Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
edgewaters
Sultan
Snake in the Grass-Banned
Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Israel and its infinite existance Posted: 18-Mar-2006 at 08:11 |
Originally posted by Omar al Hashim
Originally posted by edgewaters
The Americans have a good point about the UN being irrelevant - if it
was a useful organization, it would have been on the ground in
Israel/Palestine a long time ago, implementing a solution. |
How long ago would you like it to be? The UN is 3 years older than
Israel. The UN created Israel. Israelis have been fighting the
Palestinians and their neighbours the entire time the UN has existed.
|
Well, thats very true, you know I'm just having a little wishful thinking - really, the last few years would have been an ideal time though. It's beyond any doubt that there isn't really any end to the crisis in sight. 30 years ago people who opposed intervention still might have been able to say that it would work itself out, no one can say that now.
|
|
R_AK47
Baron
Joined: 25-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 468
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Mar-2006 at 23:05 |
Creating Israel is one of the few things that the United Nations did right.
|
|
Halevi
Colonel
Joined: 16-Feb-2006
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 584
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-Mar-2006 at 05:06 |
Originally posted by R_AK47
Creating Israel is one of the few things that the United Nations did right. |
Many of my friends and family argue similarly. Why would you say that, exactly?
|
"Your country ain't your blood. Remember that." -Santino Corelone
|
|
R_AK47
Baron
Joined: 25-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 468
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 12:28 |
The United Nations has a history of screwing things up. For example, look at the situation in Bosnia that took place during the 90's. The United Nations stepped in with the goal of protecting Bosniaks from the "evil" Serbs when in fact, it was the Bosniaks that provocted the aggression. The UN, in its infinite wisdom, picked the wrong side to fight on. I could go on about other UN blunders but the point is that the UN is a worthless organization with all kinds of problems. Creating Israel is one of the few things they did right (except that they should have made it bigger). Another issue I have with the UN is that they still refuse to accept the fact that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel (and always will be) and instead insist that Tel Aviv is the capital.
|
|
edgewaters
Sultan
Snake in the Grass-Banned
Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 13:05 |
Originally posted by R_AK47
The United Nations has a history of screwing things up. For example, look at the situation in Bosnia that took place during the 90's. The United Nations stepped in with the goal of protecting Bosniaks from the "evil" Serbs when in fact, it was the Bosniaks that provocted the aggression. The UN, in its infinite wisdom, picked the wrong side to fight on. |
Debatable. Western media certainly bought into alot of manipulations from the Bosnians and Croats and has never really corrected the impressions it left. The real problem was that the UN took sides at all, since it allied itself with groups and downplayed crimes which parallelled those of the Serbs.
|
|
R_AK47
Baron
Joined: 25-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 468
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 14:10 |
Originally posted by edgewaters
Originally posted by R_AK47
The United Nations has a history of screwing things up. For example, look at the situation in Bosnia that took place during the 90's. The United Nations stepped in with the goal of protecting Bosniaks from the "evil" Serbs when in fact, it was the Bosniaks that provocted the aggression. The UN, in its infinite wisdom, picked the wrong side to fight on. |
Debatable. Western media certainly bought into alot of manipulations from the Bosnians and Croats and has never really corrected the impressions it left. The real problem was that the UN took sides at all, since it allied itself with groups and downplayed crimes which parallelled those of the Serbs. |
Either way, the UN still made a mess of the whole situation.
|
|
Lmprs
Arch Duke
Joined: 30-Dec-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1869
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 14:38 |
Originally posted by R_AK47
The United Nations has a history of screwing things up. For example, look at the situation in Bosnia that took place during the 90's. The United Nations stepped in with the goal of protecting Bosniaks from the "evil" Serbs when in fact, it was the Bosniaks that provocted the aggression. The UN, in its infinite wisdom, picked the wrong side to fight on. |
Bosnians provoked them? Or you say so just because they were Muslims?
You don't surprise me anymore. You are just a fanatical crusader.
|
|
R_AK47
Baron
Joined: 25-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 468
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 14:59 |
Originally posted by barish
Originally posted by R_AK47
The United Nations has a history of screwing things up. For example, look at the situation in Bosnia that took place during the 90's. The United Nations stepped in with the goal of protecting Bosniaks from the "evil" Serbs when in fact, it was the Bosniaks that provocted the aggression. The UN, in its infinite wisdom, picked the wrong side to fight on. | Bosnians provoked them? Or you say so just because they were Muslims?
