Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Justinian
Chieftain
King of Númenor
Joined: 11-Nov-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Time for anarchy ? Posted: 02-Oct-2007 at 05:57 |
Originally posted by vulkan02
Originally posted by nuvolari
Given that the eminent Chinese Prof. Kang Xiaoguang has stated of his fellow Chinese that :-
"They are just hundreds and millions of peasants and workers, they don't count- you can rob them and exploit them. It's not a problem."
and that the view of western governments towards their citizens seems to echo his sentiments, should we not consider that the time is rife for revolution or anarchy ?
Nuvolari |
Totally agree! The dysgenic administrative, social and business super-structures that we have build today help keep the ever more corrupt and wealthy people in high positions. These systems must be destroyed and burned to the ground but the end result of it and what the revolutionaries wish to achieve must be carefully planned and coordinated in advance, or else it will breed something worse that what we already have.
Honestly though, it has reached such a point that to watch it crumble(from a safe distance) is just a matter of time rather than doubting its occurrence. Burn baby burn!
|
Well said indeed.
|
"War is a cowardly escape from the problems of peace."--Thomas Mann
|
|
gcle2003
King
Suspended
Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Oct-2007 at 11:45 |
Originally posted by Praetor
Anarchy would not result in a better state in the long term,
|
Or even the short term.
only huge amounts of blood letting in the short term as without the rule of law, force rules and as such anarchy can not last but will be replaced by Warlords (as force rules and eventually someone would be powerful enough to act as a government) who will establish "order" by force.
Regards, Praetor.
|
|
|
gcle2003
King
Suspended
Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Oct-2007 at 11:48 |
Originally posted by vulkan02
These systems must be destroyed and burned to the ground but the end result of it and what the revolutionaries wish to achieve must be carefully planned and coordinated in advance, or else it will breed something worse that what we already have.
|
So you are not advocating anarchy, but dictatorship by people you agree with?
|
|
Praetor
Consul
Suspended
Joined: 26-Jun-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 386
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Oct-2007 at 12:20 |
Originally posted by gcle2003
Originally posted by Praetor
Anarchy would not result in a better state in the long term,
|
Or even the short term. |
I completely agree hence what I say next:
Originally posted by Praetor
only huge amounts of blood letting in the short term |
Regards, Praetor.
Edited by Praetor - 02-Oct-2007 at 12:21
|
|
Ulrich Wolff
Samurai
Joined: 21-Sep-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 121
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Oct-2007 at 19:36 |
The only service anarchy may provide is to act like a wild fire to burn away a corrupt society, and it would have to be VERY corrupt for it to be beneficial.
|
|
ulrich von hutten
Tsar
Court Jester
Joined: 01-Nov-2005
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3638
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Oct-2007 at 20:32 |
(Anarchy is working, Mr. Shirking)
|
|
|
pekau
Caliph
Atlantean Prophet
Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Oct-2007 at 22:32 |
I favor anarchy... but who will replace the Communist Party? Who will organize millions of Chinese to revolt? How would they be motivated, since most of Chinese are used to government oppression? Who will enforce the new leaders? This is like French Revolution to me... and I most definitely do not want Chinese Napoleon to take over.
|
Join us.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Oct-2007 at 23:47 |
Why the French/Corsican one wasn't so bad
|
|
Ulrich Wolff
Samurai
Joined: 21-Sep-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 121
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 09-Oct-2007 at 16:54 |
Operation Chinese Freedom
Rofl.
|
|
gcle2003
King
Suspended
Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2007 at 15:38 |
Originally posted by pekau
I favor anarchy... but who will replace the Communist Party? Who will organize millions of Chinese to revolt? How would they be motivated, since most of Chinese are used to government oppression? Who will enforce the new leaders? |
If it's anarchy, there won't be any leaders. That's rather the point.
This is like French Revolution to me... and I most definitely do not want Chinese Napoleon to take over. |
|
|
Ulrich Wolff
Samurai
Joined: 21-Sep-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 121
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2007 at 19:00 |
Anarchy will happen only when the Chinese become very, very angry. Even then it'll probably be snuffed out by the military in a matter of moments.
|
|
pekau
Caliph
Atlantean Prophet
Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2007 at 23:42 |
Originally posted by Ulrich Wolff
Anarchy will happen only when the Chinese become very, very angry. Even then it'll probably be snuffed out by the military in a matter of moments. |
Great, so we just need to smuggle some angry drugs into rice fields... and all's according to plan...
|
Join us.
|
|