Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
think
Baron
Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 435
|
Quote Reply
Topic: northern and southern Europe Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 11:24 |
Pinguin. This dude here is from brazil, his names Wanderlai Silva.. Im pretty sure he has some native in him, so would he be classified as White or Mestizo ?
Edited by think - 22-Oct-2006 at 11:27
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 12:19 |
Also the world is already overpopulated |
Europes not.. |
Just wait until natural resources run out. In the premodern age excessive population growth was corrected every few decades or so by a substinence crisis (famine, desease, war). The last time this happened in Europe was in the 1840s. Since then technological advances have made continued population growth possible. However when we'll run out of natural resources, that will end. So if we don't bring now the number of people now by getting less children, it will happen later, and in a much nastier way.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 12:39 |
Originally posted by think
Pinguin.
This dude here is from brazil, his names Wanderlai Silva..
Im pretty sure he has some native in him, so would he be classified as White or Mestizo ?
|
I don't know. We would need a genetic test. I believe the person is either 100% white or perhaps has certain Black ancestry on him. But nobody can be certain in genetics. I don't see Native facial features on him, besides, boxing change facial features with easy
Pinguin
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 12:43 |
Originally posted by Mixcoatl
Also the world is already overpopulated |
Europes not.. |
Just wait until natural resources run out.
In the premodern age excessive population growth was corrected every few decades or so by a substinence crisis (famine, desease, war). The last time this happened in Europe was in the 1840s. Since then technological advances have made continued population growth possible. However when we'll run out of natural resources, that will end. So if we don't bring now the number of people now by getting less children, it will happen later, and in a much nastier way.
|
Well, I will make a politically incorrect statement here. If you want to stop population growth you have to convince those people that are reproducing out of control right now. I mean basically Arabs, South West Asians and particularly Subsaharan Africans.
Europeans can't even mantain its current populations estable, so they don't have an explossion problem. Rather, they are hardly surviving right now.
Pinguin.
|
|
Joinville
Consul
Joined: 29-Sep-2006
Location: Sweden
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 353
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 16:05 |
Originally posted by pinguin
Originally posted by Mixcoatl
Also the world is already overpopulated | Europes not.. | Just wait until natural resources run out.In the premodern age excessive population growth was corrected every few decades or so by a substinence crisis (famine, desease, war). The last time this happened in Europe was in the 1840s. Since then technological advances have made continued population growth possible. However when we'll run out of natural resources, that will end. So if we don't bring now the number of people now by getting less children, it will happen later, and in a much nastier way. |
Well, I will make a politically incorrect statement here. If you want to stop population growth you have to convince those people that are reproducing out of control right now. I mean basically Arabs, South West Asians and particularly Subsaharan Africans.
Europeans can't even mantain its current populations estable, so they don't have an explossion problem. Rather, they are hardly surviving right now.
Pinguin.
|
Oh they're surviving fine. And their societies are still doing well. The fact that there's going to be a demand for people to come and make a living in then is hardly a bad thing for anyone.
It's a wealth thing. Once these non-europeans start catching up the west in wealth their birth-rates will drop, and when western absolute wealth starts to decline them birth rates will pick up again.
|
One must not insult the future.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 18:05 |
Well, I will make a politically incorrect
statement here. If you want to stop population growth you have to
convince those people that are reproducing out of control right now. I
mean basically Arabs, South West Asians and particularly Subsaharan
Africans.
So people who get only a few children should get more and people who
get many children should get only a few? Isn't that a bit inconsequent?
Besides, population growth rates in Latin America are still pretty high as well.
Rather, they are hardly surviving right now.
I fully second joinvilles reaction here.
Edited by Mixcoatl - 22-Oct-2006 at 18:10
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 18:37 |
Originally posted by Mixcoatl
Besides, population growth rates in Latin America are still pretty high as well.
|
No, they are not. What you are seeing is people not dying as yet. I mean, old people is living longer. In many places of Latin America the same problems of Europe are comming up for the next generations.
Sorry. For population explosion you'll have to complain to other continents.
