Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
tsar
Samurai
Suspended
Joined: 12-May-2006
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 132
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Best Special Forces of Modern Armies Posted: 11-Oct-2006 at 09:36 |
U guys seen the serbian SAJ they are pretty good
|
 |
Desimir
Earl
Suspended
Joined: 13-Sep-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 265
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Sep-2006 at 16:15 |
There is more in Wikipedia
|
 |
Desimir
Earl
Suspended
Joined: 13-Sep-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 265
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Sep-2006 at 16:14 |
http://english.pravda.ru/russia/politics/20-08-2004/6631-alpha-0
|
 |
Leonidas
Tsar
Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Sep-2006 at 05:19 |
desimir ive never heard of them. can you post a link?would like to know more.
|
|
 |
Desimir
Earl
Suspended
Joined: 13-Sep-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 265
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Sep-2006 at 12:13 |
My opinion is that the best special forces in the world are russian and especially VYMPEL and ALPHA.For the statistic i will say that alpha losses are only 7 since their creation and for vympel i dont know,there are no reports.My arguments are many.They are very tough,dont rely on modern advanced systems and technologies and they get used to poor life and lack of resources.Most of their recruits are childrens who are trained during their whole life.The fact that every man from these forces can shoot with AK perfectly(it is very unaccurate weapon)only shows their skills.
|
 |
Dampier
Colonel
Joined: 04-Feb-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 749
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Sep-2006 at 14:01 |
Originally posted by gerghoi zukuf
spetnez and sas.that it. every thing elese sucks.other countries just copied the british and germans |
Umm, Spetnatz is Russian...
Not only that but the German SF has generally been weak. Skorzenys men were good but based around a charismatic figure (like the British Chindits). The Brandenburgers ended up often being wasted as bog standard infantry on the Eastern front. America however has a long history of SF such as Rangers, Merills Marauders, OSS Detatchment 101, Marine Raiders, Amphibious Scouts....
|
|
 |
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Sep-2006 at 19:28 |
spetnez and sas.that it. every thing elese sucks.other countries just copied the british and germans
|
 |
Batu
Baron
Joined: 31-Aug-2006
Location: Barad-dur
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 405
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Sep-2006 at 00:49 |
they hold a competetion every year to find out who is the best already.havent you heard?( i am serious ) 1.vehicle rescue 2.defusing a bomb 3.navigation 4.etc.
last two years Red Berets of Turkish Army won :).they are the best
|
A wizard is never late,nor he is early he arrives exactly when he means to :) ( Gandalf the White in the Third Age of History Empire Of Istari )
|
 |
Cryptic
Arch Duke
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 05-Jul-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1962
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Aug-2006 at 10:34 |
Originally posted by Leonidas
i read that spetnaz are more like crack troop/commando's ratther than the SAS or seals spec opps. |
I think you are right. This is probably because the Russians don't have enough money for part D of the "formula". At one time, Seal Team 6 alone was shooting more pistol ammunition that the entire U.S. Marine Corps. Then add the expense of the daily /nightly helicopter and aircraft usage, travel to training sites etc. etc.
Edited by Cryptic - 25-Aug-2006 at 11:26
|
 |
Leonidas
Tsar
Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Aug-2006 at 08:40 |
i read that spetnaz are more like crack troop/commando's ratther than the SAS or seals spec opps.
|
|
 |
Cryptic
Arch Duke
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 05-Jul-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1962
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Aug-2006 at 15:17 |
It is too hard to tell who is the best. The formula for creating ultra skilled special forces was first created by the Brtish and gave rise to the SAS. Since then, the formula has spread through out the world and many nations have identical forces.
The formula is....
A. Pofessional Officers and Professional NCOS are selectedby their peers for their fitness and intelligence
B. They go through a very well thought out and very demanding training program
C. The Special Forces unit is allowed to independently develop tactics, skills, strategies etc.
D. An incredible amount of money is spent on training, hi tech weapons, and hi tech equipment.
E. Institutional knowledge is passed on to the next generation.
The result is SAS, Spetsnaz, Seals, GSG-9, Saryet etc. etc.
Edited by Cryptic - 24-Aug-2006 at 15:45
|
 |
reis
Immortal Guard
Joined: 24-Aug-2006
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Aug-2006 at 14:12 |
by the way most of SF commandos are good trained but they are trained with artificial tests. they r far from real enemy. they havent any experiance about real war. no education prepare you this moment. but Turkish red berets are trained in real war . you know Turkey has a big terrism problem.South of the Turkey there are much rebel who attacks ppl. so the last part of red berets training is done in real war. what do you know about confidence shooting fire
|
 |
reis
Immortal Guard
Joined: 24-Aug-2006
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Aug-2006 at 14:05 |
what do you know About Turkish red berets. I think nothing. Dont forget they r the best in the world.They won all SF competition with being first expect for two competition.They are trained about Delta force,Ranger ,kontr geurilla..They teach other country's SF . and most of American specialist says Turkish special forces better than us.. by the way ı registered two minutes ago. ı m your new friend :-))
|
 |
Centrix Vigilis
Emperor
Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-Aug-2006 at 00:18 |
This list is really by no means fair in many senses because each has a unique and out standing mission profile and training which is why i'm damn glad we have a 'joint spec ops cmd' that can integrate and cross organise now to include NATO mission requirements except for number 6.... but here ya go.
1. SAS/SBS/Seals..deadheat
2. US Rangers/Fleet Marine Reconn/Royal Marine comandos..deadheat
3. USAF SAR/British SRR
4. French RPIMa and GROUFUMACO
5. special nods to the German KSK...Israeli's and Norwegians.
6.Spetznaz
anybody else patterns their stuff on these guys imo
best
CV
Edited by Centrix Vigilis - 21-Aug-2006 at 00:23
|
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
S. T. Friedman
Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'
|
 |
aghart
Shogun
Joined: 05-Sep-2005
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 232
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Aug-2006 at 05:25 |
Originally posted by Dampier
Red berets? If you are talking about the British Paratroops (who started the whole red beret thing and are also known as the Red Devils) then probably not but it isnt for lack of trying, they are tough, tough men.
SBS isnt as good as SAS but they are still quite excellent. Royal Marine Commandos, while not quite a Special forces unit are similarly excellent. |
Indeed. The British Parachute Regiment are not regarded as "special forces" but the fact that a high proportion of SAS soldiers are ex para's says a lot I think. Royal Marine Commandoes are also not officially "special forces" either but they are "special". Every Royal Marine (except the band) is also a fully trained commando!!.
Other countries have Marines who are simply "Naval" soldiers (very tough and good soldiers but simply soldiers non the less). In other countries you can be a Marine but not a commando, In the UK you can't be a Marine without being a Commando!!!
Having said that, it is a crying shame that due to overstretch in the British Army our specialised Marine Commando units are being deployed and used as infantry in Iraq & Afghanistan.
As for the SBS? they are based in Poole! I live in Poole!! and would not like a visit!!!  so hey you guys, you are the tops 
Edited by aghart - 13-Aug-2006 at 05:27
|
Former Tank Commander (Chieftain)& remember, Change is inevitable!!! except from vending machines
|
 |
Exarchus
General
Joined: 18-Jan-2005
Location: France
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 760
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Aug-2006 at 08:53 |
|
Vae victis!
|
 |
Cezar
Chieftain
Joined: 09-Nov-2005
Location: Romania
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1211
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 09-Aug-2006 at 15:05 |
Well, for some time I've been in the SF/SOF or whatever. I'll just stick to our USLA boys.
USLA=Unitate Speciala pentru Lupta Antiterorista => SATFU=Special Anti-Terrorist Fighting Unit.
*btw I met some Spetz, they were great. But still yhere is no way I could compare them with the SAS or the DElta or the others. Nevertheless cpt. "Rudevsky" spoke highly about the SAS.
|
 |
Sikander
Pretorian
Joined: 12-Aug-2004
Location: Portugal
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 198
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 09-Aug-2006 at 12:46 |
IMO Special forces can be divided into SF and SOF. SF are things like paratroopers, rangers ans marines while SOF are things like Seals, Spetznaz, SAS, etc.
Don't forget the Italian "Bats". Their role is to infiltrate into the enemy's rear and then communicate to base in order to give Italian forces good targets to their missiles/planes. They must be so stealthy that the job is well done only when they're not detected and don't use their weapons, not even once.
Don't forget also the Portuguese Comandos (equivalent to US Rangers) and Fuzileiros (Marines), plus the Fuzileiros' Destacamento de Aces Especiais (DAE), the best unit in the Portuguese armed forces, equivalent to SEAL and SAS/SBS. They participated in numerous semi-reported actions in Africa plus seizing drug ships "a la" Royal Marine Commandos.
|
 |
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-Jul-2006 at 05:58 |
But I like best, Turkish Red Berrets
|
 |
Ponce de Leon
Caliph
Lonce De Peon
Joined: 11-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2967
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Jul-2006 at 13:37 |
Thanks!
|
 |