Print Page | Close Window

10 Criticisms of Israel

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: Scholarly Pursuits
Forum Name: Current Affairs
Forum Discription: Debates on topical, current World politics
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2931
Printed Date: 29-Apr-2024 at 02:24
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: 10 Criticisms of Israel
Posted By: Winterhaze13
Subject: 10 Criticisms of Israel
Date Posted: 12-Apr-2005 at 12:15
I will list 10 common criticisms of the Israeli state and its policies. My intent behind this thread is to get at the major concerns about the middle east conflicts and hope to arrive at a grey area of compromise. Note: the criticisms will be taken from New York Times Bestseller The Case For Israel by Alan Dershowitz, which I am currently reading.

On whether I recommend this book, it is blatant Pro-Israeli propanganda and completely one-sided. So, I suggest pro-Israelis read it and pro-Palestinians avoid it. If you are on the fence read The Case for Israel but read a Pro-Palestinian book afterwards. So, here are the criticisms:

1. Israel is a Colonial, Imperialist state.

2. European Jews displaced Palestinians.

3. The Zionist movement was a plot to colonize all of Palestine.

4. The Balfour Declaration was not international law.

5. The Israelis are unwilling to share Palestine.

6. The Jews have exploited the memory of the Holocaust to garner sympathy for Israel.

7. The U.N. 1947 partition of Palestine was unfair to the Palestinians.

8. Israel created the Palestinian refugee crisis.

9. The Israeli occupation is unjustified.

10. Israel is ONE of the prime human rights violators in the world.


Note: I will act as a third party in this thread by only attempting to provoke discussion. Also, let's keep this discussion civilized please.

Source: Alan Dershowitz. The Case for Israel. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons inc., 2003)


-------------
Indeed, history is nothing more than a tableau of crimes and misfortunes.

-- Voltaire
French author, humanist, rationalist, & satirist (1694 - 1778)



Replies:
Posted By: Illuminati
Date Posted: 13-Apr-2005 at 01:40
Israel is not a colonial, Imperialist state.

The land that Israel occupies is holy land for three of the worlds biggest religions. The land itself has been fought over for centuries. The land has been in the hands of the Arabs and the Jews many times throughout history. BOTH groups have a right to that land.

Now, people will argue that Palestinians had the land when it was taken from them. Well, that is true but the British technically controlled that area. Now, the British were not native to that land, but the Jews are.

You cna make a good argument about Israel being a human rights abuser, but the Palestinians far surpass the Israelis in terms of human rights abuse.  One side attacks military targets (though mistakes do happen)......the other side purposely targets innocent women and children. There are militant israelis who fight terror with terror, but in terms of sheer human rights abuse, the Palestinians are much worse than the Israelis.

Simply saying that the deal made in 1947 and the use of the holocaust by the Jews to garner sympathy is the problem just isn't correct at all.

The hostility between the jews and Arabs and the fight for the land that the Israelis occupy goes back centuries. It has more to do with religion than anything else. And neither sides's religion is more correct than the others. Neither side has more of a right to that land than the other side does.

and if Israelis are unwilling to share Palestinian land as you say...........then why has Israel started to hand over contorl of many cities to the Palestinians???




-------------


Posted By: Beylerbeyi
Date Posted: 13-Apr-2005 at 04:55

You cna make a good argument about Israel being a human rights abuser, but the Palestinians far surpass the Israelis in terms of human rights abuse.  One side attacks military targets (though mistakes do happen)......the other side purposely targets innocent women and children. There are militant israelis who fight terror with terror, but in terms of sheer human rights abuse, the Palestinians are much worse than the Israelis.

This is stinking bullsh*t. Israel killed way more Palestinians than Palestinians killed Israelis. And most of the Palestinians killed are civillians and children. Read from the BBC:

3,135 killed by security forces in the West Bank and Gaza including 627 aged under 18, 181 killed in extrajudicial executions and 288 (including at least 29 aged under 18) killed in the course of these assassinations.

656 children, more than %20 of the dead. Military targets oh yeah. And this is the number of Israelis killed by the Palestinians:

431 civilians killed in Israel
including 78 aged under 18

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3694350.stm - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3694350.stm

BBC took the data from an Israeli source.

Besides killing, Israel destroys the homes of innocent Palestinians, detains them at will, sets up roadblocks, etc. etc. Israel is an apartheid state. In defiance of UN resolutions, it treats the Palestinians as sub-humans. It needs to be excluded from the international community like South Africa used to be.



