Rif and Raff again sieza the day

Ummm, you either weren't around yet or old enough to remember the 60's as well as I do.
What's going on now are minor disturbances compared to what went on in the mid 60's.
This isn't anything new. However it seems that most cities are better prepared for this kind of stuff.
In 65 a good chunk of Phila was burning before they realized what was happening.

It doesn't help matters any with Trump running his mouth, with his brain in neutral.

And failure of progressive policies? How about not enough progressive policies and an attitude of benign neglect of the inner cities.
The impact of economic stress is usually first felt in the poorest areas where the people have less ability to adjust. It doesn't take much to turn unrest into disobedience.














Edited by red clay - 22-Sep-2016 at 22:10

In America... its simple..federal military intervention..is forbidden in general..as for my old pard's interp? it remains the liberal progressive failed view. the gawddamn anarchists need to be prosecuted...period. Either love the law.. defend it... like his Dad and and son did...and my boy did ..or get the hell out... period.

We will always defend the change lawful...the adaption or the improvement of the law as directed by the C of the USA.... but what we will not ...defend.. is the anarchists and those who agitate them. period.

Ill personnally ride, even at my age, against those treanorous son's a bitches. amen.

And yes'r Red I was there. sSo get the hell over that fact that u aint that much older than me..

Originally posted by Centrix Vigilis In America... its simple..federal military intervention..is forbidden in general..as for my old pard's interp? it remains the liberal progressive failed view. the gawddamn anarchists need to be prosecuted...period. Either love the law.. defend it... like his Dad and and son did...and my boy did ..or get the hell out... period. We will always defend the change lawful...the adaption or the improvement of the law as directed by the C of the USA.... but what we will not ...defend.. is the anarchists and those who agitate them. period. Ill personnally ride, even at my age, against those treanorous son's a bitches. amen. And yes'r Red I was there. sSo get the hell over that fact that u aint that much older than me..

Your thinking I condone or support the actions of a few social outcasts. You should know better.
While I believe the actors should be prosecuted to the full extent, there were many who were exercising their right to demonstrate and protest what they perceive as a social injustice, peacefully.
Bring Red Sr. into this, were he alive he'd be the first to tell you that's what he fought a war for, to preserve that right.

And if your pulling that old BS line, Love it or leave it, and your directing it at me, you sir can kiss my rosy red Irish ass.

Well, Im not liberal at all. I think in the past I was liberal but today I must be this what you described as "far right meathead".

Im against abortion, Im against gay rights, Im against legalisation of homosexual marriages, Im against adoption of children by homosexual couples, Im against mass migration of millions africans and arabs to Europe, Im against great corporations and jewish banks, Im against geneticaly modified food and political corecktness.

However I support the family and protection of families with children by the state, I support small and medium size companies and family buissnes. I support free education, healthcare and equal chances for all the children. I support cooperative banks, ecologic agriculture and sanity.

I would also introduce a tax on all homosexual couples and money from this tax I would use to help poor famillies with many children.