Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Mighty Asian Navies! Posted: 11-Jul-2005 at 15:59 |
china's navy is testing, not for war now. we only produce 1 or 2 ships each type. just for improving our war industry, to get salted shipmen. it's not wartime now, unnecessary waste money to built too many ships. just keep developing the newest tech and train good shipmen is enough.
|
|
|
doorman
Janissary
Joined: 16-Jun-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Jul-2005 at 17:50 |
Originally posted by I/eye
Korea: not retiring, replacing.. with 4000t/5000t/9000+t destroyers
depending on U.S. tech: buying the best money can buy |
Old WWII vessels are retired while new vessels are commissioned. I
don't see this transition to be completed until well into the next
decade.
|
|
doorman
Janissary
Joined: 16-Jun-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Jul-2005 at 17:52 |
Originally posted by sinosword
china's navy is testing, not for war now. we only
produce 1 or 2 ships each type. just for improving our war industry, to
get salted shipmen. it's not wartime now, unnecessary waste
money to built too many ships. just keep developing
the newest tech and train good shipmen is
enough. |
Lack of access to western tech is going to seriously hamper progress.
The Russian monopoly doesn't help in a way. They get to call the shots
on what to give you or not.
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Jul-2005 at 18:06 |
so we will depend on ourself. our war industry is trying their best to be independent, in fact we have already been the most independent war industry in asia.
|
|
|
doorman
Janissary
Joined: 16-Jun-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Jul-2005 at 18:07 |
Originally posted by sinosword
so we will depend on ourself. our war industry is
trying their best to be independent, in fact we have already been the
most independent war industry in asia. |
Yeah, but doing it on your own is very slow and painful way of going
about it. It will take you longer than if you imported the technologies
to start with.
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Jul-2005 at 18:15 |
yes of course we know that. but we will conquer any difficulties because the first step is the most difficult. with our economy and tech progress to make our own weapons will be more easily in the future. there are a lot of countries like france make their own weapons, so will we.
|
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Jul-2005 at 23:11 |
china msa's new equipment.
Ѳ31112.8ף13.8ףˮ4.38ףˮ3000? ֣?2ϡ18ںʱΪ6000Գ?? ?0졣
L112.8m W13.8m D4.38m tonnage3000t max speed 22kts max sail range 6000sea mile/18kts
max mission time 40days
Edited by sinosword
|
|
|
I/eye
Baron
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 498
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jul-2005 at 15:14 |
Originally posted by doorman
Originally posted by I/eye
Korea: not retiring, replacing.. with 4000t/5000t/9000+t destroyers
depending on U.S. tech: buying the best money can buy
|
Old WWII vessels are retired while new vessels are commissioned. I don't see this transition to be completed until well into the next decade. |
checking, actually, ex-U.S. WWII vessels that the Korean navy use are landing ships.. they've built replacement landing ships in the 90's, and the new LPX (of which 1st is already launched) is going further than replacing
the KDX is not there to replace old ships.. they are there to turn Korean navy into a bluewater navy..
alreay got 3 4000t and 4 5500t destroyers.. with more 5500t/9000+t destroyers to come
|
[URL=http://imageshack.us]
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jul-2005 at 18:23 |
JDS Kashima TV 3508 pix were taken by chinese military fan feixue in russia. 3508ǹ1992ƻѵڶодģϰʱ ūڶëӵľ½ͻȻӾ磬Dzòëթ ..... ūռʶп˺3508¹ ֶԶڶУʥ˵ñ˷ʡ TV Kashima Training ship The propulsion system of the new type training vessel (TV), which was decided to be constructed in 1992 fiscal year, is CODOG 2 type with each two of SM l C gas turbine and diesel engine. The SM IC gas turbines were manufactured by KHI, and the diesel engines were manufactured by MHI. The vessel was built at Hitachi Zosen Co. (HZ), entered into sea trial in 1994 and was completed at the end of 1994 fiscal year. Class Warship number (Hull Number) Warship name (Ship's Name) 3508 Kashima (city in Ibaraki Prefecture) Principal efficiency compendium Standard displacement: 4,050 tons Boundary dimension: Length 143m Width 18.0m Depth 12.3m Draft 4.6m Boat shape: Long forecastle type Main machine device: Gas turbines 2 Diesel 2 basis 2 axis Horse power: 27000PS Maximum Speed: 25kt Principal soldier equipment: 62 aperture 76 millimeter rapid fire gun 1 Water discharge tube 2 Crew: 360 name s
screen.width
Edited by sinosword
|
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jul-2005 at 18:25 |
|
|
|
I/eye
Baron
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 498
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Jul-2005 at 03:58 |
that's a lot of scroll, buddy..
maybe you could've just put the links to the pictures, maybe with a short description or something..
|
[URL=http://imageshack.us]
|
|
Laelius
Consul
Joined: 22-Oct-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 354
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Jul-2005 at 11:14 |
That was the most irritating post I have ever seen, no offense slick but for future reference stacks of books and random hatches are uneccessarry.
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Jul-2005 at 15:25 |
Originally posted by I/eye
that's a lot of scroll, buddy..
maybe you could've just put the links to the pictures, maybe with a short description or something..
|
sorry! simplify already.
|
|
|