Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Dampier
Colonel
Joined: 04-Feb-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 749
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Best Special Forces of Modern Armies Posted: 21-May-2006 at 13:25 |
The Red Berets arent special forces (quite).
Criterions would be stuff like; training, equipment, experience, special skills/abilities
|
|
 |
Russian
Pretorian
Joined: 10-May-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 188
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-May-2006 at 21:28 |
Originally posted by Dampier
Red berets? If you are talking about the British Paratroops (who started the whole red beret thing and are also known as the Red Devils) then probably not but it isnt for lack of trying, they are tough, tough men.
SBS isnt as good as SAS but they are still quite excellent. Royal Marine Commandos, while not quite a Special forces unit are similarly excellent. |
I am thinking here, we are arguying about best special forces, and what are the criterions, according to which we are judging?
|
 |
Dampier
Colonel
Joined: 04-Feb-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 749
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-May-2006 at 18:02 |
Red berets? If you are talking about the British Paratroops (who started the whole red beret thing and are also known as the Red Devils) then probably not but it isnt for lack of trying, they are tough, tough men.
SBS isnt as good as SAS but they are still quite excellent. Royal Marine Commandos, while not quite a Special forces unit are similarly excellent.
|
|
 |
Roadkill
Samurai
Joined: 13-May-2006
Location: Norway
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 106
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-May-2006 at 08:41 |
-I'd say SAS on top followed by FSK, then Spetsnaz. FSK is Norway's Special Forces and are top class, but they lack the experience that SAS has. Spetsnaz are crazy people, yes, but that doesn't mean that they are the best. They are reckless and foolhardy. But hey, that's Russia for you.
|
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
-- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
|
 |
Jagatai Khan
Chieftain
Jeune Turc
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1270
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-May-2006 at 17:28 |
What about red berets?I heard they are more specialised and better than the green berets.
|
 |
DukeC
Arch Duke
Joined: 07-Nov-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1564
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-May-2006 at 15:38 |
I like the British SBS. They don't have the high profile of some other special forces but they are some of the most professional soldiers in existance. Like the SEALs not only do they have to master combat on the ground they have to deal with the challenging marine environment.
|
 |
Russian
Pretorian
Joined: 10-May-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 188
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-May-2006 at 00:44 |
Originally posted by Illuminati
the secrecy and covert nature of these units makes it almost impossible
to judge who is the best. All are extremely well outfitted and all have
premiere training. most of thier missions go unreported.
At most, we could dig up a few known missions. But taht isn't enough to
adequately judge who is teh best. More importantly, training doesn't
determine whose best. Combat experience can make a soldier with less
training far better than an unexperienced soldier with no combat
experience.
Spetsnaz are known for having the toughest training. Even British admit
that Spetsnaz soldiers are some of the toughest and most ruthless
soldiers on battlefield. Also, I heard one Spetsnaz instructor saying
how they were training soldiers: first an instroctor twists your arm so
that you scream, then another guy comes and starts to hit you with a
knife handle, then you have to chose between being stabbed with a knife
or have your arm broken. Practicing this in the west simply will not be
allowed.
|
Russia doesn't have a monoploy on intense training. Don't think for a
second that the West doesn't train their soldiers in many of the same
ways.
THe US for example has program (I forget the name) that simulates how a
soldier will be treated if captured. It's just as rough as breaking a
bone, which by the way is BS. The Spetnatz don't break the arms or stab
every recruit. they may be intense, but they can't do that to every
recruit because those kinds of actions can injure a recruit permanently
making him unable to be a SF soldier
Plus, we'd be foolish to assume that Spetsnaz, Delta, SAS, etc...are the most elite units our countries have. There are reports that the US has some units that aren't known about. I'd assume that the UK and Russia has similiar units. but I guess we can only really debate about the units we know exist
|
Well, if he is injured and can not serve anymore, he is not tough enough, no, that's just joke.
Spetdnaz, trust me, is trained in much more brutal way, especially in hand-to-hand combat.
|
 |
Illuminati
General
Joined: 08-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 949
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-May-2006 at 23:55 |
the secrecy and covert nature of these units makes it almost impossible
to judge who is the best. All are extremely well outfitted and all have
premiere training. most of thier missions go unreported.
At most, we could dig up a few known missions. But taht isn't enough to
adequately judge who is teh best. More importantly, training doesn't
determine whose best. Combat experience can make a soldier with less
training far better than an unexperienced soldier with no combat
experience.
Spetsnaz are known for having the toughest training. Even British admit
that Spetsnaz soldiers are some of the toughest and most ruthless
soldiers on battlefield. Also, I heard one Spetsnaz instructor saying
how they were training soldiers: first an instroctor twists your arm so
that you scream, then another guy comes and starts to hit you with a
knife handle, then you have to chose between being stabbed with a knife
or have your arm broken. Practicing this in the west simply will not be
allowed.
|
Russia doesn't have a monoploy on intense training. Don't think for a
second that the West doesn't train their soldiers in many of the same
ways.
THe US for example has program (I forget the name) that simulates how a
soldier will be treated if captured. It's just as rough as breaking a
bone, which by the way is BS. The Spetnatz don't break the arms or stab
every recruit. they may be intense, but they can't do that to every
recruit because those kinds of actions can injure a recruit permanently
making him unable to be a SF soldier
Plus, we'd be foolish to assume that Spetsnaz, Delta, SAS, etc...are the most elite units our countries have. There are reports that the US has some units that aren't known about. I'd assume that the UK and Russia has similiar units. but I guess we can only really debate about the units we know exist
Edited by Illuminati - 19-May-2006 at 00:12
|
 |
Dampier
Colonel
Joined: 04-Feb-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 749
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-May-2006 at 16:48 |
'Tis true..Spetnatz lack loads of equipment but they are very experienced and thier training program is ridiculous to say the least...
|
|
 |
Russian
Pretorian
Joined: 10-May-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 188
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-May-2006 at 16:42 |
Originally posted by raygun
Which special forces is the best in terms of toughness, training and equipment of the modern armies? The Green Berets? The SAS? The Spetnaz? The Israeli Golanis???
|
the toughest and most ruthless are most likely Spetsnaz, they are also the best trained in hand-to-hand combat and knife throwing don't believe me, look up "Systema"
Spetsnaz are known for having the toughest training. Even British admit that Spetsnaz soldiers are some of the toughest and most ruthless soldiers on battlefield. Also, I heard one Spetsnaz instructor saying how they were training soldiers: first an instroctor twists your arm so that you scream, then another guy comes and starts to hit you with a knife handle, then you have to chose between being stabbed with a knife or have your arm broken. Practicing this in the west simply will not be allowed.
Have you guys heard of one of spetsnaz assignments:
In 1985, when terrorists took over the Soviet embassy in Beirut, a Spetsnaz strike team infiltrated the embassy, abducted four of the terrorists and sent one of their decapitated heads in a bag to the terrorists' leader. The following day all the hostages were released.
link: http://www.spetsnaztraining.com/view/spetsnaz
SAS are VERY good too, I saw a video about them, it is one awesome special ops, they have some of the best equipment. British in general take all secret and elite stuf super seriously, their intellenence was one of the most secret in the world.
Edited by Russian
|
 |
raygun
Knight
Joined: 02-Apr-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 80
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-May-2006 at 21:29 |
Which special forces is the best in terms of toughness, training and equipment of the modern armies? The Green Berets? The SAS? The Spetnaz? The Israeli Golanis???
|
 |