-------------


Posted By: ramin
Date Posted: 13-Apr-2005 at 05:11
Originally posted by Illuminati

..then why has Israel started to hand over contorl of many cities to the Palestinians???
to shut the public's mouth.


-------------
"I won't laugh if a philosophy halves the moon"


Posted By: Perseas
Date Posted: 13-Apr-2005 at 05:37

Something that people tend to forget is that there were also Israeli terrorists - Irgun - killing Arabs way before the creation of Israel with the intent of taking land by frightening Arabs off. In fact, Jews and Muslims lived peacefully with each other for thousands of years before the arrival of the European Jews in the 20th century.

The big problem is that each side holds that their opinions are "facts". As such there is no discussion of who is right and who is wrong, facts are facts. This enables each side to deny the other side even the right to disagree with such "facts".

Denial of the other side is polarization, there is no middle ground and will never be until each side recognizes that the other's point of view is as valid as their own. In a polarized situation such recognition is connected with betrayal.

So, in order for there to be even a tiny step towards the resolution of the problem, each side must betray its own position.
Though it is a betrayal of a position that for many defines their existence, it is the first step to becoming a human being. People who hold so strongly to their views that they can deny the humanity of others have abandoned their own humanity.



Posted By: Illuminati
Date Posted: 13-Apr-2005 at 11:05
as far as israelis also killing more palestinians......Palestinians
use children as suicide bombers. They use children to smuggle
weapons.

Israel is controlled by a legitimate government, Palestine is
controlled by Hamas. Which is on the UN list of terrorist groups.

Now, as I said earlier israel has is militant terrorist groups also.
netiher side is completely innocent of terrorism, but one side
clearly

And which side started 3 wars against the other side?? The
Arabs tried to invad Israel 3 seperate times. Israel is just a
much stronger nation whose military is is better than the Arab
Armies. example being the Six Day War.

As far as the BBc link. It means nothing. So what if israel killed
more people. Israel is the one who is attacking the terrorists
before they terrorists attack them. Of course teh are going to kill
more. That doesn't mean the palestinians are more just in this
case.

Plus, israel has a much better ability to take out terrorists than
the palestinians do to kill israelis. And don't forget that the
Palestinians hide in and around women and children. their
bomb shops are always found in apartment buildings.

If palestinians don't want so many civilian casualties then they
should stop hiding behind women and children

-------------


Posted By: ramin
Date Posted: 13-Apr-2005 at 11:55
Remember WWII? France? Nazi army and French partisans? the only difference is that Palestinians are Muslims, and they're willing to kill themselves along with the enemy( it's called Jihad in Islam). But you're right, that's crazy and Hamas is a terrorist organization, but let's not forget, Israel is the invader.

-------------
"I won't laugh if a philosophy halves the moon"


Posted By: JanusRook
Date Posted: 13-Apr-2005 at 14:06

Remember WWII? France? Nazi army and French partisans?

Ironic analogy.

Now, people will argue that Palestinians had the land when it was taken from them. Well, that is true but the British technically controlled that area. Now, the British were not native to that land, but the Jews are.

The jews are no more native to the levant than the hungarians are to russia. Both migrated more than a thousand years ago. Yet the jewish claim is the strongest? If anything they should have been given Khazaria, the latest jewish state before Israel.



-------------
Economic Communist, Political Progressive, Social Conservative.

Unless otherwise noted source is wiki.


Posted By: Illuminati
Date Posted: 13-Apr-2005 at 17:15

Originally posted by ramin

Remember WWII? France? Nazi army and French partisans? the only difference is that Palestinians are Muslims, and they're willing to kill themselves along with the enemy( it's called Jihad in Islam). But you're right, that's crazy and Hamas is a terrorist organization, but let's not forget, Israel is the invader.

once again you are ignoring history. Israel is not the invader. No one is necessarily the invader. It is just as much their land as it is the Palestinians. that land has been in the hands of many different groups all throughout history.

Jews have been in that region for centuries.



-------------


Posted By: ramin
Date Posted: 14-Apr-2005 at 15:20
Originally posted by Illuminati

once again you are ignoring history. Israel is not the invader. No one is necessarily the invader. It is just as much their land as it is the Palestinians. that land has been in the hands of many different groups all throughout history.

Jews have been in that region for centuries.



Americans sound much more logical when they don't talk about native people!  (hypotheticaly)


Ok Let's go back to the discussion:
first you should clear out what do u mean by "that land has been in the hands of many different groups"? Do you mean Italy, Iran, Turkey, Egypt have a right on Palestine as well?

but whatever, OK... Israel & Palestinians are the native people and they've lived there in peace together for many years -- AGREED. But what right do Jews have to throw their neighbors out of the land, destroying their homeland and their style of living? (Considering Jews' migration from that region long long time ago)



-------------
"I won't laugh if a philosophy halves the moon"


Posted By: Genghis
Date Posted: 14-Apr-2005 at 22:26

Unlike a lot of Americans I do not like israel at all.  They have just as much blood on their hands as the Arabs do and the very creation of their state was a massive act of theft from the Palestineans.

It is because of Israel that America is hated throughout the Middle East, without Israel America would probably have relations with Arab nations on par with that of European nations and others.  It's also illogical, the Israelis have 6 million people and no oil, the Moslems have a billion people and the majority of the world's oil.  However the Jewish vote and coffers keep politicians supporting Israel.  When I become President I'll end all that and hopefully be the first American President who's popular in the Mideast.



-------------
Member of IAEA


Posted By: strategos
Date Posted: 14-Apr-2005 at 22:37
Once the oil barrels run dry, it won't matter..

-------------
http://theforgotten.org/intro.html


Posted By: Illuminati
Date Posted: 14-Apr-2005 at 23:16
Originally posted by ramin

Originally posted by Illuminati

once again you are ignoring history. Israel is not the invader. No one is necessarily the invader. It is just as much their land as it is the Palestinians. that land has been in the hands of many different groups all throughout history.

Jews have been in that region for centuries.



Americans sound much more logical when they don't talk about native people!  (hypotheticaly)


Ok Let's go back to the discussion:
first you should clear out what do u mean by "that land has been in the hands of many different groups"? Do you mean Italy, Iran, Turkey, Egypt have a right on Palestine as well?

but whatever, OK... Israel & Palestinians are the native people and they've lived there in peace together for many years -- AGREED. But what right do Jews have to throw their neighbors out of the land, destroying their homeland and their style of living? (Considering Jews' migration from that region long long time ago)



I wasn't referring to the Europeans, I was referring to the Natives.....Israelis and the Palestinians.

Jews never totally left that region either. You want to blame someone for the creation of Isreal...blame the UK and the UN. They are the ones that created the state for the Jews. Don't blame the Jewish for flocking to a nation that was set up for them by the UN.

Both sides perpetuate the problem. There are unjust murders on both sides. But, I do see one side standing in the way of peace more than the other. Which side ruined the Camp David Peace Accords??? The Palestinians did, because Arafat was a greedy terrorist who would give no concessions. His corruption has become even more apparent now that he is dead.

The main difference between the groups is that Israel has relative control over its civilian population and has a working government who can abide by a cease-fire.  The Palestinian Authority does not have enough control. groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad do nothing but stand in the way of peace. I see Abbas as a good person who truly wants peace. He needs to be the one in control. Not the terrorist groups.




-------------


Posted By: eaglecap
Date Posted: 15-Apr-2005 at 00:00
There was never a Palestinian state in history but something has to be done about their condition. They are Jordanians and Syrians but this land has been in the hand of many people. Before the Islamic invasion it belonged to the Romans and Byzantines for centuries. The name was given to the land by the Romans after they sent the Jews into exile, Palestine=Phillistines.
Question:
Why are their rich Arab brethern doing so little to help the Palestinians?


Posted By: Gubook Janggoon
Date Posted: 15-Apr-2005 at 00:03
Originally posted by Genghis

Unlike a lot of Americans I do not like israel at all.  They have just as much blood on their hands as the Arabs do and the very creation of their state was a massive act of theft from the Palestineans.

It is because of Israel that America is hated throughout the Middle East, without Israel America would probably have relations with Arab nations on par with that of European nations and others.  It's also illogical, the Israelis have 6 million people and no oil, the Moslems have a billion people and the majority of the world's oil.  However the Jewish vote and coffers keep politicians supporting Israel.  When I become President I'll end all that and hopefully be the first American President who's popular in the Mideast.



I agree.

I just hope you'll be a good prez.


-------------


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 15-Apr-2005 at 06:33
Why are their rich Arab brethern doing so little to help the Palestinians?

They're not wanting to harm their interest with good relations of the United States I think.
But does it matter? The fact that Arab countries don't help the Palestinians doesn't say that no-one should help the Palestinians?



-------------


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 15-Apr-2005 at 08:06
Originally posted by Illuminati

once again you are ignoring history. Israel is not the invader. No one is necessarily the invader. It is just as much their land as it is the Palestinians. that land has been in the hands of many different groups all throughout history.

Jews have been in that region for centuries.

