Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

the best and worst colony

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Cywr View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6003
  Quote Cywr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: the best and worst colony
    Posted: 12-Oct-2005 at 17:23
With a complex empire structure like the Aztecs or Inca, all you have to do is defeat the centralsied state, and you inherit the means and infrustructure to continue in their place. In the case of Mexico, it was simply a matter of replacing Tenochtitlan with Madrid (or was it Toledo), no need to build a new society as it were, just rearrange the existing one.
Arrrgh!!"
Back to Top
Constantine XI View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
  Quote Constantine XI Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Oct-2005 at 22:01
Some Tasmanian aborigines still do exist, though the numbers are pitifully small. Tasmania is an exception in that its colonization was almost entirely convict for the first few generations. Combining this with governors (or perhaps warders would be a better term) who could only be described as tyrranical left both convicts and aborigines in dire straits. Once the disease had done its work, destroying the local population was more than easy for the deranged ex-convicts who had been pardoned and wanted no one to interfere with their prospects of freedom and prosperity.
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Oct-2005 at 04:15
Originally posted by Cywr

In the case of Mexico, it was simply a matter of replacing Tenochtitlan with Madrid (or was it Toledo),


It was nothing. Castile didn't have a central Capital until Philip II, who declared Madrid, a small town before his reign, to become his capital. Valladolid probably centralized the functions of government somehow but the King and the Court was still semi-nomadic at the time. Seville would later acquire the centrality for colonial matters but for some time it was Cdiz and before there was no specific seat.

Toledo held some Court (Parlament) meetings but just like any other Castilian city, it never recovered the capitality that held with the Visigoths. Main tribunals were in Valladolid and Seville.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.082 seconds.