Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Russian Hostage Crisis

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345
Author
Kalevipoeg View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Estonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1458
  Quote Kalevipoeg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Russian Hostage Crisis
    Posted: 22-Sep-2004 at 12:17

"Kuidas ksi kib?"

There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible than a man in the depths of an ether binge...
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Sep-2004 at 15:12

"Kuidas ksi kib?"

Horosho, spasibo! Btw, I don't actually known Estonian. I got it from a phrasebook I have.

"2. Does the Chechens want ethnic cleansing by Russian troops to continue? No. You intend to keep 1 million angry people under the rule for sake of 20,000 Russians? Just get them out!"

Firstly, there is no ethnic cleansing by Russian troops. Secondly, there are 500,000 Chechnyans in Chechnya. Thirdly, and most importantly, if you think my only reason for the continued Russian military presence in Chechnya is to guarantee the safety of the 20,000 Russians in Chechnya, you have obviously not been paying attention to my posts.

"3. I already told you comrade that CHECHENS ARE SUFIS and NOT WAHABISTS! Next time I am going to call Russians Communists for the good measure."

Pray point out the post in which I said Chechens are Wahhabists. Let me refresh you. I said that there is Wahhabist influence in Chechnya, because of the inflow of foreign mujahedeen and money for terrorism (primarily from Saudi Arabia in both cases). And Arabia is a Wahhabist state, and has been since the 18th century. Plus, Chechnya's government 1996-99 was Wahhabist, like it or not, that's a fact. (Incidentally enough, Muslims in Russia don't tend to be very Muslim...for instance, many wouldn't hesistate to drink alcohol, because of the centuries old Russian cultural influence ).

Yeah, call Russians communists if you wish - you'll be right about 20% of the time. Few in Russia would take it as an insult. For instance, although I have problems with the political repression and economic (mis)management in the USSR, I agreed with its pre-Brezhnivite isolationism from the world economy,  and for good reason as I have already explained in this thread.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Sep-2004 at 15:21

"1. Russia is already a capital of crime.... and no punishment much to the grief of Dostoevsky. "

Ah, I figured out what you were trying to imply by this...you think Russia is not different from Chechnya in terms of criminality. Well, if anything, that shows the depth of your ignorance. I don't deny that, especially in the big cities, Russia has very high levels of crime, in excess probably of even American rates. But at least, unlike in Chechnya, we don't have groups of armed bandits running around in the countryside, terrorizing the population, and a huge refugee problem, and 80% unemployment, and surviving off subsidies and constantly having gov't infrastructure attacked, etc.

Btw, I doubt you'd make that same comment about Russia having no punishment, after you spend a few years in a Russian prison.

Back to Top
Evildoer View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 25-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 434
  Quote Evildoer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Oct-2004 at 19:15

There was a documentary on PBS showing a murder of a Russian journalist belonging to a small newspaper. The man criticized a local millionaire, and was subsequently shot by hired gangsters. The government did not even bother to investigate properly (because the News once critized them), and when they were pressed to do so by a famous lawyer, they just staged a mock trail. Actually, the judge was serving as a police private just a few days before the actual trial...

Since you insist on calling Chechen guerillas "bandits", I will retaliate by calling the Rus Army "Nazis".

1. What caused the refugee problem? The Nazi invasion.

2. Do you expect a nation that has just been shattered to pieces by Nazi shells to not have unemployment?

3. There is punishment. But then there is no crime in some cases...  

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Oct-2004 at 16:13

There is no rational argument with some of you people.

Firstly, the thing you describe first thing a) has absolutely no relevance to Chechnya, b) don't act so surprised, Russia is a kleptocracy, judges are easily bought and your accusations verssu the gov't are unbacked, stupid and easily spreadable by any old rumor-monger and c) its a disgusting propaganda tactic of 'disfigurement' of Russia right before your more or less relevant piece.

Secondly, how dare you call Russian soldiers Nazis.  Say it to most Russians, especially older people who might still have some memories of the b..tards, and you'll deeply offend most, and sometimes get a richly deserved punch in the face. How dare you label a social group, many of them unwillingly conscripted, to fight bravely and heroically against militant Islamic terrorism and common banditry.

As for the rest, bombing Grozny was a military necessity in 2000, and despite the fact of massive misappropriation of the gov't funds funneled into Chechnya and bandit/terrorist activities, its a wonder that Kadyrov actually managed to restore more or less normal life by 2003.

And Chechen "guerillas" are precisely that - bandits (OK, a few are mujahedin, but that's not any better). Many of the refugees, and in fact most of the "atrocities" in Chechnya, have been committed by these co-called 'freedom fighters' who continue to terrorize the countryside. And need I explain for the umpteenth time why Chechnya can't be released?? You have obviously read nothing of the previous posts.

Back to Top
Evildoer View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 25-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 434
  Quote Evildoer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Oct-2004 at 13:17

Oh, so the Russians arn't razing Chechenya to the ground? Even the capital city of Grozny that was populated by a large Russian minority was not spared - 700,000 died in one attack. What about rape, mass murder and torture? Are organization like Amnesty just making these stories up for fun???

Are the acts mentioned above any different from what the Nazis did to Russians during World War II?

Those who fight Nazis can be Nazis as well. Can anyone deny that Zionist Fascists (Shamir, Begin, Irgun Organization, Israeli Army) conducted mass murder and rape of Palestinian people during the "refounding" of Israel just as Nazis did? Is it worse for SS men to kill 100 Jews in a forest in Bavaria than it is for the Zionist Fascists to kill 100 Palestinians in the dessert? NO.

Thus, even the victims of the holocaust can turn into the oppressor and the scoundrel. Thus, I am justified in calling Russian military occupying Chechenya Nazi.

Normal life in Chechnya... stop joking around. Any Chenchen in his land can be dragged to a concentration camp, beaten to pulp and labled as "missing". And that was from the 54 Hours: Survivor's Account of the Moscow Theatre Crisis by Nedkov (he is Bulgarian). Even if this did not exist, then there are ruins everywhere and dead family members.

Mujaheddin  is based on Wahabism from Saudi Arabia. Prominent religion in Chechenya is Sufism, which is much more innovative, moderate and mystical. The people you lable as "bandits" belong to this wider branch - they are the true freedom fighters.

By the way, just because a bandit covers his head with a helmet and puts a military uniform on with shoulder pads, it dosn't mean he can alter his status.

I have heard that Beslan School Taking might have been planned by Putin himself. No wonder, since he is related to the KGB and since it is very likely that he planned the previous Apartment bombings to help him in the elections. I will write more on when I have time (I have to take notes on 10 pages of history text... ahhhhh!!!)

Reply now.

 



Edited by Evildoer
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Oct-2004 at 15:11

I was not going to bother with this topic any more, since you basically regurgitate already answered agruments. However, your use of the imperative without a 'please' annoyed me enough for me to make a reply.

Firstly, 700,000??? Give me a break dude. The population of Chechnya itself is 500,000. Even serious Western estimates of the number killed in the Chechen wars are around 30,000-50,000. I do not know if it counts in the 20,000 Russians who died in the Chechen ethnic cleansing of 250,000 Russians in 1991-94.

Secondly, as I have said on numerous occasions Chechnya is a fundamentally lawless place, a jungle (or rather hilly area) where only the strongest survive. It has been like that yesterday (including to some extent even during the USSR), today and most probably tomorrow. Armed bandits run loose around the countryside, looting, raping, killing, etc, things that get blamed on the Russian army (despite the much-improved situation over when Chechnya was functionally independent).

Thirdly, don't even bother comparing Chechnya to Palestine. The situations are completely different.

Fourthly, you think the FSB just drags off any odd person on Grozny's street. Think again, these are bandits who have been lived on murder and robbery for years. I am not arrogant to enough to say there aren't any mistakes (there inevitably would be a few), but that's the price Chechnya must pay for internal peace and order.

