Print Page | Close Window

Where do you get your News from?

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: Scholarly Pursuits
Forum Name: Current Affairs
Forum Discription: Debates on topical, current World politics
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28445
Printed Date: 23-Apr-2024 at 04:40
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Where do you get your News from?
Posted By: Maximus Germanicus
Subject: Where do you get your News from?
Date Posted: 01-Jun-2010 at 03:38

Just wondering

 

Myself

 

Broadcast:

BBC America (I don't like most of the US cable news, because there is too much fluff)

 

Local news

 

CNBC/MSNBC Chris Matthews show and Joe Scarborough (only two I watch because of the in-depth political coverage even though CM is way mor liberal than me, at least he has common sense the rest of the channel is way too left)

 

Online:

Int Herald Trib (NY Times)

Der Spiegel

BBC online

 

Print:

Wall Street Journal

Finc Times

The Economist

 

Politics:

Politico

Wash Post

 

Sport:

ESPN News (I am an addict)

BBC and the Daily Mail for Rugby Union and Soccer

 

For Fun News talk show

Real time




Replies:
Posted By: DreamWeaver
Date Posted: 01-Jun-2010 at 06:19
The BBC and the Independt

-------------


Posted By: DreamWeaver
Date Posted: 01-Jun-2010 at 06:19
Al Jazira also every now and again

-------------


Posted By: TheGreatSimba
Date Posted: 01-Jun-2010 at 07:28

Broadcast:

AlJazeera

PBS Newshour

 

Online:

BBC online

Mediamatters

Huffington Post

Washington Post

New York Times

Several other websites

 

Radio:

NPR


For Fun News talk show

The Daily Show
The Colbert Report


-------------
I use CAPS for emphasis, not yelling. Just don't want to have to click the bold button every time.


Posted By: opuslola
Date Posted: 02-Jun-2010 at 14:42
Fox News baby!

I sometimes watch MSNBC, CNN, and ABC, CBS, and NBC to see how the "Hate America" and Israel crowd is doing?

And, it seems if we look at the stats, that they are doing poorly!

Yes, I sometimes read my local newspaper, as well as the Times Pycayune, and sometimes even the NY Times,but not often!

I just hate to read hate speech!

Regards,

-------------
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/


Posted By: TheGreatSimba
Date Posted: 02-Jun-2010 at 15:45
Why do you get your news from a channel that admits it only has 6 hours of news programming (biased news programming at that)?LOL No wonder you're out of the loop on most if not all political issues, try diversifying a bit.

-------------
I use CAPS for emphasis, not yelling. Just don't want to have to click the bold button every time.


Posted By: opuslola
Date Posted: 02-Jun-2010 at 18:01
Dear TGS! Please do not get your panties in a wad? I thought I mentioned that I do let my eyes wonder about the "other side" on occasion!

Watch those panties, young lady!

Sorry, as far as I know you could well be a woman!

Regards, anyway!

-------------
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/


Posted By: TheGreatSimba
Date Posted: 02-Jun-2010 at 18:20
Originally posted by opuslola

Dear TGS! Please do not get your panties in a wad? I thought I mentioned that I do let my eyes wonder about the "other side" on occasion!

Watch those panties, young lady!

Sorry, as far as I know you could well be a woman!

Regards, anyway!


MSNBC, CNN, and ABC, CBS, and NBC are not the "other side".

-------------
I use CAPS for emphasis, not yelling. Just don't want to have to click the bold button every time.


Posted By: opuslola
Date Posted: 02-Jun-2010 at 18:44
There goes your panties again! laugh!

Of course they are! One side is "right" as in correct, and the other side is "left" as in "gauche!" From Wikipedia; "In French, gauche generally means "left" or "awkward""

Ok, the rest of the news media are "awkward!", but that is as nice as I can write it!

Regards,

-------------
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/


Posted By: TheGreatSimba
Date Posted: 02-Jun-2010 at 18:49
Originally posted by opuslola

There goes your panties again! laugh!

Of course they are! One side is "right" as in correct, and the other side is "left" as in "gauche!" From Wikipedia; "In French, gauche generally means "left" or "awkward""

Ok, the rest of the news media are "awkward!", but that is as nice as I can write it!

Regards,


MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC are not "left". American Media consists of extreme right, Fox "News", and Moderate, which is MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC.

Left media doesnt exist in the United States, except on the internet.



-------------
I use CAPS for emphasis, not yelling. Just don't want to have to click the bold button every time.


