Rohani, the next Iranian president

I heard that he is a reformist so good luck with him

If Rohani is a threat to the Islamic regime and the 'status quo', he would have been eliminated by the authorities just like the other candidates. He is nothing more than a new face of a regime in which the Supreme Leader is the most powerful player.

Edited by Shamshir - 15-Jun-2013 at 23:13

Last night the people of Iran became happy again after some years, some photos from Farsnews:

That's ironic. Same night Turks were also on street as people in Iran but for different purpose.  

Rohani? The Chief negotiator?

Another faux gesture to get pressure off on going nuc weapons grade development, military modernization and proliferation. Not to mention ongoing support of the Mullah's anti-Semite agenda....and fanatic Islamist terrorism.

Snakes in the grass also bite. Even when they appear benign. And this one's attempts to obfuscate his previous and ongoing support of the aforementioned and his relationship with them is clear...if ya look.


But the Jew haters and enemies of the democratic, modern west will continue to promote his progressiveness. Horseshit.


http://www.rferl.org/content/mahdavi-azad-interview-rohani/25022981.html

Originally posted by Ollios @Centrix Vigilis I couldn't look at your source. However don't you think that your speech is ruthless? He is just new elected politician. Give him a chance and don't wait to many things. Real change in Iran won't come with election. It will be more bloody.

Check the reference at Radio Free Europe.

Ruthless?


Nope. The fact remains this new proxy 'faux moderate' leader is dedicated to the Mullahs and their insanity. IF YOU READ THE INTERVIEW YOU WILL SEE IT. I've seen this crap since 79. Same old tired game. Bring an 'alleged' moderate in to alleviate the concerns and obfuscate intent. Only the dumb ass's in Euro land, the US and the ME, believe that more negotiation...more babble....more genuflection to terrorism versus eradication....is the answer. Same fools who have allowed this to happen since 79....deluded fools.

The Russians and the PRC and the fanatics in Saudi Arabia, know better. But they wont tell ya the truth either.

Solution? Don't believe him anymore then those he serves which is only the fanatics in Iran. Blockade their coastline. Freeze all international assets. Support opposition and help them if they rise. In this you are correct.

But with Obama?


Forget it.

''Do you think that world policy of USA is logical?




What do we know about Israel nuclear weapons? Nothing. They are undeclared nuclear power. Every sources says that they had, but they still deny. What's the difference from Iran?




Does USA have any plan to blockade India, Pakistan and Israel which don't sign Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons? I don't think.




I am not fan of mullahs but also I don't want to see a Middle East which have been dicided on military table of Pentagon ''

************************************************************

1. Not at this time as the ongoing diplo-babble and genuflection and dialog are useless at this point. Military action is now long overdo.

2. Whether the IG has the weapons is immaterial; they are not representing a threat of Islamist terrorism, And continuous disruption to the region or threat to the democratic west. Or advocating an anti-Semitic or other genocide.

3. It is to the mutual advantage of the Indians and the democratic west to contain the Pakistani's who also are, in part, representative of Islamist terrorism and it's support; direct, indirect, covert and overt (as are the Saudi's for that matter at certain levels). This is the foundation and primary reason of the presence of the weapons to include their long held antipathy against each other.

And yes, I am confident the US DOD War plans division; has contingency plans for containment or destruction of any nuclear weapons state's weapons or weapons making ability. Tis the nature of the development of strategy to a perceived threat. My own prior experience tells me this is so.



4. As it is not being directly decided by regional governments to include Turkey or alleged alliances; even when it is viewed as a threat to their existence, or because of religious and or ideological agendas and economic interests, it falls by default to the Pentagon.

Moral cowardice is the first step towards affiliation and the brother of appeasement when faced by a threat.


Wake up over there Ollios...your enemy was never the Israelis or the Americans; but the fanatics in your own country, the region and in particular, the Iranian mullahs. And if you do not encourage others to recognize this, then you too serve the agenda of the fanatics as an unwitting accomplice.

What would Ataturk do?

Eliminate the threat. This is your proper course.

Remember your great leader.


I do.

Edited by Centrix Vigilis - 21-Jun-2013 at 11:30

To include European democracies.

The Afghans tribal cultural basis has been rejecting any interference long before Mohammed's, 'may he rest in peace', followers ever brought his dictums across the mountains.

To see them reject any interference is traditional...but they have poor memories...they forget who helped them eliminate the Russians and; the more modernist among them, albeit granted a minority, will never live to procreate..... let alone establish a free democratic state with the Terrorist fanatics amongst AQ and the Tban...amongst them.

The IG doesn't have to be popular or 'pc' when it comes to national security. Hence the rhetoric by the Mad Mullahs, in desiring eradication of Israel as a nation state and a world genocide directed towards Jews trumps the Palistinian homeland question. And those who would violently support it. It is the Mullahs and the fanatics who must change. Eliminate the threatening and the attitudes will change over time. this continuing to deny the right of the IG to exist is fallacious and theologically delusional.

Ataturk eliminated threats. Period. You know it and I do.

As for accepting or choosing? That depends on the 'lesser' of the evil as perceived by the viewer eh.

But you certainly don't have to accept mine. I told you I like you and would see no harm come to your country to include the idiot fanatics there, anymore then I would mine. Dissention is democracy. Ntl, lunacy must be contained if not eliminated.

Ataturk knew that as well.