Originally posted by Explorer
food for thought - following is a quote from "Lovelock and Spirit cave mummies. Over 9,000 years old, and Caucasoid. Located in same area where ancient Paiute Indian legends say the Paiutes “exterminated” a light skinned, red haired tribe who spoke a different language in ancient times" so how does one "lay" claim to someone they "exterminated" as his ancestor -- ???? --- and the plot thickens --
|
Doesn't matter in the end. As many of the Paiutes and numerous members of others tribes were and still remain not convinced of the effectiveness of NAGPRA, ARPA, and NMAIA for that matter. Insofar as it adequately addressed their cultural representation concerns. And for that matter many of them felt it was another example of a forced requirement even if one believes it adequately addressed their concerns versus the interests of Historians, Anthro's and other Social Sciences....who maintain it restricts research and study.
This like most of the controversies that led to the aforementioned laws is just another example of the tribe representing it's interests and positions to ensure they remain recognized.
Whether you or I believe the following, from the law, to be realistic remains moot.
"strike a balance between the interest in scientific examination of skeletal remains and the recognition that Native Americans, like people from every culture around the world, have a religious and spiritual reverence for the remains of their ancestors''
Recommend the following for those interested.
Repatriation Reader: Who Owns American Indian Remains?
www.public.asu.edu/~kintigh/KintighOnNAGPRA.pdf