Nope milosevic did not have power over that, its was a jugoslav matter, since it was in the constitution. If it wasnt in the constitution and wasnt a law, then milos could of done something.
If your talking about bosnia, they had the right since milos already in the 1980's destroyed the constitution of yugoslavia, and the army was illegaly reorginized and hence yugoslavia no longer functioned and sieced to exist, so others had the right at the end. You cant be double standard my friend.
i cant deny some atrocities acoured by our side but nothing as horrible as what the serbians did. But again most of pics were taken from other nationalites such as croat muslim ect... as for propaganda like the picks in sprska mreza claiming those were serbian even though they were mostly taken in srbrenica, sarjevo, and vukovar ect.
And we already proved in the hagg that the number of houses were destroyed actually was added up at the beggining of the war in 1991 from the destruction of croat houses and then were added in 1995 together with serb houses.
And ill i see is just reports, non likely from the site srpska mreza. Which actually show's pictures of croat muslims ect.. then the site claiming them as serbian victims as well as false reports. Some true, but most rubbish.
the same film the same propaganda. That's all u have to offfer? I offer live footage wile your's is just a bunch of nonsence. So that's were u get ure info, no wonder you are so undereducated in this kind of field.
LOL you didn't even watch it because it isn't the same film. And it proves without a doubt everything I have been saying about western involvement in Krajina. But you won't watch it will you. U
According to the 1880 census, the Hungarians were third largest ethnic group in the Vojvodina region and made up 22.6% in the population (the largest group were Serbs with 35.5%, and the second largest were Germans with 24.4%). In the next census, in 1890, the Hungarians were the second largest group, having increased to 24.4% (The Serb participation was 34.4%, and German were 24.2%). By the 1910 census, the percent of ethnic Hungarians had increased to 28.1% (with the percent of Serbs at 33.8%, and the percent of Germans at 21.4%).
The new temporary borders established in 1918 and permanent ones defined by the Treaty of Trianon in 1920 put an end to Hungarian immigration. After World War I, present-day Vojvodina was included into the newly formed Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes (later known as the Kingdom of Yugoslavia), and settling of Hungarians declined. On the contrary, many Hungarians of Vojvodina wanted to live in the post-Trianon Hungarian state, and immigrated to Hungary, which was to be one of several emigration waves from Vojvodina. The inter war years was generally marked by a standstill of the Hungarian population. During these times, their numbers were at around 370,000 - 413,000 and they constituted 24-26% of the entire population of Vojvodina. The outbreak of the Second World War caused some disruptions in population numbers, but more importantly it created brutal tensions between the Hungarian and Serb communities."
LOL Yea thank you, Serbs were majority in Voivodina according to YOUR OWN SOURCE. Wow...thank you so much.
"
Nope milosevic did not have power over that, its was a jugoslav matter, since it was in the constitution. If it wasnt in the constitution and wasnt a law, then milos could of done something.
If your talking about bosnia, they had the right since milos already in the 1980's destroyed the constitution of yugoslavia, and the army was illegaly reorginized and hence yugoslavia no longer functioned and sieced to exist, so others had the right at the end. You cant be double standard my friend. "
Then if that is true, why was RS bound to be part of Bosnia? There was no more Yugoslavia so no more Yugoslavia law, so the Bosniaks didn't have any right forcing the Serbs to be part of Bosnia. You're own logic is a tool to defeat your own arguement.
"i cant deny some atrocities acoured by our side but nothing as horrible as what the serbians did. But again most of pics were taken from other nationalites such as croat muslim ect... as for propaganda like the picks in sprska mreza claiming those were serbian even though they were mostly taken in srbrenica, sarjevo, and vukovar ect. "
Go to the other thread, i've already provided enough thread to sink a ship with. Serbs defending their people nothing more nothing less. My sources are encylopedia and UN documents, not little ustashe neo nazi fan websites.
"And we already proved in the hagg that the number of houses were destroyed actually was added up at the beggining of the war in 1991 from the destruction of croat houses and then were added in 1995 together with serb houses. "
The Hague is a false and illegal court. Again proof you don't bother reading what I write or post.
"
And ill i see is just reports, non likely from the site srpska mreza. Which actually show's pictures of croat muslims ect.. then the site claiming them as serbian victims as well as false reports. Some true, but most rubbish. "
According to the 1880 census, the Hungarians were third largest ethnic group in the Vojvodina region and made up 22.6% in the population (the largest group were Serbs with 35.5%, and the second largest were Germans with 24.4%). In the next census, in 1890, the Hungarians were the second largest group, having increased to 24.4% (The Serb participation was 34.4%, and German were 24.2%). By the 1910 census, the percent of ethnic Hungarians had increased to 28.1% (with the percent of Serbs at 33.8%, and the percent of Germans at 21.4%).
The new temporary borders established in 1918 and permanent ones defined by the Treaty of Trianon in 1920 put an end to Hungarian immigration. After World War I, present-day Vojvodina was included into the newly formed Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes (later known as the Kingdom of Yugoslavia), and settling of Hungarians declined. On the contrary, many Hungarians of Vojvodina wanted to live in the post-Trianon Hungarian state, and immigrated to Hungary, which was to be one of several emigration waves from Vojvodina. The inter war years was generally marked by a standstill of the Hungarian population. During these times, their numbers were at around 370,000 - 413,000 and they constituted 24-26% of the entire population of Vojvodina. The outbreak of the Second World War caused some disruptions in population numbers, but more importantly it created brutal tensions between the Hungarian and Serb communities."
LOL Yea thank you, Serbs were majority in Voivodina according to YOUR OWN SOURCE. Wow...thank you so much.
"
Nope milosevic did not have power over that, its was a jugoslav matter, since it was in the constitution. If it wasnt in the constitution and wasnt a law, then milos could of done something.
If your talking about bosnia, they had the right since milos already in the 1980's destroyed the constitution of yugoslavia, and the army was illegaly reorginized and hence yugoslavia no longer functioned and sieced to exist, so others had the right at the end. You cant be double standard my friend. "
Then if that is true, why was RS bound to be part of Bosnia? There was no more Yugoslavia so no more Yugoslavia law, so the Bosniaks didn't have any right forcing the Serbs to be part of Bosnia. You're own logic is a tool to defeat your own arguement.
"i cant deny some atrocities acoured by our side but nothing as horrible as what the serbians did. But again most of pics were taken from other nationalites such as croat muslim ect... as for propaganda like the picks in sprska mreza claiming those were serbian even though they were mostly taken in srbrenica, sarjevo, and vukovar ect. "
Go to the other thread, i've already provided enough thread to sink a ship with. Serbs defending their people nothing more nothing less. My sources are encylopedia and UN documents, not little ustashe neo nazi fan websites.
"And we already proved in the hagg that the number of houses were destroyed actually was added up at the beggining of the war in 1991 from the destruction of croat houses and then were added in 1995 together with serb houses. "
The Hague is a false and illegal court. Again proof you don't bother reading what I write or post.
"
And ill i see is just reports, non likely from the site srpska mreza. Which actually show's pictures of croat muslims ect.. then the site claiming them as serbian victims as well as false reports. Some true, but most rubbish. "
lol oohhh right right, care to prove it?
LOL oohhhh
The RS wasnt a constitutive nation, to divide. They could of gone to serbia then if theyre not happy
Where's your proof that hage is illegal ?
Its not the judges the oposition to gotovina had hardly no evidence on our forces
We had the proof they did not. Simple as that.
Proof? what proof. Srpska Mreza propaganda sites. 2 videos that is the same programm. Go to the other forum you have proven nothing. Defending? what? other nations territories
I just gave u proof of the false pictures, that were used in that site
Your own logic defeats you, you just proven that you have been agressors from milos to this.
Nope the wikipedia article clearly states that the majorty before ww1 wasnt serbian. And was declined after it was given to serbia after the world war. Learn to read
The RS wasnt a constitutive nation, to divide. They could of gone to serbia then if theyre not happy"
So what gave Bosniaks the right to attack RS?
"Where's your proof that hage is illegal ?
Its not the judges the oposition to gotovina had hardly no evidence on our forces
We had the proof they did not. Simple as that. "
NATO can not make any courts in the way they did. Almost all of the members are hand picked by Albright, again illegal. If courts like this were allowed to be made, the UN wouldn't exist. NATO violated its own laws. NATO is for defence and to defend only when NATO member countries are attacked. They also violated their own law not to force any aggressive treaty upon any nation. They did.
"Proof? what proof. Srpska Mreza propaganda sites. 2 videos that is the same programm. Go to the other forum you have proven nothing. Defending? what? other nations territories"
You're such a brain washed child. The video clearly shows Croatian soldiers executing civilians.
"I just gave u proof of the false pictures, that were used in that site"
No you didn't You just posted some pictures of destroyed houses and some guy drinking.
"Your own logic defeats you, you just proven that you have been agressors from milos to this."
How was milosevic the aggressor by taking autonomy partially away from voivodina? You said that if Milosevic did that there was no more Yugoslavia. IF there was no more Yugoslavia the RS shouldn't be forced to be part of Bosnia. There was no laws linking it to Bosnia. Simple as that.
"Nope the wikipedia article clearly states that the majorty before ww1 wasnt serbian. And was declined after it was given to serbia after the world war. Learn to read"
You can't read.
According to the 1880 census, the Hungarians were third largest ethnic group in the Vojvodina region and made up 22.6% in the population (the largest group were Serbs with 35.5%, and the second largest were Germans with 24.4%). In the next census, in 1890, the Hungarians were the second largest group, having increased to 24.4% (The Serb participation was 34.4%, and German were 24.2%). By the 1910 census, the percent of ethnic Hungarians had increased to 28.1% (with the percent of Serbs at 33.8%, and the percent of Germans at 21.4%).
See it's nice and bold for you now. Can you read it now?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum