Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Iran Girl Gets 100 Lashes For Sex

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345
Author
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Iran Girl Gets 100 Lashes For Sex
    Posted: 16-Nov-2005 at 03:26
Anyhow, what's the big deal with adultery? In western legal codes that is not any crime, not even a misdeamanor. It can only be taken in account in divorce proccesses and simmilar civil matters.

Another thing is what you according to your faith or personal principles feel about it. But that's a private matter anyhow.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
ok ge View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 29-Aug-2005
Location: Saudi Arabia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote ok ge Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2005 at 03:36

Originally posted by Maju

But I also said that other Muslim countries that have not been under socialist rule, such as Afghanistan or Pakistan (and many others) are equally corrupt and authoritarian. Should we take this as an intrinsecal fault of Islam? I don't think so it's a problem of all poor countries without spcifical religious or ideological adscription. Yet, ex-bolshevik countries are more open minded in general, while other Muslim countries, with very few exceptions such as Turkey, Syria or RASD are pretty much intolerant and as much authoritarian and corrupt as any of the ex-soviet countries.  mentioned.

Maju, I think you forgot that you are the owner of the generalizing theory and not me. Your suggestion was:

- Brining Communism and Pot Pol-type government, will make strict Muslim countries open minded.

All what I did is I discredit your suggestion using your own word. The process goes like this:

a- If bringing communism and Pot Pol-type government will make some strict Muslim countries more open minded, then it should worked for the countries that were truely subjected to communism and Pot Pol-type government.

b-In reality it didn't work. In fact, most countries that were under the communism rule and Pot Pol-type government are corrupt and closed minded. Only exceptions of improvement is countries that moved toward the west.

Therefore, B discredit A. On other words, bringing communism or Pot Pol-type government will not result in the development toward open minded environment, if it wasn't the opposite actually.

I don't recall I said that Islam will bring modernization and improvement to any country. Only justice can do that. Something that is known since hundreds of years to the Muslim word when Ibn Taimiyah, a scholar, said: "God will bring victory to just nations, even if they were non-Muslim. And God will bring defeat to injust nations, even if they were Muslims" Just in case you are interested, this was said by the 1200's AD.

By the way, you forgot Malaysia. In fact, I consider Malaysia on the top of the most developed Muslim nations. Interesting enough, combining tradition, religion, and modernization.

D.J. Kaufman
Wisdom is the reward for a lifetime of listening ... when youd have preferred to talk.
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2005 at 03:48
I forgot Malaysia (the exception) and you forgot Bangla Desh (the extreme but a much more common type).

Anyhow forget about Pol Pot, please, let's say Stalin, which was my initial focus anyhow, as there's ben no Pol Pot in any Muslim country anyhow and his crimes make him particularly aberrant, while his anti-modernity policies do not make him better.

I say that ex-soviet countries are now backwards not because of being ex-soviet but because of trying to be capitalist in a messy way. Look at China for comparison. If the soviets would have evolved diferently in the 90s maybe they would have fallen on their feet. But they felt on their backs and being more like rigid tortoises than flexible cats, they are having many problems.

Problems that anyhow, are typical of the periphery of Capitalism, so let's not idealize either the most "western" countries: they may be more tolerant but not less corrupt. And also bewar of the US type of westernization: they want the neo-colonies to remain backwards, corrupt and police states. They want freedom only for themselves and Israel (Christian Zionism is extermely popular in the USA).

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
ok ge View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 29-Aug-2005
Location: Saudi Arabia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote ok ge Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2005 at 05:02

Well, I recall that you used Pol Pot too in your new theory of closed minded therapy. I will call it shorcutting, Maju's theory.

Originally posted by Maju

I truly think that fundamentalist countries deserve to be ruled by Stalin or Pol Pot. That would be good therapy. 

but anyhow, let us drop Pol Pot as you like. I still think you are pushing hard to defend what I like to call a "general comment". I don't think you are serious saying Stalin is a therapy to any country as much as you are not serious now that Pol Pot is a therapy to any nation.

Wait, you even said "Obviously USSR transition wasn't any success - part is to blame to Stalinism and part to Yeltsinism/Putinism", So are you still advising Stalin as a therapy?

Originally posted by Maju

I say that ex-soviet countries are now backwards not because of being ex-soviet but because of trying to be capitalist in a messy way

Actually ex-soviet countries were already backward even before trying to be capitalist in a messy way. Do you realize that no single communist country has survived passing 1990 as a country of liberalism, freedom, and wealth? The only exception is China, which is ironically just doing fine trying to be capitalist. In fact, slowly and slowly China is becoming more of a socialist rather than a communist nation.

I agree that we should not ideolize the Westerm countries, but you will have a hard time convincing me that Communist countries are better.



Edited by ok ge
D.J. Kaufman
Wisdom is the reward for a lifetime of listening ... when youd have preferred to talk.
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2005 at 05:21
Don't you think that Syria for instance is much more a progressive country than most its neighbours? Even Iraq could compare favorably before the wars.

I agree that economically Stalinism couldn't survive Toyotism. In this sense it was only good for the Fordist phase of Capitalism. But this doesn't mean that other forms of socialim won't work at all in this phase. In fact, at least in theory Toyotism offers much better conditions for true (non-disciplinary) communism to happen. Yet this discussion belong to other topics, where I have written about it but have not draw much attention.

What I meant was that sometimes radical masures are necessary. The Chinese cultural revolution is now often pointed at because of its excesses but originally was surely a good idea and, in any case, had a good effect in pushing Chinese society forwards.

In Turkey that may be Attaturkism, in Arabia maybe Baathism. Not that I am enthusiast of these regimes either but they are in many senses pushing their societies forward and not backwards, like the mullahs do.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Seko View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar
Spammer

Joined: 01-Sep-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8595
  Quote Seko Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2005 at 09:13

Adultry and accusations of sexual misconduct has been around from the beginning. In many societies the word of the accuser carries greater weight then the word of the accused. Innocent till proven guilty turns into defamation till your money runs out trying to clear your name. The message that comes out of the Quran is that accusation of someone with sexual misconduct or spreading rumors with such accusations is a very serious matter and is not looked upon lightly by God.

God used the strongest language possible to admonish those who commit such an offense by spreading rumors and repeating accusations of sexual misconduct for which they did not have a proof. The proof here, is the personal knowledge of a proof and not just hearing about a proof.

Liars often escape punishment in modern courts of law. An affadavit is all one needs to create havoc on another person. Often times the accuser (baseless or not) has the protection of the prosecution and is treated with special loving care.

The key is not to commit adultry or commit slander again. Social pressure, 4 witnesses and lashing (symbolic or real) is a deterrant. If this method of proof is not available then one's swearing to God that he/she is truthfull or not is then judged by God. Respective ramifications will follow. No party solely benefits by wealth alone or powerful representation.

Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2005 at 09:30
Let people live their lifes and let God punish them in the afterlife if that is to happen. No to religious or moralistic law! 

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Seko View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar
Spammer

Joined: 01-Sep-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8595
  Quote Seko Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2005 at 09:40
I hear you Maju. It would be nice if people would not intrude on others nor make baseless accusations. Human vices tend to create difficult situations and a governing body tends to get involved in such cases anyways. My moderate views allow me to leave such matters to God. Yet there comes a time where innocents need protection from defamation of character. Public displays of sexual intercourse by a married person are deemed inappropriate by most socieites too. The question then becomes, 'What do we do about it?' Nothing? Perhaps. Let's turn away then. Do something? What? Then send them to court. Swear to God about innocence if that is the case. Or swear that we saw something. Either way we are involved when called upon as a witness to the court system or to God.
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Nov-2005 at 00:19
I'd rather swear in false that see a harmless person harmed by unjust "justice". The best is that no such "justice" would exist but lying is not as bad as helping injustice.


Edited by Maju

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.