QuoteReplyTopic: Government and Power in the First Bulgarian Empire Posted: 25-Dec-2006 at 07:41
Originally posted by DayI
Originally posted by NikeBG
Originally posted by Anton
If some suppose they were of tribes close to Slavs, I am sure you heard about those theories...
Well, honestly, I don't remember hearing such theories so far. I remember about theories that Slavs actually don't exist and are a manipulation, created by Russia, but that the Bulgars were Slavs - none so far. Do you know any author or site, which claims such a thing? Eventually a link?
Btw, Kavkan (welcome to the forum), IIRC, цар is derived from цьсар, not from kaiser. The very sound of the German Kaiser is quite far both from цар and from цьсар. I am not sure, however, is it derived from the Latin Caesar or from the Greek kesar, as (IMHO) it's equally close by sound to both. Another interesting example is the more modern Slavic "title" "kral", which means exactly "king", used mainly for Western kings. IIRC, it's derived from the Slavic form of the name of Charlemagne - "Karl". However, I'm not entirely sure about that since the first example, which I remember, of "kral" being used is around the middle/end of the 14th c. - Krali Marko/Marko Kraljevic, which is quite far from Charlemagne's times.
"Kral" is also king in Turkish, its also "kyraly" in Hungarian.
Hi!
correct: kirly (ly=j) But you are right. In the Secret history of the mongols the danube hungarians (some of their still nomadic tribes lived near by the Volga-bulgarians) were called "kerals".
We have here in Hungary some settlemens called Tarkany (tarkan-it means smith, or iron).
Tehproto bulgarians were a part of the West turk empire in some tme; the title of the turk empirors was (after the suan-suan empirors) kagan. So the bulgars could take over the title. The avarian ruler was a kagan too (and some bulgarian tribes (f.e. the kutrigurs) lived by the avars in the 6. Cent., and much more bulgarian groups moved to the avars in the 670's.
The main reason that bulgarian state survived is protobulgars.You know that most of today's slavic countries were not created by slavs but by others(vikings and russia).So slavs were not able to create a country alone.
Simple people don't make a country.It is we who united them under the bulgar banner(btw it was a spear with a horse tail at the end if anyone wants to know)
They were able to create states of their own in other places. Croatia had its own kingdom. Bosnia had its own kingdom. Serbia had its own kingdom. Montenegro as well. Poland did too. The Bohemian duchy, virtually independent. A lot rather sucessful examples of slavic states, origininated by slavs. Just because Russia and Bulgaria's majority slavic population needed some outside father figure to do so for them does not reflect the entire slavic world.
They were able to create states of their own in other places. Croatia had its own kingdom. Bosnia had its own kingdom. Serbia had its own kingdom. Montenegro as well. Poland did too. The Bohemian duchy, virtually independent. A lot rather sucessful examples of slavic states, origininated by slavs. Just because Russia and Bulgaria's majority slavic population needed some outside father figure to do so for them does not reflect the entire slavic world.
I don't believe that Bulgarian and Russian Slavs were not able to create a state. That is just a part of Bulgarian and Russian myths.
But I would like to mention that Serbian (Raska), Polish, Croatian and Bosnian Kingdoms were created some 150 years later and and it is unsure whether they would be created without influence of Bulgarian state (I am talking at least about Balkan slavonic states) and it's relationships with Byzantine Empire, Franks and some others.
They were able to create states of their own in other places. Croatia had its own kingdom. Bosnia had its own kingdom. Serbia had its own kingdom. Montenegro as well. Poland did too. The Bohemian duchy, virtually independent. A lot rather sucessful examples of slavic states, origininated by slavs. Just because Russia and Bulgaria's majority slavic population needed some outside father figure to do so for them does not reflect the entire slavic world.
I don't believe that Bulgarian and Russian Slavs were not able to create a state. That is just a part of Bulgarian and Russian myths.
But I would like to mention that Serbian (Raska), Polish, Croatian and Bosnian Kingdoms were created some 150 years later and and it is unsure whether they would be created without influence of Bulgarian state (I am talking at least about Balkan slavonic states) and it's relationships with Byzantine Empire, Franks and some others.
Hard to say if they were using Bulgaria as an example or not. However, like you said too, they would have been able to create states, just like the turkic Bulgars were able to.
Everybody search for long hand from Moscow Names are: Gantcho Tsenoff, Asen Chillingirov and George Sotiroff.
I believe I have one book of Gantcho Tsenov, I might check it out. When I received it first and saw all the funny things there I just thought "Not a serious book. I'll read it for entertainment only if I have nothing else." But I guess even funny books deserve a critical reading. And, yes, conspiracy theories seem to be quite attractive in the last few years all accross the globe. Either the Russians invented the whole Slavic world or the Americans destroyed the WTC at 9/11 themselves (or, of course, the Jews stand behind all of this). At least that gives us something more to laugh about...
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum