Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
TeldeInduz
General
Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
|
Quote Reply
Topic: What are Indians classified as? Posted: 27-Nov-2006 at 11:09 |
Originally posted by RajputGirl
I believe Indians should be classed as africans
If that happened, Pakistanis would be PWNED.
You know how Pakistani school-boys desperately try to emulate stereotypical African-American culture, so they would immediately worship Indians since Indians would be considered black and Pakistanis would still be looked at as curry munchers that own 7'11's.
|
You have an unhealthy obsession with Pakistanis. The guy Raksh or whatever isnt even Pakistani..isnt this obvious from the flag of his avatar. Just because someone says something you consider to be derogatory (and most of the world wonders why you consider it to be derogatory), does not mean they are Pakistani!
Do grow up!
Edited by TeldeInduz - 27-Nov-2006 at 11:15
|
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
|
|
explorer6
Janissary
Joined: 03-Nov-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Nov-2006 at 15:21 |
Many Indians "wannabe" Caucasoids, but most are no closer in molecular DNA to Europeans than they are to Chinese.
Voice of the Ancestors
|
|
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Nov-2006 at 21:42 |
Originally posted by maqsad
I have heard that the latest theory is that Indians were the first mass migration out of africa. This tribe went over the Arabian Peninsula and then down to the subcontinent where it multiplied massively and established deep roots. Now from this point on the migratory stream continued from India into south and north -east asia. The northerners met up and joined with another migration going further north now known as mongoloids and also crossed into Norther America over the Aleutian islands which were walkable back then 15,000 years ago. The southerners became the southeast asians, polynesians malays and austroloids.
There were a couple of other migrations out of africa too, one of them mixed with the remnants of the "desi" migrations in the Iranian Plateu and formed the begining of the Caucasus Asian aka Cauc-asian aka europids. The Europids moved northwest into Europe.
Now there were also obviously tribes that moved BACK further into africa. These would be the Africans.
According to this figure southern indians are austroloids, or polynesian types perhaps. I wonder what DNA testing would produce. Really extensive testing that is, not the handfuls of samples they have taken so far.
Note also that these arrows represent migratory journeys, between these paths obviously interbreeding and hybredization has also taken place. And I believe there should also be some reverse arrows representing back migration too which appear to be missing.
|
This theory is the best explanation for the Indian History, religion, society & the Mythology.
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
|
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Nov-2006 at 21:44 |
We Indians are not caucasoid or european. The AIT is a colonial fallacy which has been proved wrong.
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
|
Omar al Hashim
King
Suspended
Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Nov-2006 at 23:35 |
Originally posted by RajputGirl
If that happened, Pakistanis would be PWNED.
You know how Pakistani school-boys desperately try to emulate
stereotypical African-American culture, so they would immediately
worship Indians since Indians would be considered black and Pakistanis
would still be looked at as curry munchers that own 7'11's. |
Ms RajputGirl, this post violates several parts of AEs code of conduct
including and especially Trolling. This is an informal warning.
|
|
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Nov-2006 at 23:54 |
What exactly is trolling Omar ? What all is included in it's definition? I find many other examples of trolling which seem to not have been noticed.
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
|
Omar al Hashim
King
Suspended
Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-Nov-2006 at 00:19 |
The Code of Conduct is here: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6512
The definition of trolling is under Inappropriate posting.
If you consider something to be trolling that hasn't been noticed it may be a good idea to point it out to a mod.
|
|
M. Nachiappan
Consul
suspended
Joined: 09-Jun-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 315
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Dec-2006 at 01:46 |
If racially interpreted, how would be the position after "miscege
nation"?
|
|
maqsad
General
Joined: 25-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 928
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Dec-2006 at 11:34 |
Originally posted by Vivek Sharma
This theory is the best explanation for the Indian History, religion, society & the Mythology.
|
How so? Elaborate.
|
|
M. Nachiappan
Consul
suspended
Joined: 09-Jun-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 315
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Dec-2006 at 04:39 |
According the Puranas (The Oldest Hostorical Narratives), after the Mahabharat War (The Great War), in which many ancient nations participated, the nations and the respective people were scattered, dispersed and settled in different directions.
Incidentally, the even coincides with the following:
1. A planetary conjunction occurred at c.3102 BCE.
2. Starting of Kaliyuga / era.
3. Submergennce of Dwaraka.
4. The leaving earthly coil of Sri Krishna, the Emporor of Dwaraka.
|
|
maqsad
General
Joined: 25-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 928
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Dec-2006 at 11:28 |
Originally posted by M. Nachiappan
1. A planetary conjunction occurred at c.3102 BCE.
|
What is the significance of this "conjunction" and what references are there that mention and describe this conjunction?
|
|
M. Nachiappan
Consul
suspended
Joined: 09-Jun-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 315
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Dec-2006 at 02:49 |
Waerden, Bartel L. van der: The Conjunction of 3102 B.C., Centaurus 24 (1980), pp.117-131, wherein he deals with the issue of "conjunction" - all planets coming together on 17th / 18th February 3102 BCE and observed by man.
Kindly go through and discuss.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 30-Dec-2006 at 12:46 |
There are only a couple of pure races on this planet one being the aboriginals.There was a very good programme about race on the bbc called "who do you think you are" where by using dna testing they trace you family.
|
|