Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Documents Show US Army Seized Wives As Tactic

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
TeldeIndus View Drop Down
Earl
Earl
Avatar

Joined: 04-Jan-2006
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 258
  Quote TeldeIndus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Documents Show US Army Seized Wives As Tactic
    Posted: 28-Jan-2006 at 20:30
Originally posted by Anujkhamar

Originally posted by Byzantine Emperor

Holding wives for ransom and not torturing them is a good deal more civilized than sawing innocents' heads off on TV in the name of Allah and blowing women and children up in cafes.  And no, Leonidas, it won't lead to America adopting the terrorists' tactics, sorry to ruin your hopes!

i get where your coming from, just thought that it might as well be stated that they don't exactly "saw" off the heads, as that would be haram. It should just be a clean swipe, otherwise its the duty of every other muslim to declare a jihad on the killer (along those lines.....)

 

We are not without accomplishment. We have managed to distribute poverty - Nguyen Co Thatch, Vietnamese foreign minister
Back to Top
Leonidas View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
  Quote Leonidas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Jan-2006 at 20:35
Byzantine Emperor wrote:
"And no, Leonidas, it won't lead to America adopting the terrorists' tactics, sorry to ruin your hopes!"
my point is you have already started adopting them.

"Holding wives for ransom and not torturing them is a good deal more civilized than sawing innocents' heads off on TV in the name of Allah and blowing women and children up in cafes"
So holding wives for ransom is civilised then?

USA  fights with less rules than smaller 'weaker' powers, what a shame you cant be a moral leader aswell as a military leader. As for "not torturing", well i think we have all seen pictures what your brave soldiers are capabale of.

You will leave iraq with you tails between your legs and the smart americans are goin to try and forget it ever happened . The self rightious blind will always call it a victory but blame the politics of it all.


Back to Top
Byzantine Emperor View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Kastrophylax kai Tzaousios

Joined: 24-May-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1800
  Quote Byzantine Emperor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Jan-2006 at 21:04

Originally posted by Kalevipoeg

You created the bloody "terrorist freedom fighters" and wine how you have to use dirty tactics towards them or they won't go away, boohoo. If you can't fight fair as the leading democracy on the Globe, then stay home the next time you plan attacking random countries. Leave the blooy women alone atleast.

Talk about "boo-hooing" because holding wives for ransom is adopted as a tactic, it sure is a lot less violent and unfair as compared to what the "freedom fighters" are doing.  If you think the terrorists are such good fighters, I would maintain that they are not.  Their rag-tag banditry, suicide bombings, and random beheadings would probably make the great Muslim military men of history (Saladin, Mehmed II, etc.) condemn them and say that it is no wonder that the glory days of the Muslim world are long gone. 

Do you really think that the most powerful fighting force on the planet (that of America) would really be losing anything to the terrorists if all its actions weren't hamstrung by the leftist media, rogue lawyer groups (ACLU), and Democratic sob-sisters in Congress?  I sure don't.

Originally posted by Leonidas

USA  fights with less rules than smaller 'weaker' powers, what a shame you cant be a moral leader aswell as a military leader. As for "not torturing", well i think we have all seen pictures what your brave soldiers are capabale of.

You will leave iraq with you tails between your legs and the smart americans are goin to try and forget it ever happened . The self rightious blind will always call it a victory but blame the politics of it all.

Well, when the rogue nations and Hitlerite leaders in the world start nuking and destroying the sophisticated European democracies, if there is anyone left, they will surely be whining and crying to America to beat the upstarts back into submission.

Back to Top
Mila View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 17-Sep-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4030
  Quote Mila Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Jan-2006 at 21:07
Originally posted by Byzantine Emperor

Their rag-tag banditry, suicide bombings, and random beheadings would probably make the great Muslim military men of history (Saladin, Mehmed II, etc.) condemn them and say that it is no wonder that the glory days of the Muslim world are long gone.


Brilliant! I'd have stopped at "condemn them", but that's fine. You get the "Byzantine Allowance" for a jab or two.

But brilliant means of condemning terrorism. I'll be using that.
[IMG]http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/9259/1xw2.jpg">
Back to Top
Leonidas View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
  Quote Leonidas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Jan-2006 at 22:20
Byzantine Emperor wrote:
"Talk about "boo-hooing" because holding wives for ransom is adopted as a tactic, it sure is a lot less violent and unfair as compared to what the "freedom fighters" are doing. "
Yeah right, there wouldnt be any freedom fighters if you werent there in the first place, you created the mess, it wasnt there waiting for you.

"Do you really think that the most powerful fighting force on the planet (that of America) would really be losing anything to the terrorists if all its actions weren't hamstrung by the leftist media, rogue lawyer groups (ACLU), and Democratic sob-sisters in Congress?  I sure don't"
Dam that media! and real men dont cry..What your talking about, is using the unrestraint tactics the russians used in chechenia. Yes it would help you win the false war in iraq with such methods, but there wont be much left. You could win, by destroying the very country your suppose to be 'liberating'. Thankyou  USA for world 'leadership' and global liberation!.

"Well, when the rogue nations and Hitlerite leaders in the world start nuking and destroying the sophisticated European democracies"
former USA allies and regimes built up and supported by short sighted USA policies. Build them up when it suites you, and knock them down when they misbhave or get too strong. Good plan, atleast someone is making a profit on the way up and on the way down.

