USA vs. USSR in 1945

The RAF would more than make up for any American numerical deficiency in Europe with respect to airpower.  Yes its US v. USSR but I don�t see the UK sitting on the sidelines.

Now lets see, a superior training structure, better support, superior numbers, miniaturized radio�s in USAF and British fighters in a far greater percentage of fighters in service(This results in a huge advantage with respect to coordination), and superior fighter designs(The US and British were already rolling jet powered fighters off the assembly lines). 

My money�s on the combined USAF and RAF pulling complete air superiority.

Well since you�re such an expert on that affair please tell me, what effect did bombing the bridges across the Yalu, or for that matter the bombing of Air Bases and supply areas in China?  Oh my mistake none of those things actually happened( well ok the USAF and USN were permitted to bomb the �Korean side� of the bridges on the Yalu which led to a rather ineffective bombing campaign.  But the US never attacked the Chinese transport structure inside of China. 

BTW American pilots flying F-86 Sabre�s managed a superior kill ratio over Soviet pilots in there Mig-15s despite the Mig�s superior performance, as it turned out the more aggressive tactical doctrine used by US pilots proved more effective(Granted tactics perfected by the Luftwaffe helped a lot, as the often outnumbered Sabre pilots relied heavily upon the �finger four� formation.

Besides you�re comparing apples and oranges here, the highly mechanized Soviet Army would have been far more vulnerable to an interdiction campaign that the Armies China had sent into Korea and the American bomber fleets of Korea were miniscule compared to those the USAF had in Europe alone during WWII.

Im not saying that conventional bombing will win a war, but it can certainly make meaningful ground offensive by mechanized forces nigh impossible.  This certainly would have been the case if US and British Commanders pulled back to the Rhine in the face of a Soviet offensive.  The real question in this scenario is can the Soviet�s obtain complete surprise, if they can I see little chance for the allies to hold off the red army, lest logistical capacity should become overly stretched as it reached into western Europe.  Yet if the US and British could form a defense at the Rhine then it would only be a matter of time the Soviet Union crumbled.

During the early stages of the war on the Eastern front entire Soviet Armies were being slaughtered and yet the USSR still stubbornly kept a substantial force in Eastern Siberia� Pray do explain why

U overestimate the Big Six, everything I�ve ever read has suggested or said that it was not the success of the Soviet�s in Manchuria, which was quickly dismissed, but the end to Soviet Neutrality.  Even still up until the bombing of Hiroshima at least half of the 6 clung to the notion of the final showdown.  That during the invasion of Japan the Japanese would inflict enough casualties on the American military so as to destroy American morale and perhaps negotiate favorable terms.  It was the bomb that quashed this idea, immediately Hiroshima it became more a question of how to surrender with the more hawkish faction leaning towards a negotiated peace by using Russia as an intermediary.