Will the Boston bombing change American attitudes

You can find the related story on the Washington Post; Robert P. Jones, 25 April issue.

Bl...there is a nexus between the possibility of extremist Islamist using the porous borders as a means of entry. That 'sleeper type' cells might exist is also a concern.

Ntl the idiots on the far right are attempting a nexus in a specific manner tied to a specific incidence of terror. And it's weak.


Should there be more vigilant and ongoing checks of those who are near entry under the legal method. Sure, cant hurt.

But to attempt to tie it to the millions of illegals...who have been here for a while.... falls short as the data shows there has yet to be an incident involving an illegal. Possible? sure.


Are they lawbreakers? you bet. Ntl, the illegal immigration issue needs to be resolved. And the latest effort goes a long way to doing it.

The only remaining concern for this amnesty...it's not reform perse afaic......and that's what it is.... no matter the counter propo.....is whether the border is even further strengthened and secured and in 10 years we don't have another 12 million here raping the taxpayer. Or being prepped as future terrorists.


But to attempt a tie in... in an 'after fact' mode of two legal immigrants who may or may have not been extremist minded...when they first arrived...and after seeking asylum... to those already here is to weak.

Edited by Centrix Vigilis - 27-Apr-2013 at 11:06