You don't surprise me anymore. You are just a fanatical crusader. |
And you are a fanatical communist.
Edited by R_AK47
|
|
Mortaza
Tsar
Joined: 21-Jul-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 15:08 |
Well with dying a bullet bosniaks provoked them.
Infact He is right, If bosniaks have much weapon, They would not attack them.
|
|
Halevi
Colonel
Joined: 16-Feb-2006
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 584
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 20:11 |
Originally posted by R_AK47
Originally posted by edgewaters
Originally posted by R_AK47
The United Nations
has a history of screwing things up. For example, look at the
situation in Bosnia that took place during the 90's. The United
Nations stepped in with the goal of protecting Bosniaks from the "evil"
Serbs when in fact, it was the Bosniaks that provocted the
aggression. The UN, in its infinite wisdom, picked the wrong side
to fight on. |
Debatable. Western media certainly
bought into alot of manipulations from the Bosnians and Croats and has
never really corrected the impressions it left. The real problem was
that the UN took sides at all, since it allied itself with groups and
downplayed crimes which parallelled those of the Serbs. |
Either way, the UN still made a mess of the whole situation. |
And you're saying the Israel/Palestine aftermath is not a mess?
|
"Your country ain't your blood. Remember that." -Santino Corelone
|
|
R_AK47
Baron
Joined: 25-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 468
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 21:30 |
Originally posted by Halevi
Originally posted by R_AK47
Originally posted by edgewaters
Originally posted by R_AK47
The United Nations has a history of screwing things up. For example, look at the situation in Bosnia that took place during the 90's. The United Nations stepped in with the goal of protecting Bosniaks from the "evil" Serbs when in fact, it was the Bosniaks that provocted the aggression. The UN, in its infinite wisdom, picked the wrong side to fight on. |
Debatable. Western media certainly bought into alot of manipulations from the Bosnians and Croats and has never really corrected the impressions it left. The real problem was that the UN took sides at all, since it allied itself with groups and downplayed crimes which parallelled those of the Serbs. |
Either way, the UN still made a mess of the whole situation.
|
And you're saying the Israel/Palestine aftermath is not a mess?
|
It is a mess, thanks in good part to more UN mismanagement. They need to tell the "palestinians" to quit whining, get over it, and move somewhere else. All that has to be done after that is not let them return. Problem solved. I don't see why they are wasting all this time on peace plans and peace talks. A compromise is impossible to reach.
Edited by R_AK47
|
|
azimuth
Caliph
SlaYer'S SlaYer
Joined: 12-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2979
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 21:52 |
Originally posted by R_AK47
Originally posted by Halevi
Originally posted by R_AK47
Originally posted by edgewaters
Originally posted by R_AK47
The United Nations has a history of screwing things up. For example, look at the situation in Bosnia that took place during the 90's. The United Nations stepped in with the goal of protecting Bosniaks from the "evil" Serbs when in fact, it was the Bosniaks that provocted the aggression. The UN, in its infinite wisdom, picked the wrong side to fight on. |
Debatable. Western media certainly bought into alot of manipulations from the Bosnians and Croats and has never really corrected the impressions it left. The real problem was that the UN took sides at all, since it allied itself with groups and downplayed crimes which parallelled those of the Serbs. |
Either way, the UN still made a mess of the whole situation.
|
And you're saying the Israel/Palestine aftermath is not a mess?
|
It is a mess, thanks in good part to more UN mismanagement. They need to tell the "palestinians" to quit whining, get over it, and move somewhere else. All that has to be done after that is not let them return. Problem solved. I don't see why they are wasting all this time on peace plans and peace talks. A compromise is impossible to reach.
|
i have a faster more effective solution
They need to tell the "Israels who came from outside" to quit whining, get over it, and move somewhere else. All that has to be done after that is not let them return. Problem solved. I don't see why they are wasting all this time on peace plans and peace talks. A compromise is impossible to reach.
|
|
|
Ponce de Leon
Caliph
Lonce De Peon
Joined: 11-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2967
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2006 at 21:54 |
Ahh, if it only that simple. How about we just blow up "both" Palestinans "and" the jews???
