Genghis and Hitler

t"he Chingiz lovers don't approve the many killings, it's just that Chingiz killed so many because the other conquerors were less sucessful."  Hitler was also realy succsesfull, at the begining.

Where is the difference, both tried to rule the world, and humans were worthless for both, Chingiz Khan killed also people wich rebelled, hitler the same. And both killed People due to a personal Opinion Chingis killed Tartarians, because he revanged his fathers deth, Hitler isolated people because he considered them as parasites or varmits then 1941 (after the losing of the Battles, Moska, Stalingrad was clear the war ist lost) then he had a choice let them go or kill them.

The same ruthless Bastards.

I wonder what one would say about Hitler if the Third Reich succeeded and won World War II.......................................

Who knows?  The victors are praised, and the losers demonized. 

But yes, I would say that Genghis Khan should not be compared directly to Hitler.  Hitler killed based on ethnicity and race, while Genghis Khan only killed to ensure that his Mongol warriors achieved victory.

Hitler is the hunter who kills indulgently, while Genghis Khan is the hunter who kills only when necessity calls.

Are there any Hitler lovers and Hitler admirers? who are they?

And reason?

Because i see a lot Chingis-Lovers(as someone described) here! Isn`t it enought to show difference between them?

Thanks...