Posted By: Cryptic
Date Posted: 03-Jun-2010 at 14:50
Originally posted by TheGreatSimba

 
Left media doesnt exist in the United States, except on the internet.
 
Public Television is leftist. Under duress, they even let go one of their news anchors after he confused personal editorials with "news" and refused to give air time to conservative rebutals.
 
Even their new motto "fair and unbiased reporting" is a joke.


Posted By: TheGreatSimba
Date Posted: 03-Jun-2010 at 15:36
Public Television,  NON-PROFIT, is a lot of the times neutral and very reliable precisely because its NON-PROFIT. Those who think its biased tend to be the same ones who watch Fox News and therefore have a skewed idea of the left-right political spectrum.

Most media in in the US ranges from moderate to the extreme right (i.e Fox News).

However, even public television (the News Hour on PBS for example) has a pro-Right bias:


FAIR study

In October 2006, the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressivism_in_the_United_States - progressive http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_criticism - media criticism group http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_and_Accuracy_in_Reporting - Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) accused The NewsHour of lacking balance, diversity, and viewpoints of the general public, in favor of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_%28United_States%29 - Republican Party and corporate viewpoints. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBS_NewsHour#cite_note-FAIR2967-8 - [9] FAIR studied the NewsHour's guest list for 6 months, from October 2005 to March 2006. Republicans outnumbered Democrats 2:1 (66% to 33%), and people of color made up only 15% of U.S.-based sources. Former http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Attorney_General - U.S. Attorney General http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales - Alberto Gonzales accounted for 30% of Latino sources, while former http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Secretary_of_State - U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice accounted for 13% of African-American sources. Additionally, Hurricane Katrina victims made up 46% of all African-American sources. Public interest groups made up 4% of sources. Current and former government and military officials made up 50% of sources. Regarding the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War - Iraq War , sources that supported an extended occupation outnumbered pro-withdrawal sources 5:1, and this ratio continued even after polls favored a withdrawal from Iraq. During this time, not a single peace activist appeared. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBS_NewsHour#cite_note-FAIR2967-8 - [9] PBS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman - Ombudsman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Getler - Michael Getler agreed with FAIR's report. These are "perilous times," wrote Getler in his Ombudsman column. "As a viewer and journalist, I find the program occasionally frustrating; sometimes too polite, too balanced when issues are not really balanced, and too many political and emotion-laden statements pass without factual challenges from the interviewer." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBS_NewsHour#cite_note-9 - [10] FAIR also protested in 1995 when Liberty Media purchased a majority of the program, citing Liberty's majority owner, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Malone - John Malone , for his "Machiavellian business tactics" and right-wing sentiments. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBS_NewsHour#cite_note-10 - [11]

The closest Liberal "news" shows on TV would probably be the Daily Show and the Colbert Report.



-------------
I use CAPS for emphasis, not yelling. Just don't want to have to click the bold button every time.


Posted By: warwolf1969
Date Posted: 17-Jul-2010 at 09:55
Generally I get my News from the BBC.  I also read the Times.  Internet news is usually the BBC as well.  For sport I watch which ever channel is broadcasting the sport I'm interested in.


Posted By: opuslola
Date Posted: 17-Jul-2010 at 13:27
A small red FOX, usually tells me what to think and what to say!

"OPEN THE POD BAY, HAL!

Sorry Dave!" Sorry I meant TGS!

-------------
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/


Posted By: Patryk
Date Posted: 22-Jul-2010 at 18:13
I don't watch the news.  I create it!  I live the world as it happens! 
 
But I do need intel briefings so:
 
http://www.debka.com - www.debka.com
I use Drudge to keep aware of the news hour by hour ( http://www.drudgerport.com - www.drudgerport.com )
I like real clear politics for analysis ( http://www.realcrealpolitics.com - www.realcrealpolitics.com )
I will monitor places like Deutsche Welle just to make sure I am not too biased toward English-language sources and also to practice my greatly under-utilized German. 
 
From the news stands, I will pick up The Economist, the South China Morning Post, or even splurge and get Foreign Affairs Quarterly.
 


Posted By: TheGreatSimba
Date Posted: 22-Jul-2010 at 20:39
I find this the best combination of World News:

BBC News International (Western viewpoint, plus they are pretty neutral), and Aljazeera English (Eastern viewpoint, also pretty neutral). Also occasionally Russia Today (to see what another world power has to say about things). Does anyone know of a Chinese English language channel?

I've also been checking out these websites to get my facts straight regarding the US:

www.politifact.com
www.factcheck.org

Very useful, especially when there is so much propaganda and misinformation being spread here in the US.



-------------
I use CAPS for emphasis, not yelling. Just don't want to have to click the bold button every time.


Posted By: red clay
Date Posted: 23-Jul-2010 at 05:49
In philly, you get the media version, then you go here-
 
 
To get it all sorted out and properly "splained".
 
 
 


-------------
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.


Posted By: Patryk
Date Posted: 23-Jul-2010 at 17:32
Originally posted by TheGreatSimba

 ... there is so much propaganda and misinformation being spread here in the US.
 
And much of it comes from Robert Gibbs' mouth ...


Posted By: opuslola
Date Posted: 23-Jul-2010 at 17:39
Originally posted by Patryk

Originally posted by TheGreatSimba

 ... there is so much propaganda and misinformation being spread here in the US.

 

And much of it comes from Robert Gibbs' mouth ...


Maybe Bob, is really a "Glibb?"

-------------
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/


Posted By: opuslola
Date Posted: 23-Jul-2010 at 18:03
From Fox and Glenn Beck;

Will Rangle, wrangle his way out of this, or will MSNBC fire its correspondent?

See;

http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/43389/

-------------
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/


Posted By: TheGreatSimba
Date Posted: 23-Jul-2010 at 18:09
Sure it does. Once again, I will refer you to two non-partisan websites which have been very useful to me:

www.politifact.com
www.factcheck.org

They are two websites founded for and dedicated to filtering out the lies and determining the truth. You can even submit questions to them and they will answer.

Politifact is quite interesting is because they have a "truthometer" and they'll tell you when a politician is lying or telling the truth. Check them out, cant hurt.


-------------
I use CAPS for emphasis, not yelling. Just don't want to have to click the bold button every time.


Posted By: opuslola
Date Posted: 23-Jul-2010 at 18:15
Are you saying that Charlie baby actually paid all of his taxes, on time?

Are you saying that he is innocent as a lamb?

-------------
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/


Posted By: Patryk
Date Posted: 23-Jul-2010 at 21:16

http://www.politifact.com - www.politifact.com looked pretty biased.  Come on!  They actually gave Joe Biden a "1/2 true."  Joe Biden doesn't even believe Joe Biden!



Posted By: Patryk
Date Posted: 23-Jul-2010 at 21:28
If you get your news form MSNBC, you will be misinformed.  If you get your news from Fox, you will be misinformed.  If you get your news from Aljazeera, you too will be misinformed.  The point is; there is no TRUTH out there.  Other than Einstein's and Kepler's Laws of Motion and other points made by the hard sciences; IT IS ALL SPIN.  I could see it in politifact.com and I see it in Glenn Beck (who I see only on youtube since I work in Asia).
 
It boils down to which group already supports your existing Weltanschauung.   Maybe it's Maddow maybe it Beck.  Either way, if you are looking for "facts" study mathematics or chemistry. 


Posted By: DreamWeaver
Date Posted: 24-Jul-2010 at 07:50
Originally posted by Patryk

The point is; there is no TRUTH out there.  Other than Einstein's and Kepler's Laws of Motion and other points made by the hard sciences;



Are they? Your pushing it with that, but that would be for a different discussion.


-------------


Posted By: TheGreatSimba
Date Posted: 24-Jul-2010 at 08:40
Originally posted by Patryk

http://www.politifact.com - www.politifact.com looked pretty biased.  Come on!  They actually gave Joe Biden a "1/2 true."  Joe Biden doesn't even believe Joe Biden!



I think you're confused. What that side does is take statements that people make, evaluate them to see how true they are. If you read their explanation (there is a link under the meter), it would explain why they gave him a 1/2 true for that political statement.

Here is where they explained why they gave him a 1/2 truth for that statement regarding nation building in Afghanistan:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/jul/20/joe-biden/joe-biden-says-us-not-engaged-nation-building-afgh/

So let's recap. When Biden says that "we're not engaged in nation-building" in Afghanistan, he's correct that the administration doesn't use that word, and that the U.S. commitment is narrower and more time-limited than a nation-building effort might be. However, many of the things the U.S. is seeking to do in Afghanistan would fall under a reasonable definition of what used to be known as nation-building. So while we acknowledge the limits of U.S. military intentions in Afghanistan, we don't think it's right to let the vice president simply deny the existence of the types of activities formerly identified with "nation building" by disavowing the phrase. So we rate his statement Half True.


A 1/2 means that not everything he says is precisely correct but is not completely wrong either. I believe a half truth is a very reasonable rating for that statement based on their assessment.

politifact and factcheck are not biased at all, they merely report the truth, that is why they were created, to cut out all the crap thats spewed out by cable news networks. I suggest you check both of them out, you'll learn a lot, I know I have.


-------------
I use CAPS for emphasis, not yelling. Just don't want to have to click the bold button every time.


Posted By: Patryk
Date Posted: 24-Jul-2010 at 21:49
I know how politifact ranked the Biden comment.  That's why I was so incredulous.  Giving him 1/2 credit just because the WH doesn't use the term "nation-building" is like giving Biden partial credit because he used a complete sentence or because Afghanistan does indeed exist.  On the key point of "nation-building" whatever you want to call it, Biden obfuscated.  He gets a "0" from me.  That's not to say I don't like the guy.  I liked him for years ... going back to his Apartheid Divestment days (1986).  I think he is the most honest person in this administration. 


Posted By: TheGreatSimba
Date Posted: 25-Jul-2010 at 10:07
so do you or do you not think we are nation building in Afghanistan? I'm confused regarding your stance.

I have to agree with politifact here, we are doing some things consistent with nation building, on the other hand, we are not committed to staying there for a long period of time and not investing as much effort into building up the nation.

So in my opinion, I think a half is very justified. I think you're just biased here, their assessment is pretty fair. Like I said, its a non-partisan website dedicated to being fair and reporting the facts.


-------------
I use CAPS for emphasis, not yelling. Just don't want to have to click the bold button every time.


Posted By: Patryk
Date Posted: 27-Jul-2010 at 18:45
We are doing Nation-Building in Afghanistan whether we call it that or call it "lovely flower cultivation."  We are doing Nation-Building. 
 
One of my buddies from the Army picked up the nick-name from the local Iraqis or "Abu Falooz" (father of the money) because he was part of a Civil Affairs team that wandered around Iraq handing out money to anybody who wanted to build a bridge or upgrade a town's electical grid.  Much of the money disappeared and no work was ever done.  He said his group started the threaten Iraqis if they didn't do the promised for which they had been given thousands of US dollars ("I need to see a bridge her in 30 days or some of my friends will come at night" -- he used to tell them). Anyway, the Americans were more pro-active.  He said the Italians and Poles in his sector just gave the money and hurried back to base because their were under strict orders from home not to get killed. 
 
YES, Bush started that.  We have flushed billions down those Arabian and Aryan toilets.  Trying to make those people in the smiliing, turbaned versions of Danes or Australians isn't going to happen.  The best case scenario in almost any country is a dictator who just so happens to be friendly towards us.  They are not going to do pluralistic democracies.   


Posted By: TheGreatSimba
Date Posted: 27-Jul-2010 at 19:04
You did say you were a Tea Partier right?

-------------
I use CAPS for emphasis, not yelling. Just don't want to have to click the bold button every time.


Posted By: opuslola
Date Posted: 27-Jul-2010 at 19:10
I especially like Orange-Pekoe!

Yummy!

-------------
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/


Posted By: SilverTungsten
Date Posted: 21-Sep-2010 at 16:09
I get news from mostly TV and the internet. I don't really follow one specific news site, I just browse a few and read what interests me.


Posted By: eaglecap
Date Posted: 21-Sep-2010 at 16:45
Radio:
Savage Nation, Rusty Humphrey, Laura Ingram, NPR and coast to coast am

Internet:
Jihadwatch, Gates of Vienna, Savage Nation, and Walid Shoebat

TV:
None

-------------
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε


Posted By: TheGreatSimba
Date Posted: 22-Sep-2010 at 14:09
isnt "Gates of Vienna" your own blog?

-------------
I use CAPS for emphasis, not yelling. Just don't want to have to click the bold button every time.


Posted By: Patryk
Date Posted: 23-Sep-2010 at 04:37
I have read Gates of Vienna.  I think I read it a few times.  It's good.  I also like Jihadwatch.  Robert Spencer knows his stuff!


Posted By: opuslola
Date Posted: 08-Oct-2010 at 20:52
Well some of my news comes from this site;

http://mail.aol.com/32783-111/aol-1/en-us/Suite.aspx

Perhaps all of you should read it?

Regards,

-------------
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com