Fifthly, just give me the quote where I say life in Chechnya is "normal". I said "more or less normal", and the definition of "normality" in Chechnya, is rather different than your's or mine. All I will say is that after it's much more normal than in 1996-99, when the "gov't" of Chechnya, with President Maskhadov, misappropriated all the reconstruction funds sent from Russian taxpayers and salaries weren't payed, schools were closed, bandits totally dominated the countryside, Chechnya was a criminal and terrorist base and sharia was the law of the land. (BTW, it is quite sad, but hardly surprising to have seen the Western media being barely able to cover their joy at Kadyrov's assassination, who had done so much for Chechnya.)

Sixthly, yes I know Sufism is the religion of most Chechens. Where did I deny this? Wahhabism is an import from Saudi Arabia in the 1996-99 period, when sharia became law (and if you know the first thing about it, sharia belongs to the Middle Ages), and other "progressive" things were done, e.g. closing schools. And why did Maskhadov import Wahhabism? He wanted the funds and weaponry that went with it from Saudi fundie oil baron b..tards who have nothing better to do with their time and cash than spread their own stupid fundamentalism.

There are no "freedom fighters" in Chechnya. Most are bandits. I'll give you my definition: "An armed thief who is (usually) a member of a band", just to clear up any doubts. Some are mujahedeen who fight to establish an Islamic Respublic (btw, when Basayev invaded Russia in 1996 he wanted to establish the "Islamic Republic of Chechnya and Daghestan", and Daghestan is a rather more progressive Muslim region in Russia where thousands of men volunteered to fight off the attack, wanting nothing to do with fundamentalism). A very few, admittedly, are genuine nationalists who want an independent Chechnya. What they tragically don't understand, if that Chechnya can never be independent and at peace because of the still fundamentally tribal nature of its society (I've already explained it in more detail above).

Those are totally unbased conspiracy theorists. The very same type of residue was found in the apartment bombings as in Osama bin Laden's bombings of the African embassies at around the same time. And as for the very suggestion that Putin organized Beslan...dude, you might as well join the "Queen Elizabeth II and British Royal Family are actually Lizards bent on World Domination" club, at least that is about 37.82 times more credible than that (yes, I am not joking, I really have heard of this particular conspiracy theory).

What need I say? I wasted about 30 mins of my life in replying to this regurgitated nonsense. From now, I guarantee you, I will not do it again, unless you come up with something new instead of propagandistic drivel I have replied to earlier in this thread (btw, please, DO READ ALL THIS THREAD that concerns Chechnya). I also lead a busy life and I don't normally bother to repeat myself, when the answer is already given, as I have done this time.

Have a nice day.



Edited by Lord Anatolius
Back to Top
Evildoer View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 25-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 434
  Quote Evildoer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Oct-2004 at 18:25

That was a mistake - the numbers should have been 50,000 for Grozny. But your disgusting statement that the whole war only cost Chechenya 50,000 is laughable. There were 1,200,000 people before the war - now there is 500,000. Where has the 700,000 gone?

Your rubbish about "Islamic fundementalism" in Chechenya is without basis. Where is your source?

For the rest of your pile of lies: If you were a German during WWII, you would have written similar things about Russian "bandits" who were extorting money from the peasents, smashing railroads, destroying wearhouses. You would also rant against the "Red Threat" that was meancing the Western Civillization, which Germany was fighting to save.

As for who started the war, you would accuse the Russians of cowardly attacking the Germans without warning and bash all those that oppose you with the lable "conspiracy-theorists" who will do anything to blame the Germans.

 

 



Edited by Evildoer
Back to Top
Kalevipoeg View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Estonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1458
  Quote Kalevipoeg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Oct-2004 at 01:56

Yes Lord Anatolius, no solid proof from your side on the matter other than repeat of us not believing you.

"And as for the very suggestion that Putin organized Beslan...dude, you might as well join the "Queen Elizabeth II and British Royal Family are actually Lizards bent on World Domination" club, at least that is about 37.82 times more credible than that (yes, I am not joking, I really have heard of this particular conspiracy theory)."

Just look at the Russia of today, Putin is a dictator, no free TV programs and journalism. Putin will probably be "elected" president for the next 2 presidencies. He is just gathering all of the possible power he can get in Russia and i don't think 338 people are not too big of a price to pay for that kind of a xontrol over Russia.

"(BTW, it is quite sad, but hardly surprising to have seen the Western media being barely able to cover their joy at Kadyrov's assassination, who had done so much for Chechnya.)"

That is one thing an imperialist nation can never understand. No matter how Kadyrov had ruled or did rule doesn't make him anything more than a Russian puppet (he got the job from Russia right???) and that isn't freedom.

There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible than a man in the depths of an ether binge...
Back to Top
Evildoer View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 25-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 434
  Quote Evildoer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Oct-2004 at 05:25
There are absolutely no garentees that Russian-controlled Chechen elections are totally rigged. In British Palestine, there was an election for teh Mufti, and the person who got the 5th greatest number of votes was elected.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Oct-2004 at 06:45

"That was a mistake - the numbers should have been 50,000 for Grozny. But your disgusting statement that the whole war only cost Chechenya 50,000 is laughable. There were 1,200,000 people before the war - now there is 500,000. Where has the 700,000 gone?"

Firstly, I got the figure from Samuel Huntington's "The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order". Admittedly, this was before the second Chechen War (but after the first), but the first one was incomparably more bloody. Secondly, the Chechen diaspora in the Russian Federation outside Chechnya numbers about 700,000.

Also, the statement "Your rubbish about "Islamic fundementalism" in Chechenya is without basis. Where is your source?" is absolutely stupid on your part. Possibly, the fact that the Maskhadov gov't 1996-99 was Wahhabist? The fact that Chechnya is swarming with foreign (most Arab) jihadis? As for sources, you can find it anywhere. Try Google and type in keywords such as "Chechnya" "Maskhadov" "1996-1999" "Islamic fundamentalism" "Wahhabism" etc. Feel free to do your own damn homework.

As for the conspiracy theories, yes they are just that. I even read a BBC article that reported the connection between the Moscow apartment and the African embassy bombings, but I cannot find it in their search engines. As for the Beslan school seige, how on earth could Putin organize that? Why would people just want to do it for him, knowing they would die? What would the consequences be if found out??

@Kalevipoeg,

There is freedom of speech in Russia. For instance, most newspapers heavily critisized Putin following Beslan. And can you check the Russian Internet? No you can't.

And I have already explained why giving Chechnya independence is suicide.  Plus, Kadyrov was democratically elected to power with a good majority. Despite the fact that the Chechen mullahs declared a fatwa on anybody who didn't vote.

Back to Top
Evildoer View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 25-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 434
  Quote Evildoer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Oct-2004 at 07:09

No, you can find it for me.  Plus much of that info is manipulated - what do you expect will get out of an authoritarian country? Not much but lies.

"Both Wars:

  • 11 Nov. 2002 Time: 38,000 combatants + 200,000 civilians
  • 11 Nov. 2002 Newsweek: 100,000 civilians"

http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat5.htm

So stop giving me death tolls only from the first "bloodier" war.

Your questions are patheic

1. What can't  a KGB thug not organize?

2. Some people are willing to give their lives to earn money for their families rather than let them starve.  - Or alternative scenario: Is there any garentee that Putin dosn't have loyal Chechen followers within the Secret Police who are willing to die for his cause?

3. What if they are not found out? A KGB thug seldom makes mistakes in his operations. Terrorists get the blame, they have the whole nation and even the world behind them in this war in Chechnya.

Izveta (spelling?) was closed down for "too emotional" coverage of Beslan.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Oct-2004 at 14:25

"1. What can't  a KGB thug not organize?"

