Attila the Hun-is he Asian or Indo-European?

I am a girl. By the way, what language is this ???

ahhhh don't get mad my pretty. Atilla was pre turkic lets say it like that its the best i think like the huns broke up in different branches maygars turks and others. I nver said that hungarians werent descendents of huns if i'm not wrong zorigo said that turks weren't descendents of huns. the word oufio or oufi is to define the oghuz turks who came to the region of the greeks the maygars were also called oufio and if i'm not wrong so were the huns

Turks and Hungarians share alot of names, Zoltan, Emre, Attila, etc but this is irrelavent. My point is that noone knows for sure where Huns are from, forget the langauge since they left NO APHABET at ALL! All I am saying is that I dont think he was Turkic or Hungarian but yes we both have the right to claim him. Agree?

 

why would atilla make hungary his home for the soul purpose it layed in the centre of his empire( + It looks beautiful over there)

 

atilla hun who is a descendent of the xiongnu asiatic huns known as the northern tribes later on the turks were know as the northern tribes so why didn't the chinese noted the difference in people inhabitting the region mabey the people didn't chance only the name

 

In all fairness, this is just an ideaology. Hungarians, Magyars, people who reside in Hungary always think of Attila as legend. We think of him as ancestor to us. This of course doesnt matter whether he really was or wasnt , all that matters is what it means to us. And this goes for Turks, Chinese, whoever else wants to think of him this way. All that is left of it is a legend. So to have some arguments over it is pretty stupid since both Ural and Altai people can feel some closeness to it. But for one particular peoples to claim all is just rediulous, especially without any real proof. this is more or less a connection between Hungarians and Turks, Finns etc.