Pinguin.
|
|
Adalwolf
Chieftain
Joined: 08-Sep-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1230
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 18:42 |
To all: what is the optimal population level for Earth? 1 billion? 4 billion? What do you think?
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 19:29 |
Originally posted by pinguin
Originally posted by Mixcoatl
Besides, population growth rates in Latin America are still pretty high as well.
|
No, they are not.
|
Yes they are:
Argentine 0.96%
Belize 2.31%
Bolivia 1.45%
Brazil 1.04%
Chile 0.94%
Colombia 1.46%
Costa Rica 1.45%
Cuba 0.31%
Dominican Republic 1.47%
Ecuador 1.5%
El Salvador 1.72%
French Guiana 1.96%
Guatemala 2.27%
Haiti 2.3%
Honduras 2.16%
Mexico 1.16%
Nicaragua 1.89%
Panama 1.6%
Paraguay 2.45%
Peru 1.32%
Puerto Rico 0.4%
Uruguay 0.46%
Venezuela 1.38%
Not as high as Subsaharan Africa, but still pretty impressive, most are
well above the growth rates of wealthier countries. Also notice that
relatively wealthy countries (Argentina, Uruguay, Chile) have lower
growth rates than poorer countries (Honduras, Peru, Haiti). Don't
forget that if a country's population grows with 2%, there needs to be
an economical growth of 2% as well in order to maintain standards of
living.
What you are seeing is people not dying as yet. |
Perhaps not dying. But no doubt living circumstances would be a lot
better with less people. And if the population will continue to grow
like that sooner or later the Maltusian trap will close.
Edited by Mixcoatl - 22-Oct-2006 at 19:30
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 19:59 |
Is an audi worth a child?
I have already chosen. I preffer my kids to luxury. After all, our descendents remain on the planet, and the material things can't be put on the coffin.
Pinguin
|
|
konstantinius
General
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 762
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 20:08 |
Originally posted by pinguin
Is an audi worth a child?
I have already chosen. I preffer my kids to luxury. After all, our descendents remain on the planet, and the material things can't be put on the coffin.
Pinguin |
You don't have to send your Audi to school; on the other hand car mechanics can be pretty expensive these days
|
" I do disagree with what you say but I'll defend to my death your right to do so."
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 20:20 |
Yes. You save a lot of money by not having kids.
That's the reward nature gaves you for giving up.
Pinguin
|
|
think
Baron
Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 435
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 20:22 |
Oh they're surviving fine. And their societies are still doing
well. The fact that there's going to be a demand for people to come and
make a living in then is hardly a bad thing for anyone |
You couldnt have said it more simply (its not a simple matter), but i dont agree with you..
|
|
gcle2003
King
Suspended
Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Oct-2006 at 04:33 |
Originally posted by pinguin
Originally posted by gcle2003
....
The way society is organised now in Spain and the developed world, you no longer need so much to breed children to support you in middle and old age.
|
Yes. The peopl who support you in middle and old age are immigrants now, not your own children.
|
|
Is there something wrong with that? The immigrants generally get a good deal out of it too.
And of course they are mostly running away from places that have been kept economically backward by concentration on 'family values'.
Well, I know that since long time ago, because I lived in a developed country, that most Europe and North America is quite happy to become extinct.
In Latin America people still fight to have children no matter is getting quite expensive.
|
Why on earth do you consider that a good thing? One would hope that humanity had evolved past the pure animal stage.
We still preffer our own kind rather than import foreigners to pay our welfare checks when we get old.
|
Very chauvinistic of you. Incidentally is there a long queue of foreigners trying to migrate to Chile?
However, the influence of the decadent mentality of the west in our people is a matter of concern by now.
Things happenes because a reason. Perhaps its time other people, who love life more, take the control of the situation.
Pinguin
|
The reason people in economically backward countries have more children (apart from the religious issues) is that the economic benefits of children's labour outweigh the costs of bringing them up.
It has nothing to do with 'love of life' except in the sense that your life will be better if you have more children working.
Edited by gcle2003 - 23-Oct-2006 at 04:35
|
|
Joinville
Consul
Joined: 29-Sep-2006
Location: Sweden
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 353
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Oct-2006 at 05:12 |
Originally posted by pinguin
Is an audi worth a child? |
Of course not. But doesn't your kid deserve an Audi, if you want the best for him?
