Print Page | Close Window

Cyclone anomaly

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: General History
Forum Name: Natural History
Forum Discription: History viewed through ecology, geology, paleoclimatology, paleontology & zoology to assist in understanding earth's history
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=22936
Printed Date: 08-Jun-2024 at 23:56
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Cyclone anomaly
Posted By: Knights
Subject: Cyclone anomaly
Date Posted: 22-Dec-2007 at 08:10
Something that has always puzzled me is what would happen if a tropical cyclone were to cross the equator. In the Southern Hemisphere, cyclones spin clockwise, while in the North they spin anti-clockwise. So, I wondered whether a cyclone would just 'change direction' upon crossing the equator. Well, I finally found out the answer to my question.

Source: http://www.ccmr.cornell.edu/education/ask/index.html?quid=514 - http://www.ccmr.cornell.edu/education/ask/index.html?quid=514

What would happen if a tornado started in the southern hemisphere and progressed into the northern hemisphere? Would it change directions?

A tornado is a local, short-term phenomenon that forms a funnel of air typically about a hundred meters across. It forms on land, quite far away from the equator, and never travels long enough (or far enough) to cross the equator.

That, however, is not the end of the story (not by a long shot!). While tornadoes are too short-lived to go anywhere, there are several larger versions of similar storms (i.e., storms with a spiraling wind flow) like tropical cyclones (names like “hurricane” and “typhoon” are just local names of tropical cyclones), which do live long enough and travel far enough (often several thousand miles over the sea). The interesting question is; do they cross the equator?

Let’s start at the beginning, with the birth of a cyclone. Sometimes during the summer, the air near the earth’s surface heats up. Hot air is lighter than normal air (that’s how hot air balloons go up), so it rises. But this creates a “partial void”, a low-pressure region, which attracts air from neighboring regions, which rush in to fill the “void”. At this point, a second interesting effect kicks in.

The rotation of the earth, besides forming night and day, creates several other funny effects, one of which is the so-called Coriolis force. Briefly told, this force moves all horizontally moving bodies to their right in the northern hemisphere, and to their left in the southern hemisphere.

Back to cyclones. If the low pressure “void” talked about were in the northern hemisphere, air would rush in from all directions to the low-pressure region. At the same time the rushing air would be continuously deflected to its right. Because air is moving in towards a point and also to the right, it’s not hard to imagine that pretty soon it would be coming in in a counterclockwise spiral. So the incoming air creates a counterclockwise spiral, which, if it spirals fast enough, creates a storm called a cyclone. Similarly, such a cyclone formed in the southern hemisphere would spin clockwise.

So what does this tell us about the times a cyclone ventures across the equator?

Firstly, to create a cyclone, the winds have to spiral fast enough. The Coriolis force is weakest at the equator, and grows toward the poles. Near the equator, it’s just not strong enough to create a cyclone, and so there’s a region between (roughly) 5 degrees N and 5 degrees S where no cyclones ever form.

Secondly, can a cyclone formed outside that narrow belt cross over? As remarked before, the Coriolis force is stronger away from the equator. So winds away from the equator are spiraling faster than winds near the equator. This creates a low-pressure region to the north (south) of cyclones in the northern (southern) hemisphere (the so-called Bernoulli’s principle), which pulls the cyclones away from the equator. So not only is the Coriolis force responsible for creating cyclones, it also keeps them away from the equator!

Thirdly, what if a cyclone, against all odds, did cross the equator? If ever a clockwise cyclone crossed over to the northern hemisphere, the Coriolis force there would try to forcibly rotate it in the other direction. It is not surprising therefore, that the Coriolis force would apply the brakes on such a cyclone, which would slow down and ultimately peter out.

So do cyclones ever cross the equator? It turns out that while some cyclones in the Indian Ocean come very close to pulling it off, the odds are ultimately too overwhelming, and they die out near the equator.

Cyclones of the Atlantic and the Pacific, on the other hand, don’t even come close. To summarize, it would be a safe bet to say that cyclones never manage to cross the equator.


- Knights -




Replies:
Posted By: anum
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2007 at 06:20
well i think it would just stop turning in the equater


Posted By: Panther
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2007 at 08:15
Thanks for sharing Knights. Are you interested in the science of Meteorology? Just curious.


Posted By: Paul
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2007 at 08:15
nothing it would continue spinning the same direction.
 
Next time you empty your bath note the direction the water spins. Insert your finger and spin the opposite way. It will continue the way you span it. The Earth's spinning motion influences the way things spin but it is a small force, if something builds up motion the other way it has negligiable effect.
 


-------------
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk - http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk - http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk


Posted By: Panther
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2007 at 08:50

Actually, it would indeed fall apart, due to the very weakness of the Coriolis effect at the equator: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_effect - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_effect



Posted By: Knights
Date Posted: 29-Dec-2007 at 07:51
@Panther

Natural, Earth and Environmental sciences in general; Meteorology is definitely a key interest of mine.

That Wikipedia article on the Coriolis effect is very complex indeed! Though come to think of it, diagrams trying to visualise its effect on the earth aren't simple - it just isn't a simple process.

To me the idea that [in the event of actually crossing the equator] a cyclone would just change direction is ludicrous. If the opposing force was anything significant the cyclone would become churned and lose circular motion.


-------------


Posted By: Panther
Date Posted: 30-Dec-2007 at 01:09
Natural and Earth science is very interesting to me as well. The science of the enviroment is still way too young for me too warrant it of much greater significant importance above that of meteorology. Hence, it is subject to being relegated to a supporting role in any meteorological department. Perhaps, that is just me... expressing a view of a bygone era?
 
Anyways... I liked that wikipedia article too, mainly for the diagrams showing the impossiblity of such an event occuring.



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com