Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Turk Nomad
Shogun
suspended
Joined: 11-Sep-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 228
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Ottoman army Posted: 10-Oct-2006 at 10:59 |
Why you laughing?Ever battled with Turks?No =)
|
|
xi_tujue
Arch Duke
Atabeg
Joined: 19-May-2006
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1919
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Oct-2006 at 12:16 |
Originally posted by Ikki
Turkish power???!!! |
he's not laughing a t the turkish fighing skills
he's laughing well if you say turkish power it's the same as "white power" or "nazi power"
mabey not to you but it sounds like that to a non turk and even to me my brother
|
|
Maljkovic
Earl
Joined: 27-Feb-2006
Location: Croatia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 294
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2006 at 12:54 |
Originally posted by Kapikulu
Originally posted by Maljkovic
Of course we remeber Constantinopole... remeber it was a Hungarian who forged those guns [IMG]smileys/smiley36.gif" align=middle> |
So? |
Three conclusions derive from that:
1.There was no Turkish founder capable of making those guns. If there were, the sultan could of saved up a lot of money
2.The Hungarian craft at forging cannons was apparently very adept at the time, considering the Constantinoploe guns were a major task
3.The Ottomans adopted cannons from Europe
|
|
DayI
Sultan
Joined: 30-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2408
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2006 at 13:59 |
huh? Ottomans adopted cannons from europe?
Why wherent they the same with those of europe?
|
|
|
Bulldog
Caliph
Joined: 17-May-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2800
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2006 at 18:26 |
Now for some reason "Urban" is always mentioned as if he was the only one who designed and built the cannon. Sarucu Usta, Muslihiddin Usta and Urban designed and built the cannon.
The Cannon was introduced to Europe in this large style from here.
Besides, the Cannon did not help in the siege of Constantinople significantly. It did however, start a development in Cannon technology.
|
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.
Albert Pine
|
|
Roberts
Chieftain
aka axeman
Joined: 22-Aug-2005
Location: Riga
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1138
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Oct-2006 at 06:28 |
This is very nice thread.Those who play strategic computer games, probably know of upcomming Medieval 2: Total War. One of the factions represented there - are Turks. Here you can check out their unit roster. I find that roster a bit inaccruate(textures, models, types), so I am going to make Ottomans units (only those for timeframe 1300-1500) as historical accurate as possible (I am cg artist).
Afaik the Ottoman troops can be devided in proffesional Kapikulu corps (Janissaries + Kapikulu cavalry) and troops recruited from Turkish populace (not counting vassals and mercenaries).
So here is my version of Ottoman unit roster (incomplete).
CAVALRY (note that cavalry unit in game might have only two weapons)
Kapikulu cavalry - very well armoured, weapons (mace or sword + lance(?) + shield )
Sipahi cavalry - armoured, mace or sword + bow + shield
Akinci cavalry - lightly armoured, bow + sword + shield
*Should there be spesific cavalry for army commader or he would be in Kapikulu cavalry?
INFANTRY
Nefer Jannisaries - light armour, bow+sword+shield(?)
Zirhli Nefer Jannisaries - armoured, halberd + shield
Jannisary handgunners - light armour, handgun + sword
*Can someone clarify if such divisions ever existed in Jannisary troops, maybe I am missing some?
Ottoman Baltaci - armoured, axe+shield, were mostly used in assaulting fortifications
Ottoman Yaya - light armour, they were recruited from Turkish peasants(?), this type could be devided in in many units -> Yaya spearmen, Yaya archers, Yaya crossbowmens(?) ( I don't know how widespeard and important were crossbows in Ottoman armies)
Azaps - light armour, bow + club or knife.
*Should there be spesific infantry type recruited from Turkish city populace(milita), or they would be recruited in any of units above?
Where you see (?) added, it means that I am uncertain about that.
Please comment, point at the mistakes and post your suggestions.
Edited by axeman - 15-Oct-2006 at 06:57
|
|
Turk Nomad
Shogun
suspended
Joined: 11-Sep-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 228
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Oct-2006 at 07:35 |
Azaps in the front line of battalions used to frighten nearby enemy.They never used armour,or weapon.Only hands...
But the normal Azap battalions used the things you wrote.
|
|
Roberts
Chieftain
aka axeman
Joined: 22-Aug-2005
Location: Riga
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1138
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Oct-2006 at 07:47 |
Originally posted by Turk Nomad
Azaps in the front line of battalions used to frighten nearby enemy.They never used armour,or weapon.Only hands...
But the normal Azap battalions used the things you wrote. |
Well I somehow fail to understand how could front line Azaps frighten enemy. Without having weapons and armour, they would be easily killed either with long range weapons or in melee.
Edited by axeman - 15-Oct-2006 at 07:48
|
|
Degredado
Consul
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Portugal
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 366
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Oct-2006 at 08:06 |
I believe there were cannons in Europe around the twelve hundreds, which was before the Ottomans came into prominence.
Historians say that the Ottomans were successful because:
1. Europe was very fragmented (particularly during the sixteenth century); indeed France ( ooh those traiterous French) actually helped the Ottomans in their quest to destroy all of Western Europe!
2. Professional armies. No way to escape this, but the Ottomans had a real professional army (and they treated their soldiers well; a contemporary made remarks on hjow clean the Turkish camp was). Western Europe did have professional armies: the last of feudal knights and those ever reliable mercenaries .