First of all, Jarusalem, the center of three big religions, has its name from an ancient pagan Arabic God, "Salem", and the city originally belongs to Arabs, But noone can deny the Jewish existance there for more than two thousand and 500 years.

Jews lived there together with Arabs since ancient times, but this doesnt mean Israel have the right to own there, because Jews lived all aover the world and they lost their homelands. And Jews havent ruled Palestine since ancient times. Today, Arabic settlements are very old and they own Palestine. If there happened a Jewish genocide in Europe, this doesnt mean that you have the right to violate other nations' rights, even to protect another nation's rights. So the action of collecting Jews all over the Europe and placing them into another country's (which has nothing to do with all these genocides or actions) borderlands is an ignorant and violating ideology since the beginning.

I wonder what would happen if a nation comitted a genocide to Turks all over Europe and after this the UN agreed on colecting all survivors and placing them to their homelands (imagine that there is no country such Turkey). So would they be able to divide all mid-southern Russia , northwestern China, Eastern Kazakhstan and Kyrgizistan and form a new independent Turkish state there? I dont think so. So what was the sin of Palestinians? Living in their homelands?

And all these violations arent all about invading another country's lands. Human rights violations and innocent people's massacres are the biggest problem. The Israel forces didnt only invade those lands, but comitted huge civilian massacres, that cannot be identified as "mistakes". While the Palestinians are trying to protect their houses and family's by throwing stones and attacking with their Ak-47s, the Israel forces are attacking those civilians with their tanks and massive warmachines. Is this a paranoia or hatred? Well, lets figure it out...

Anyway, those lands need peace and I wish it happens soon. We are all fed up seeing soldiers killing children or terrorists attacking civilians everyday on TV...



-------------


Posted By: Kuu-ukko
Date Posted: 15-Apr-2005 at 08:36

Israel is thought legitimate only because it is funded by the US government.

Originally posted by Illuminati

Which is on the UN list of terrorist groups.
Don't confuse US with UN.

Originally posted by Illuminati

As far as the BBc link. It means nothing.
?? You question and deny BBC? Oh well, resembles a six year old child shutting his ears and saying "I'm not listening!"....
 



Posted By: SearchAndDestroy
Date Posted: 15-Apr-2005 at 09:14
Originally posted by Genghis

Unlike a lot of Americans I do not like israel at all.  They have just as much blood on their hands as the Arabs do and the very creation of their state was a massive act of theft from the Palestineans.

It is because of Israel that America is hated throughout the Middle East, without Israel America would probably have relations with Arab nations on par with that of European nations and others.  It's also illogical, the Israelis have 6 million people and no oil, the Moslems have a billion people and the majority of the world's oil.  However the Jewish vote and coffers keep politicians supporting Israel.  When I become President I'll end all that and hopefully be the first American President who's popular in the Mideast.

haha, Well you have my vote, as long as your not Republican.

Yeah I don't agree with being to friendly with Israel. I think we should just cut ties with them. Our gov't says they want to keep America safe, yet we defend Israel which is basiclly harming us involuntarily by causing alot of hatred towards us, and criticism. I think America should do things in the best interest of itself without stepping on to many toes.



Posted By: ramin
Date Posted: 15-Apr-2005 at 10:57
Originally posted by Kuu-ukko

Israel is thought legitimate only because it is funded by the US government.

Originally posted by Illuminati

Which is on the UN list of terrorist groups.
Don't confuse US with UN.

Originally posted by Illuminati

As far as the BBc link. It means nothing.
?? You question and deny BBC? Oh well, resembles a six year old child shutting his ears and saying "I'm not listening!"....
 

LOLLLLLLLLLLL


-------------
"I won't laugh if a philosophy halves the moon"


Posted By: Winterhaze13
Date Posted: 15-Apr-2005 at 16:34

Dershowitz is very cynical, his book is completely one-sided and he ignores evidence that supports the Palestinian's cause. Many of his arguments are very thin and he lists about every single crime against the Israeli people but almost none on Palestinians.

He often presents his argument really early in the chapter and then rambles on for pages on crimes against the Jews that often don't have any relevance to his arguments. Am I suppose to believe that the Palestinians have a monopoly on violence in the region. In addition he tries to discredit Noam Chomsky, the most well-known and respected political thinker in the world.

Some of his arguments are so weak. I expect more from a prominant lawyer. In the section on Israeli's human rights record, he tries to justify it by saying that: Well, umm, Arab countries do it too. If I wrote that on a Political Science essay I would get a D. That does not justify Human rights violations nor does it give them a blank check.