You don't seem to realize that the KGB was much more than a few shady black-uniformed guys around the block corner. It was a whole bureacracy, and Putin was little more than a high-placed official in that bureacracy.

"2. Some people are willing to give their lives to earn money for their families rather than let them starve.  - Or alternative scenario: Is there any garentee that Putin dosn't have loyal Chechen followers within the Secret Police who are willing to die for his cause?"

People don't starve in Russia. Maybe in the early 1990's, maybe in the future, but not nowadays. And the second possibility is simply ridiculous for anyone with some sense of psychology.

"3. What if they are not found out? A KGB thug seldom makes mistakes in his operations. Terrorists get the blame, they have the whole nation and even the world behind them in this war in Chechnya. "

There were 20 terrorists, IIRC. That's an awful amount of people to persuade. And how do you explain the presence of, was it, 10 Arabs and a black? You make a mistake. The only people who are behind the terrorists are those not involved in the Chechen conflict, with the honourable exception of Iran, a few Muslim states and AFAIK India.

"Izveta (spelling?) was closed down for "too emotional" coverage of Beslan. "

Which is why its still working http://www.izvestia.ru/.

"Your questions are patheic"

The opinion is mutual.

 

About the death toll:

I've given you my source, Samuel Huntington "The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order". He is an American and wrote the book in the US.

You have still to retract you statement that the death toll is "700,000". As for the website you've given, quote the whole damn thing:

    1. Russia (1994 et seq.)
    2. War in Chechnya, 1994-96
      • 16 May 2001 AP: Russian soldiers: 3,826 kia + 1,906 mia in 21 mos.
      • Amnesty International: 20-30,000 ("Russian Federation: Brief summary of concerns about human rights violations in the Chechen Republic" (April 1996) [http://www.amnesty.org/ailib/aipub/1996/EUR/44602096.htm] )
        • cited by Amnesty International: Russian Presidential Commission for Human Rights: 27,000
      • Global Security: "1,500 Russian troops and 25,000 civilians had died by April 1995"
      • SIPRI 1997: 10,000-40,000 (1994-96)
      • War Annual 8 (1997): 40,000
      • CDI: 50,000 (1994-96)
      • Dictionary of 20C World History: 80,000
      • Ploughshares 2000: 80-100,000
      • 6 Dec. 1999 Time: 4,000 Russian soldiers + 100,000 Chechens, 1994-96
    • Renewed fighting, 1999
      • 6 Dec. 1999 Time: 4,000
      • Ploughshares 2000: >5,000
      • 16 May 2001 AP: 3,096 Russian soldiers in 20 mos.
    • Both Wars:
      • 11 Nov. 2002 Time: 38,000 combatants + 200,000 civilians
      • 11 Nov. 2002 Newsweek: 100,000 civilians
  • Even there you can see many different statistics being offered (btw, the official statistics on numbers of Russian army deaths is 15,000 in the first war, 5,000 in the second. Also the statistics in no ways mean that the Russian Army caused the majority, or even a significant minority, of the civilian deaths. First you've got the Russian army fighting bandits, then you've got the bandits attacking civilians, remember.

    "No, you can find it for me.  Plus much of that info is manipulated - what do you expect will get out of an authoritarian country? Not much but lies."

    Check out these sites:

    http://www.untimely-thoughts.com/?art=736&action=printer

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/chechnya-ba ck.htm

    In particular, this description. I've read the intro and think it is one of the most accurate Western evaluations of the conflict. After finishing readint the Intro, click "next" on the top left hand corner. There are six such pages.

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2000/04/ white/part01.htm

    Back to Top
    Guests View Drop Down
    Guest
    Guest
      Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Jun-2005 at 17:15

    The terrorist attack was a really crime against humanity, but this is a fact russian invasion dehumanized many chechens over years. I dont know how can russians solve this problem and i am not sure about they have the capability to solve this problem.

    Back to Top
     Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345

    Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

    Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
    Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

    This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.