It's more like "One Audi for each kid". And then these kids go around in Audis while yours have to ride the buss.
It's about investing heavily (education mostly, which is way more expensive than cars) in the few children you get, not getting a lot of children hoping one of them will be able to afford giving you an Audi in your old age.
|
One must not insult the future.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Oct-2006 at 08:52 |
Originally posted by Joinville
Originally posted by pinguin
Is an audi worth a child? | Of course not. But doesn't your kid deserve an Audi, if you want the best for him?
It's more like "One Audi for each kid". And then these kids go around in Audis while yours have to ride the buss.
It's about investing heavily (education mostly, which is way more expensive than cars) in the few children you get, not getting a lot of children hoping one of them will be able to afford giving you an Audi in your old age. |
You should give that advice to Subsaharan Africans. Not to me. All my kids are getting college education.
Pinguin
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Oct-2006 at 09:04 |
Originally posted by gcle2003
Is there something wrong with that? The immigrants generally get a good deal out of it too.
And of course they are mostly running away from places that have been kept economically backward by concentration on 'family values'.
|
Yes. It is easier to BUY people abroad that having kids. That's for sure.
And the "family values" I was thinking were the ones your grandparents and even your parents have, but that your generation forgot.
Originally posted by gcle2003
Why on earth do you consider that a good thing? One would hope that humanity had evolved past the pure animal stage.
|
Well, the animal that does not reproduce get extinguished. Do you believe the immigrants will keep your culture alive? Forget it. If you people don't preserve live you will be forgoten like the Neaderthal man is forgotten today. That's the "animal stage". The weak perish and the strong survive.
The law of the jungle is still here, between the skycrappers.
Originally posted by gcle2003
Very chauvinistic of you. Incidentally is there a long queue of foreigners trying to migrate to Chile?
|
Quite a lot. Many Peruvian nanies and even some DR prostitutes. However, most of immigrant we have add value to the country, like Koreans enterpreneurs, Argentinean professionals and some Americans and Europeans that are feed up with the developing countries style of live.
We still select who comes in. And we don't pay welfare checks to refugees.
Originally posted by gcle2003
The reason people in economically backward countries have more children (apart from the religious issues) is that the economic benefits of children's labour outweigh the costs of bringing them up.
It has nothing to do with 'love of life' except in the sense that your life will be better if you have more children working. |
Yes. The economical benefits. I guess the states should not pay the welfare checks of so many old European and North American senior citizens that live on the shoulders of immigrants and the few of theirs fellow citizens, because they decided it was more fun to avoids kids when they could?
What is more shameful, that the family colaborates with the elders, or that strangers support you at the end?
In any case, most people in Latin America don't live on theirs kids anyways, so that claim, so many times repeated, of the old people having kids because of the economic benefits, it is a fallacy.
Pinguin
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Oct-2006 at 13:24 |
Originally posted by pinguin
I was thinking were the ones your grandparents and even your parents have, but that your generation forgot. |
Just check gcle's profile.
|
|
Joinville
Consul
Joined: 29-Sep-2006
Location: Sweden
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 353
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Oct-2006 at 13:35 |
Originally posted by pinguin
Originally posted by Joinville
Originally posted by pinguin
Is an audi worth a child? | Of course not. But doesn't your kid deserve an Audi, if you want the best for him?
It's more like "One Audi for each kid". And then these kids go around in Audis while yours have to ride the buss.
It's about investing heavily (education mostly, which is way more expensive than cars) in the few children you get, not getting a lot of children hoping one of them will be able to afford giving you an Audi in your old age. |
You should give that advice to Subsaharan Africans. Not to me. All my kids are getting college education.
Pinguin |
I didn't think macroeconomic musings counted as personal advice?
|
One must not insult the future.
|
|
Timotheus
Baron
Joined: 15-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 478
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Oct-2006 at 00:20 |
Dear me! Are people still ranting about the population bomb? What did Paul Ehrlich predict would happen in the year 2000?
|
|