Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Pre-Christian Poland?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Rava View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 166
  Quote Rava Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Pre-Christian Poland?
    Posted: 25-Aug-2004 at 16:02

Kneze, Kneź, in arabic sources gnez, in one relation khagan Rus. In Poland also książę or ksiądz, kniądz and kniaź. It's interesting that ksiądz was latter transfered to name any christian priest. In my opinion książę might remain old IE kshiatria.

Back to Top
boody4 View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 130
  Quote boody4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Aug-2004 at 00:21
Did they teach you in Polish history class though a bit about pre-christian Poland?
Back to Top
Sarmata View Drop Down
Consul
Consul

suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 314
  Quote Sarmata Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Aug-2004 at 17:57
ok, pre-christian Poland, during my tirp to Poland this summer I picked up some books, one ofthem was "Poczet krolow i ksiazat", it has a list of King's before Christian Poland emerged, hope you can udnerstand Polish good: KRAK- Maz szlachetny, biegly w walce, jako pierwszy z Polakow obrany krolem, podjawszy walke z Gallami, wyslanymi tu przez krola Aswerusa, pokonal ich.
W owym czasie smok zostal zgladzony na skale przez mlodszego syna krola Kraka. Ow nastepnie dopuscil sie bratobojstwa, za co potem zostal pozbawiony korony w Polsce i nie objal wladzy po ojcu.
WANDA- Corka Kraka, ktora zwyciezywszy krola Lemanow nie poslubila go, a skladajac ofiare bogom o pomyslnosc i szczescie narodu a wlasnej wole rzucila sie do Wisly.
Za panowania Wandy Polacy od imienia wladczyni zostali nazywani Wandalami. Przez sto lat Polacy nie mieli Krola.
LESZKO- Pierwszy, bezpotomny maz, biegly w sztuce zlotniczej, podstepem zwyciezyl Aleksandra Wielkiego pod Lysa Gora. W jego czasach Aleksander Wielki w walce z Polakami poniosl sromotna kleske, po czym zaniechal dalszego pustoszenia kraju i odstapil w pokoju.
LESZKO- Drugi, maz skromny, zwyciezyl innych w wyscigu do mety; w nagrode za zwyciestwo zostal wybrany korlem. Ow byl chwalony z powodu czterech cnot a mianowicie: mestwa, hojnosci, wstrzemiezliwosci i pokory.
LESZKO- Trzeci, jedyny syn Leszka Drugiego, trzykrotnie pokonal Juliusza Cezara. Ten polaczyl sie z nim wiezami przyjazni: oddal mu za zone swa siostre Julie, ktora urodzila Leszkowi dwudziestu synow. W owych czasach Chrystus narodzil sie w Betlejem, a Oktawian, syn siostrzenicy Juliusza Cezara przyjal godnosc imperatora.
POPIEL- Pierworodny syn Leszka Trzeciego, najstarszy sposrod dwudziestu braci.
POPIEL- Wnuk Leszka Trzeciego, syn Popiela. Jego wraz z zona i dwoma synami zjadly myszy w wiezy kruszwickiego grodu. Byl rowniez zwany Chosciskiem. Wtedy to Krol Popiel otrul dwudziestu braci ojca, dla ktorych sam byl bratankiem, oni zas jego stryjami.
PIAST- Ubogi rolnik z Kruszwicy, przez meczennikow Jana i Pawla w cudowny sposob zostal wyniesiony na krola, gdy rod Popiela wyginal ze szczetem. Od jego panowania bierze poczatek nowa dynastia krolow.
SIEMOWIT- Jedyny syn Piasta, niezwykle laskawy i energiczny; zawsze odnosil triumfalne zwyciestwo nad wrogiem. Ow Siemowit odzyskal wiele utraconych ziem, uwazano, ze we wszystkich przedsiewzieciach sprzyjalo mu szczescie, wykazywal sie przedsiebiorczoscia i zawsze dzialal z pomyslnym skutkiem.
LESZKO- Czwarty, syn Siemowita. We wszystkich poczynaniach wstepowal w slady ojca.
SIEMOMYSL- Syn Leszka Czwartego, ktory nad wszystkimi ziemiami i poddanymi swemu wladztwu panowal w pokoju.
....the other are the Christain Kings, Mieszko and so on. You may o may not believe what it says aboutt hese kings, but thats what it says in the book.
Back to Top
Scytho-Sarmatian View Drop Down
Earl
Earl
Avatar

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 290
  Quote Scytho-Sarmatian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Aug-2004 at 02:20

Sarmata-

If you could give just a short translation into English of some of the highlights of the selection, it would be greatly appreciated!

My Polish is limited to "Hi, how are you?" and that sort of thing.

Back to Top
Sarmata View Drop Down
Consul
Consul

suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 314
  Quote Sarmata Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Aug-2004 at 13:14
Somehow I saw that coming, yeah Imnot gonna go word for word with it but I'll sum them up ok so i got the book form Poland history of Kings and princes of Poland. And they have this list of past Kings...and here we go..
KRAK- a nobel man, good warrior, first of the Poles to be chosen as King, fought against Gauls(? if someone knows from POlish Gallami help me out, Im assuming it's Gaus, in Latin it's Gallis)anyways they were sent by there king Aswerus, Krak defeated them. Kraks son would be the conqueror of the dragon which I assume you hear in Polish folklore, he would not be the next King after his father becuase he killed his own brother.
WANDA-Kraks Daughter, she was supposed to marry the King of Lemanow( Germans), but she refused and sacrificed her self to the Gods by throwing herself in the Wisla (Vistula). After the reign of Wanda the Poles called themselves Wandalami(Wandals, Vandals). For 100 years the Poles werw without a King.
LESZKO- The first,he defeated Alexander the Great under Lysa Gora.(yeah I know hard to believe, and it may be unrealistic, but it's what it says, and no where in this book does it say legendary kings or mythical)After Alexander lost to the Poles he left the country in peace.
LESZKO- The second, defeated others in a race to Meta(?).As victor he was chosen as King. he was very honorable he had 4 traits that was very famous for, I can't translate them dammit.
LESZKO- The third, the only son of Leszko II, three times he defeated Julius Caesar. They later became good aquiantances and Caesar gave Leszko as his wife his sister Julia which gave birth to 20 sons for Leszko. Elsewhere around the same time Christ is born in Bethlehem. Oktavian somehow related to Caesar gets in good witht he empire(dont know how to translate that one too good).
POPIEL- first born son of Leszko III, the oldest amongst 20 brothers.
POPIEL-grandson of Leszko III, son of Popiel.He was eaten along with his wife and kids by mice in the tower of Kruszwickiego. He was later called Choscisko(if you watched Stara Basn you can maybe make some connections here). He killed all of his fathers brothers by poisoning them.
PIAST-He was chosen by some Martyrs I guess, Jan and Pawel to be King, when Popiel and his heirs all died out.
From him starts a new Dynasty of Kings.
SIEMOWIT- Piasts only son, unnaturally full of energy, and sincere. He always brought about great victories against his enemies. Siemowit regained lots of lost territory.
LESZKO- The fourth, son of Siemowit. he followed in his fathers footsteps with everything he did.
SIEMOMYSL- son of Leszko IV, he had reigned in peace.
and thats it the rest are Mieszko which was the one who accepted christianity,a nd thats that, interesting to hear though that Mieszko was born blind, after 7 years though he would be able to see.
Back to Top
Mosquito View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Suspended

Joined: 05-Aug-2004
Location: Sarmatia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2537
  Quote Mosquito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Aug-2004 at 16:41
anyway this book must be the worst garbage i ever heard about.
Back to Top
boody4 View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 130
  Quote boody4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Sep-2004 at 16:54
Are the Kings you mentioned considered to be "Piast" or it's only Piast who started that royal bloodline. And can you answer my question about Stara Basn, why did they call Popiel something Piastoca(or something close to that) and there's a guy named Piastun and then there's Siemovit? That really confused me.
Back to Top
Sarmata View Drop Down
Consul
Consul

suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 314
  Quote Sarmata Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Sep-2004 at 00:13
Im not 100% sure but I think they called Siemowit Piastun, as a last anme thing I dont remember them calling some other guy piastun, I may be wrong, havent watched the movie for a while, though now thta I think about it they might have called Daniel Olbrychski Piastun, so Im not sure aboutt hat one myself. and yeah that Piast Era began with Piast, the others were a different dynasty Im guessing.
Back to Top
TJK View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 367
  Quote TJK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Sep-2004 at 14:02

Sarmata, all this - let say - " legends" came from the  chronicle of Wincenty Kadubek

In fact earlier Gall Anonim chronicle   is much more trustworthy..

Back to Top
Sarmata View Drop Down
Consul
Consul

suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 314
  Quote Sarmata Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Sep-2004 at 15:00
You're probably right, but I listed those Kings because they were "pre-christian", true or not, I dont know, that's for yourself to decide. But Gall Annonim was a chronicler of Poland after it was christian was he not?
Back to Top
boody4 View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 130
  Quote boody4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Sep-2004 at 19:18
Yes Olbrzychski was Piastun and that younger actor that I don't remember the name was Siemowit.
Back to Top
Sarmata View Drop Down
Consul
Consul

suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 314
  Quote Sarmata Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Sep-2004 at 00:08
The Piasts originally consisted of four "legendary princes" who ruled the four main territories around the Vistula river. The princes were Piast, Siemowit, Leszek, and Siemomysl. They were reportedly peasants who were entrusted with the rule of Poland by God because of their hard work and piousness. It was from these princes that Mieszko I was said to have descended (either as a son or fifth brother, depending on the source.)
So that mmight explain why one of them was siemowit the other was Piastun, or w/e, thats the only thing I can think of.
Back to Top
boody4 View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 130
  Quote boody4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2004 at 22:48
Ok thats a logical answer..
Back to Top
cavalry4ever View Drop Down
AE Moderator
AE Moderator
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator Emeritus

Joined: 17-Nov-2004
Location: Virginia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 589
  Quote cavalry4ever Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jan-2005 at 18:07
Originally posted by Lohendrin

I take interest in Polish history only in the period after 963, the year when Prince Mieszko had to adopt Christianity for Poland (or else face the Teutonic extermination). To me, the idea Poland without Christianity makes no sense whatsoever.

By the way, I am your fellow but regrettably not your fellow Polanie.


There are no Teutonic Knights in Poland at that time. Holly Roman Empire is the main threat. This is why Mieszko took Christianity from Czech kingdom.
Back to Top
Mosquito View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Suspended

Joined: 05-Aug-2004
Location: Sarmatia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2537
  Quote Mosquito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jan-2005 at 19:41

Originally posted by cavalry4ever

There are no Teutonic Knights in Poland at that time. Holly Roman Empire is the main threat. This is why Mieszko took Christianity from Czech kingdom.

 

Well, actually he was baptised in Regensburg (Germany). He just didnt want to do anything with Saxons.

Back to Top
tzar View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 02-Jan-2005
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 472
  Quote tzar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 08:46
Excuse me, can I ask you a question (not about this topic, but it is about the Poles)
Are you  slavs or not?!
Back to Top
Rava View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 166
  Quote Rava Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 09:01

Originally posted by tzar

Excuse me, can I ask you a question (not about this topic, but it is about the Poles)
Are you  slavs or not?!

 "slavs" difinitely not. Slavs rather not. Anyway what about you Kutriugurs?

Back to Top
tzar View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 02-Jan-2005
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 472
  Quote tzar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 09:04
what does "kutriugust" mean?
Back to Top
Rava View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 166
  Quote Rava Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 10:05
Kutriguri, Onoguri - proto-Bulgars.
Back to Top
tzar View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 02-Jan-2005
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 472
  Quote tzar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2005 at 15:00
The word "onoduri" I've heard it somewhere, but in Bulgarian it sounds differently. Those who you are speaking about are assimilated long long time ago. Historians says that we are slavs.
thanks
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.117 seconds.