3. Fervor. But then again, the Ottomans weren't the only ones to have it. Us Portuguese had fervor too. We beat those nasty Rumes with it!
|
Vou votar nas putas. Estou farto de votar nos filhos delas
|
|
Turk Nomad
Shogun
suspended
Joined: 11-Sep-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 228
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Oct-2006 at 11:14 |
Originally posted by axeman
Originally posted by Turk Nomad
Azaps in the front line of battalions used to frighten nearby enemy.They never used armour,or weapon.Only hands...
But the normal Azap battalions used the things you wrote. |
Well I somehow fail to understand how could front line Azaps frighten enemy. Without having weapons and armour, they would be easily killed either with long range weapons or in melee.
|
İf you search you will see it.
Well,good question.Ever heard a proverb "Strong like a Turk"?I must say this is Turkic bravery and power but if ı say you will think ı am a fascist grey wolf right?But ı am not.
This is Turkic power....(ı say again,ı am not a grey wolf =)
|
|
Mordoth
Pretorian
Joined: 21-Sep-2006
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 192
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Oct-2006 at 00:07 |
Hehe,
The word " Strong as a Turk besides the Castle of Aydos " has been a proverb since the Austrian Siege and the resistance which was shown against the grand army of Catholics .
That is a true statement . ( one of Koprulu Pasha was the defender of there , you know they had a hegemony of their own ; LoL )
Koprulu Ahmed Pasha , Koprulu Mustafa Pasha ...etc family affairs ;)
|
If Electricity Comes from Electrons ; does Morality come from Morons :|
|
|
Degredado
Consul
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Portugal
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 366
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Oct-2006 at 14:42 |
Never heard of Aydos. But I have heard of Vienna, and the resistance which was shown against the grand army of the Ottomans
Not to mention Rhodes.
|
Vou votar nas putas. Estou farto de votar nos filhos delas
|
|
Kapikulu
Arch Duke
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Berlin
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1914
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Oct-2006 at 20:06 |
Originally posted by Mordoth
Hehe,
The word " Strong as a Turk besides the Castle of Aydos " |
I think that was Castle of Uyvar.
|
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;
A Strange Orhan Veli
|
|
Kapikulu
Arch Duke
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Berlin
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1914
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Oct-2006 at 20:07 |
Originally posted by Degredado
Never heard of Aydos. But I have heard of Vienna, and the resistance which was shown against the grand army of the Ottomans
Not to mention Rhodes. |
The thing he mentioned is actually true, not a tease material...
If you look for a real resistance against Ottomans, check Crete rather than Rhodes ...Rhodes hadn't resisted too much.
|
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;
A Strange Orhan Veli
|
|
Kapikulu
Arch Duke
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Berlin
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1914
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Oct-2006 at 20:11 |
Originally posted by Degredado
1. Europe was very fragmented (particularly during the sixteenth century); indeed France ( ooh those traiterous French) actually helped the Ottomans in their quest to destroy all of Western Europe!
|
Especially true for Balkans..Too many small kingdoms making things easier for Ottomans..But for Europe, the alliance between Ottomans & French+Protestants was a mutual alliance...They both helped each other...French and Protestans were trying to protect themselves from Charles V and Holy Roman Empire, who was also Ottoman Empire's enemy...So it is a mutual alliance where both sides helped each other.
|
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;
A Strange Orhan Veli
|
|
Maljkovic
Earl
Joined: 27-Feb-2006
Location: Croatia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 294
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Nov-2006 at 10:52 |
Another thing to consider in the Balkans, the conquests of Tzar Dusan were made less then half a generation before Ottoman arrival. This produced the situation of Serbian lords ruling over a Greek populace, adding to their instability.
|
|
xi_tujue
Arch Duke
Atabeg
Joined: 19-May-2006
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1919
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Nov-2006 at 14:58 |
Originally posted by Maljkovic
Another thing to consider in the Balkans, the conquests of Tzar Dusan were made less then half a generation before Ottoman arrival. This produced the situation of Serbian lords ruling over a Greek populace, adding to their instability. |
this isn't that special this happend all the time these ar nothing more than factors that influenced it.
because of this the ottomans might conquered it earlier or had less losses or it cost less but thats it.
it would be like that they wouldn't conquerd it. why could the serbians conquer the byzantines(when did they conquer the greeks) because it was allready falling apart
|
|
Krum
Baron
Joined: 25-Oct-2006
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 412
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Nov-2006 at 17:07 |
Serbians created a large kingdom but,their country was doomed.First all these wars weakened serbia.And most important serbians werent able to create a stable country.After Dusan's death their kingdom just fall apart.
For Bulgaria the most crucial was that the tzardom was fragmented.Three main kingdoms and a few smaller mainly in Macedonia and Thracia.For ottomans it was very east to defeat a few different and small states.
Another important thing is that balkans countries had many conflicts between them even in the dawn of ottoman invasion.That was really stupid.
|
It is only the dead who have seen the end of war.
Plato
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Dec-2006 at 08:24 |
i saw many times talking about janisaries..do everyone know the origins of them?
|
|
Brian J Checco
General
Eli Manning
Joined: 30-Jan-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 925
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Feb-2007 at 12:07 |
Once Europe was able to mobilize itself after the re-energizing period
after the 30 years war, the Turks really started to take a beating. The
siege of Lepanto, the Siege of Vienna, the Greek Revolution (and their
Navy, bought by Lord Byron)... all these things happened in a
relatively short historical period. The Austrians, the Germans and the
Hungarians all found a new energy and vitality, a Christian revolution,
almost, and as ardently as they fought against other Christians, they
turned that aggression against the Turks. After 1800, the Ottomans were
an empire fully in decline. WWI was really just the icing on the cake.
|
|