Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Topic: English domination of Ireland Posted: 17-Jul-2007 at 10:19 |
You talk some amount of rubbish Denis
|
|
Parnell
Suspended
Suspended
Joined: 04-Apr-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1409
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Jul-2007 at 10:34 |
At least I'm not some clown who runs in, insults someone elses intelligence without ever making one valid point in his entire life... And then has the audacity to claim that someone other than him talks sh*te! Don't make me laugh!
Edited by Parnell - 17-Jul-2007 at 10:49
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Jul-2007 at 11:12 |
Don't curse at me, I aint cursing at you
|
|
Dolphin
Arch Duke
Suspended
Joined: 06-Feb-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1551
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Jul-2007 at 12:00 |
Back to topic please..
What do the english members think about the 1916 rising as an attempt to over turn british rule?
|
|
Patch
Samurai
Joined: 19-Apr-2006
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 119
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Jul-2007 at 14:51 |
Originally posted by Dolphin
Back to topic please..
What do the english members think about the 1916 rising as an attempt to over turn british rule? |
r
An unnecssary waste of lives.
Ireland would have been granted Home Rule under the Home Rule Act after the war and then it would simply been a matter of time before full independance was attained without any need for bloodshed.
|
|
edgewaters
Sultan
Snake in the Grass-Banned
Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Jul-2007 at 03:16 |
Originally posted by Parnell
The Irish 'invasion' was no different than the English acquisition of Anjou, or Aquitaine. They are the result of marriage alliances. Henry then had to invade Ireland in 1171 to make sure he didn't have a rival Norman Kingdom growing on his doorstep, and it was the Irish Lords who practically gave Ireland to him in 1171 when they handed it to him on a plate, largely because they preferred him to some dodgy High King. I'm hardly arguing for the sake of arguing either - your trying to make this out to be some horrible invasion by those damn English for no reason other than to take our liberty. It didn't happen like that. |
That entire episode has precious little to do with later conflict between the English and the Irish. The Norman lords got Gaelicized, and Henry's "conquest" was eventually contained to just a single city and a small territory around it.
What's really behind the conflict are much later events; particularly things like religious conflict coinciding with the Tudor Reconquest, the English Civil War as it played out in Ireland and Cromwell's campaigns, and above all, the Plantations. Nothing before that has much relevance - the Norman conquest certainly is not much of a complaint amongst Irish nationalists.
|
|
edgewaters
Sultan
Snake in the Grass-Banned
Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Jul-2007 at 03:26 |
Originally posted by Patch
An unnecssary waste of lives.
Ireland would have been granted Home Rule under the Home Rule Act after the war and then it would simply been a matter of time before full independance was attained without any need for bloodshed. |
Uhm ... slight problem with this theory ... the IRA was engaged in their campaign chiefly from 1919 to 1921 ... the war was well over and done with, and they had not been granted Home Rule despite hundreds of thousands serving and dying for Britain.
|
|
elenos
Chieftain
Joined: 13-Jun-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Jul-2007 at 03:58 |
The Easter
rising did what it set out to do, polarize public sentiment in favour of
Republican resentment against the English. I say English rather than British
for geographically Ireland is part of the British Isles, a name given by the Romans who
never invaded Ireland. Not for all the gold in Ireland is something of a joke, for there
never was gold found in Ireland. Roman intelligence reports on an
obvious lack of precious metals persuaded them to stay away.
|
elenos
|
|
Parnell
Suspended
Suspended
Joined: 04-Apr-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1409
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Jul-2007 at 04:29 |
Uhm ... slight problem with this theory ... the IRA was engaged in their campaign chiefly from 1919 to 1921 ... the war was well over and done with, and they had not been granted Home Rule despite hundreds of thousands serving and dying for Britain.
|
Thats probably more to do with the Home Rulers defeat at the election...
|
|
Dolphin
Arch Duke
Suspended
Joined: 06-Feb-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1551
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Jul-2007 at 04:30 |
Originally posted by elenos
The Easter rising did what it set out to do, polarize public sentiment in favour of Republican resentment against the English. I say English rather than British for geographically Ireland is part of the British Isles, a name given by the Romans who never invaded Ireland. Not for all the gold in Ireland is something of a joke, for there never was gold found in Ireland. Roman intelligence reports on an obvious lack of precious metals persuaded them to stay away. |
Oii, there's been gold found on Croke Patrick, one of Ireland's highest holy mountains....And we had plenty of tin way back when, before it was mined into nothing. But, yes there was and still is a lack of precious metal in Ireland, except of course the Irish themselves..
|
|
edgewaters
Sultan
Snake in the Grass-Banned
Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Jul-2007 at 04:53 |
Originally posted by Parnell
Thats probably more to do with the Home Rulers defeat at the election... |
The Home Rulers were quite popular for some time - but Gladstone's home rule bills kept getting defeated in British Parliament. This caused their collapse eventually, as there was no point in being repeatedly rejected.
Sinn Fein won the 1918 election, and declared Ireland independant. Britain could have just accepted the new state of affairs, but instead they decided to send the military in to do a regime change. Thus the (essentially defensive) guerrilla war of 1919-1921.
|
|
elenos
Chieftain
Joined: 13-Jun-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Jul-2007 at 05:31 |
To be sure Dolphin, the Irish are precious and you are a
jewel of the Tatha De Danaan,
|
elenos
|
|
Dolphin
Arch Duke
Suspended
Joined: 06-Feb-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1551
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Jul-2007 at 05:52 |
Originally posted by elenos
To be sure Dolphin, the Irish are precious and you are a jewel of the Tatha De Danaan,
|
Ohh, the irony oozes from your very words..! Ach go raibh mle maith agat, elenos, comhritm go forleathan!
|
|
Patch
Samurai
Joined: 19-Apr-2006
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 119
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jul-2007 at 03:21 |
Edgewaters wrote:-
'Uhm ... slight problem with this theory ... the IRA was engaged in their campaign chiefly from 1919 to 1921 ... the war was well over and done with, and they had not been granted Home Rule despite hundreds of thousands serving and dying for Britain. '
The question was about the 1916 rising. And there was I thinking WW1 ended on 11th November 1918.....
Edited by Patch - 19-Jul-2007 at 03:23
|
|
Lotus
Samurai
Joined: 17-Aug-2006
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 116
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jul-2007 at 05:14 |
So when was English introduced into Ireland ?
I guess the first invasion was more Norman than English, and at that time the Normans first language was still French.
So are we talking about a much later time period, such as the Tudor period when the Irish were encouraged to use English ?
But, yes there was and still is a lack of precious metal in Ireland, except of course the Irish themselves..
There is some pretty precious stuff produced at the Midleton distillery near Cork.
Hats off to the Irish for inventing Whiskey
lovely stuff.
|
|
Dolphin
Arch Duke
Suspended
Joined: 06-Feb-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1551
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jul-2007 at 06:47 |
Dang and all these years those Scottish propoganda ba****ds have made me think they invented whisky, while we were all too drunk on it realise they were lying..! Deadly, another drunken gloat for me. (As, when drunk, you have as an Irishman, personally experienced the Famine, the troubles, built America, and now invented Whisky)
|
|
elenos
Chieftain
Joined: 13-Jun-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jul-2007 at 06:54 |
From Wikipedia (and I agree this is a good article)
Different grains are used for different varieties,
including: barley, malted barley, rye, malted rye, wheat, and maize (corn).
Whisky derives from the Irish Gaelic uisce beatha, which itself derives from
the Latin aqua vitae, meaning "water of life". It is always Scotch whisky,
and Irish whiskey; other countries may use either spelling.
The first written record of whisky comes from 1405 in Ireland,
where it was distilled by monks. It is also mentioned in Scotland
in 1496. However it is thought that whisky had already been around for at least
several hundred years prior. When or where whisky was first distilled is
unknown and the local, undocumented beverage production during the period makes
identification of the drink's origin difficult. Additionally, it is possible
that different groups discovered processes of distillation independently of one
another.
|
elenos
|
|
gcle2003
King
Suspended
Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jul-2007 at 07:41 |
Any country that brews beer/ale could produce whisk(e)y by accident. Like wine and brandy.
|
|
Patch
Samurai
Joined: 19-Apr-2006
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 119
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jul-2007 at 07:43 |
Originally posted by Dolphin
Dang and all these years those Scottish propoganda ba****ds have made me think they invented whisky, while we were all too drunk on it realise they were lying..! Deadly, another drunken gloat for me. (As, when drunk, you have as an Irishman, personally experienced the Famine, the troubles, built America, and now invented Whisky) |
The Scots did invent whisky, the Irish invented whiskey something comletely different...
|
|
Dolphin
Arch Duke
Suspended
Joined: 06-Feb-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1551
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jul-2007 at 07:45 |
Originally posted by Patch
Originally posted by Dolphin
Dang and all these years those Scottish propoganda ba****ds have made me think they invented whisky, while we were all too drunk on it realise they were lying..! Deadly, another drunken gloat for me. (As, when drunk, you have as an Irishman, personally experienced the Famine, the troubles, built America, and now invented Whisky) |
The Scots did invent whisky, the Irish invented whiskey something comletely different... |
Na the scots invented whiskEY, the irish invented Whisky
|
|