That beats both your guys plans!!! Problem solve and let the "Koreans" move in because they are a hard working loving culture people who make absoultely lovely flowery designs as i can show but not show you because....because...because i dont have to!
|
|
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Oct-2006 at 07:18 |
So long as the West (Europe, America etc..) & the East Asia remain, Israel would prosper.
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
|
The Gypo
Knight
Joined: 16-Aug-2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 96
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Oct-2006 at 00:23 |
You will find most people in the Middle East dont mind Israelites. The thing they despise is the State of Israel.
Be it true or not, the Arab States see Israel as an entity with the sole purpose of breaking up the "Great Arabic Nation"
I would give anything to see the Arabs mind their own business, Egypt returning to becoming "Egyptian"- not a slave to the Arabs...
And I would hate to say it but the Palestinians are fools...Sadat managed to win them lands found to be part of their maps prior to 1967. What did they do? They threw it back it in his face and called him a traitor for shaking hands with the enemy...
In essence, every person who died trying to gain their land from 1980 onwards; died in vain because of their leader's arrogance...
|
|
|
maqsad
General
Joined: 25-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 928
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Dec-2006 at 20:14 |
Arabs see Isreal as a sort of South Africa like apartheid state[which only jews are allowed to colonize] created by rich and powerful Ashkenazis on land that they feel the turks should have turned over to the native arabs living there[in the form of a state]. This is the root of their hatred and rivalry with the nation-state of Isreal.
Unfortunately for the Arabs, Israel is backed 110% by the US, Russia, Britain, France and Germany, mainly because Jews have a tremendous amount of power and influence within the governments of these rich G8 countries as well as the mass media there.
But when it comes to the middle east, Israels PR has not been quite as successful, if word politics changed and a major power started backing arabs then Isreal may end up going into a slow decline over a 25 to 50 year period, at the end of which the nature of Israels government changes drastically[is destroyed]. Either that or they will turn the whole ME upside down and create great havoc and destruction, either directly or through proxy allies like the U.S./U.K.
|
|
pekau
Caliph
Atlantean Prophet
Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Dec-2006 at 20:58 |
I think the better question we should be asking is this can Israel and Palestine coexist? And the question should be revised, since all nations would end in the End of Time as you quoted.
And what is this great lie? Some people are mentioning that extermination of Jews in WWII is a great misconception Id like to hear about it. Does it have any good evidence?
|
Join us.
|
|
Nestorian
Pretorian
Joined: 08-Jul-2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 161
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Dec-2006 at 05:24 |
Well I suppose thats the trouble when people return to their own native land, they find other people consider that same native land theirs too.
I don't doubt for a second Jewish claims on the land they live in now, I don't doubt for a second ARab claism on the land they once lived in either.
But as we all know.
Ownership is established by force, not words, not politeness.
So, according to the criteria - which even the Arabs themselves subscribe to - Israel owns the land they re-conquered.
Sounds cynical doesn't it? THats life...thats politics...and thats how we have the political boundaries of all countries today.
|
Isa al-Masih, both God and Man, divine and human, flesh and spirit, saviour, servant and sovereign
|
|
maqsad
General
Joined: 25-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 928
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Dec-2006 at 04:58 |
Originally posted by Nestorian
Well I suppose thats the trouble when people return to their own native land, they find other people consider that same native land theirs too. I don't doubt for a second Jewish claims on the land they live in now, I don't doubt for a second ARab claism on the land they once lived in either.
|
Actually there is an interesting twist to it. The shepardic jews, who consist of about 10% of Israel's jewish population can arguably claim both Israel and Palestine as their ancestral lands. 90% of Israeli jews however are Talmudic Ashkenazi jews whose ancestral lands from a genetic perspective are just in the Northeast of the Caspian around about where Armenia and Georgia are located. These central asian/east european jews converted to Judaism and their particular sect was influenced by the Babylonian branch of Judaesm which was refined in the 10th century in what is now obviously Iraq.
Originally posted by Nestorian
But as we all know. Ownership is established by force, not words, not politeness. So, according to the criteria - which even the Arabs themselves subscribe to - Israel owns the land they re-conquered.
| Reconquered and recolonized, collectively if you lump shephardics and talmudics alltogether, perhaps then yes.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Dec-2006 at 09:51 |
As long as there is West & US & Hindus, Israel will be supreme. The doubt should be about the arabis.
|
|