Worst yet, he tries to pin the holocaust on the Palestinians by claiming that they had a moral obligation to accept Jews running away from Europe. The truth is that the entire western world is quilty of this. That's why the west recognized Israel because they didn't want Jewish people to come to their country. Canada and the United States turned away ships of Jews that were trying to escape and sent them back to Europe to die in camps. If we really want to prosecute everyone who is partly responsible for the holocaust then we can even blame German Jews who voted for the Nazis. But don't pin it on the Palestinians who are far less responsible than most people.



-------------
Indeed, history is nothing more than a tableau of crimes and misfortunes.

-- Voltaire
French author, humanist, rationalist, & satirist (1694 - 1778)


Posted By: Genghis
Date Posted: 15-Apr-2005 at 16:38
Originally posted by SearchAndDestroy

Originally posted by Genghis

Unlike a lot of Americans I do not like israel at all.  They have just as much blood on their hands as the Arabs do and the very creation of their state was a massive act of theft from the Palestineans.

It is because of Israel that America is hated throughout the Middle East, without Israel America would probably have relations with Arab nations on par with that of European nations and others.  It's also illogical, the Israelis have 6 million people and no oil, the Moslems have a billion people and the majority of the world's oil.  However the Jewish vote and coffers keep politicians supporting Israel.  When I become President I'll end all that and hopefully be the first American President who's popular in the Mideast.

haha, Well you have my vote, as long as your not Republican.

Yeah I don't agree with being to friendly with Israel. I think we should just cut ties with them. Our gov't says they want to keep America safe, yet we defend Israel which is basiclly harming us involuntarily by causing alot of hatred towards us, and criticism. I think America should do things in the best interest of itself without stepping on to many toes.

Actually I am Republican but don't like Israel, which is an odd combination.



-------------
Member of IAEA


Posted By: SearchAndDestroy
Date Posted: 15-Apr-2005 at 22:47

Although the democrats aren't the best I could never go for the party thats considered the poster boy for the bible. The Republicans are now also know as the bible party, and conservatives want to push their traditions and beliefs on the rest of the country and thats exactly what we are fighting now in the mid east.

I just wish a there can be a 3rd party that supports the original values of America, but still keeping control on the major aspects needed. We learned from the depression that the gov't needed to get into business and other things. But for the gov't to tell us whats morally wrong and to pry into our personal lives is wrong and un- American.



Posted By: Winterhaze13
Date Posted: 16-Apr-2005 at 13:28
Some more views on the Middle East situation:



Israeli People's Most Common Mistakes By Gilad Atzmon



The most common mistakes made by Israelis are as follows:

1. To fail to realize that there is no essential difference between Tel Aviv
and a Jewish settlement in the West Bank.

2. To believe that the creation of the state of Israel was an outcome of the
Holocaust.

3. To regard themselves as innocent people and thus as victims of the
Israeli­Palestinian conflict.

4. To believe that they live in a democracy and therefore that their
atrocities are legitimate.

5. To be convinced that they live in an open society which enjoys political
and ideological diversity.

6. To believe that the ghetto is behind them.

7. To be convinced that the 'Jewish state' is a legitimate concept.

8. To think that Israel is a shelter for the entire Jewish people and the
best answer to anti-Semitism.

9. To regard themselves as humanists.

10. To be sure that Israel is immortal.

For more information see: http://www.gilad.co.uk/mistakes.html - http://www.gilad.co.uk/mistakes.html


-------------
Indeed, history is nothing more than a tableau of crimes and misfortunes.

-- Voltaire
French author, humanist, rationalist, & satirist (1694 - 1778)


Posted By: Genghis
Date Posted: 16-Apr-2005 at 23:12
Originally posted by SearchAndDestroy

Although the democrats aren't the best I could never go for the party thats considered the poster boy for the bible. The Republicans are now also know as the bible party, and conservatives want to push their traditions and beliefs on the rest of the country and thats exactly what we are fighting now in the mid east.

I just wish a there can be a 3rd party that supports the original values of America, but still keeping control on the major aspects needed. We learned from the depression that the gov't needed to get into business and other things. But for the gov't to tell us whats morally wrong and to pry into our personal lives is wrong and un- American.

I'm a more secular conservative when it comes to social issues.  I've never been one who thinks that religion should interfere with any political decisions.  I really believe in conservatism because I believe that the good of the state is more important than excessive individual freedom and that rationality and social darwinism are better philosophies than the sentimentality and weak-mongering of liberals. 



-------------
Member of IAEA



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com