taking things out of context.

Arab News
http://www.arabnews.com/?page=1&sectio...ategory=Kingdom

Edited by Sparten - 12-Apr-2008 at 16:45

Sorry Paul, no links are allowed.

Yes, why? besides, it is tremendously easy to find it using any whatsoever search engine, so what difference can make?

""I made it in less than 24 hours. In 'Schism,' I have used the same methodology that Wilders has used and that involves taking texts out of context," he told Arab News, adding that he made the film to prove that it is incorrect to judge Islam by watching "Fitna.""

I will argue that both sides are guilty, but Islam has the greatest chance of being mis-represented! That is, any defence of Islam has to over come some passages, that just can not be "taken out of context!"

The Hebrew Old Testament does not come any where close! Now, later additions by Hebrew scholars, changed that a great deal! They were then and now, open racists, etc.!

But, the word of the "Quran" cannot be modified or extroplated! It is "written", and it is hateful and racist also! And to deny it is to assume the rest of the world is "ignorant!"

But, just what do we (the rest of the world) know?

I can assume that Middle Age Jewish experts could come up with a bunch of hatefull shit, which changes the Christian view of the Old Testament, but it is not allowed in Islam!

What you read (in the Quran), is "exactly" what is meant! That is the "Law!", and as such that is the "Word!"

In the so called Christian World, there is no verse that can be thought to overcome this "Love thy neighbor as thy self!" A real "order!"

Regards,



Edited by opuslola - 25-May-2010 at 17:48