" if there is anyone left, they will surely be whining and crying to America to beat the upstarts back into submission."
here we can see a great attitude "beat the upstarts back into submission", trust me that line of thinking can lose a war

How convenient for you to mix up the local forces who are fighting a rather effective guerrilla war with fundamentalist who dont give a sh*t about the local people. You point to the worst of them and say hey we are better than that. You then ignore why many local people, who had nothing to do with 9/11 or who were never a threat to the USA, are now fighting your forces. Look at how your ignoring or excusing what your forces have done and how they have behaved, in their country. Why are you over there agian?

Back to Top
Byzantine Emperor View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Kastrophylax kai Tzaousios

Joined: 24-May-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1800
  Quote Byzantine Emperor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Jan-2006 at 22:36

Originally posted by Leonidas

Why are you over there agian?

Glossing over your CNNesque editorial (you should be Wolf Blitzer's co-anchor), I will proceed to the final line.  I really am not sure why American troops are in Iraq anymore.  Quite frankly, I think the focus should be on Afghanistan or wherever bin Laden is supposed to be.  Although I do believe Saddam was an evil dictator and deserved to be overthrown, we should have concentrated on the perpetrators of 9/11 with military force.  I was never bought and sold on the Iraq war and I do feel that it is going terribly.  I do not stick up for Bush in this; however, I will stick up for the American troops.  We are there, it is a mess, and I feel sorry for them and their families.

Back to Top
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Jan-2006 at 00:12
Originally posted by Byzantine Emperor

Do you really think that the most powerful fighting force on the planet (that of America) would really be losing anything to the terrorists if all its actions weren't hamstrung by the leftist media, rogue lawyer groups (ACLU), and Democratic sob-sisters in Congress?  I sure don't.


The most Powerful fighting force on the planet? You mean China, no I suppose you can't they have no Congress. India then, they have a Congress Party, but no, pakistan is as strong as India. Do you mean russia? or Israel?
Oh wait! you mean America. But they aren't strong at all.
Firstly, they haven't won a war in 50 years.
Secondly, They have only won one war against a equal opponent in 200 years.
Should I list the strength of the US army?
Unassited Victories:
Japan
Mexico
Ignoring the miget countries.

Defeats (often assisted):
Vietnam
Lebanon
Somalia
Korea (well Draw, but only to the brillance of Inchon)
Canada (Lets not forget October 13 1814)
Soon to be Iraq, and Afghanistan as well.

Originally posted by Byzantine Emperor


Glossing over your CNNesque editorial

I'm sorry, you think CNN is left wing? You are so far out of touch with the world you may as well be living on mars.

Originally posted by Byzantine Emperor


I think the focus should be on Afghanistan

"Afghanistan is where super powers go to die" - George Tenet (correct spelling?)
If you can't beat Iraq, the Afghans will humilate you. Right now america has very few troops in Afghanistan and it is still taking more casulties per capita than in Iraq.
Back to Top
Leonidas View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
  Quote Leonidas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Jan-2006 at 01:46
Byzantine Emperor wrote:
"Glossing over your CNNesque editorial (you should be Wolf Blitzer's co-anchor), I will proceed to the final line"
You are giving your media way to much credit.

The debate in your media generally follows your governments rational. The boundaries have never been extended to are we right or wrong rather than how long should we stay in
Iraq, or have we contributed to terrorism with our behavoiur/policies  rather than how we can fight terrorism better. The subtle moving and limiting of the boundaries of the US media debate means the debate is won no matter what the outcome is. Your media and the western media are all party to this consensus building appraoch.

" I really am not sure why American troops are in
Iraq anymore."
To find weapons of mass destruction, they didnt. To find a connection with Osama they didnt, but hell they sure opened it up for him. Theve destroyed the security, infrastructure and standard of living, cant get out without replacing what the destroyed.Yet many americans are complety suprised that most Iraqi's dont want them there.

"I do not stick up for Bush in this; however, I will stick up for the American troops.  We are there, it is a mess, and I feel sorry for them and their families."
Yet you follow his logic, and his logic put your troops in harms way. When a
US soldier dies; he dies becuase the republican hawks put him in range of the islamic bullet with no clear advantage or game plan to be fought for. What else can you expect if your trrops are on someone else's land uninvited. It is not becuase Iraqi's are 'terrorist' or 'upstarts' that dont know their place. That is just a misguided and flawed argument.

Edited by Leonidas
Back to Top
Byzantine Emperor View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Kastrophylax kai Tzaousios

Joined: 24-May-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1800
  Quote Byzantine Emperor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Jan-2006 at 22:10

Originally posted by Leonidas

Yet you follow his logic, and his logic put your troops in harms way. When a US soldier dies; he dies becuase the republican hawks put him in range of the islamic bullet with no clear advantage or game plan to be fought for. What else can you expect if your trrops are on someone else's land uninvited. It is not becuase Iraqi's are 'terrorist' or 'upstarts' that dont know their place. That is just a misguided and flawed argument.

Well of course George Bush sent the troops to Iraq; I am not denying something as obvious as that.  They didn't just pick up and go there out of their own volition.  Apart from who sent them there, I will still stand up for the troops and my sympathy is with them, not the President and not the "warhawk" Republicans (I think these so-called Republicans are too much of pansies to be called warhawks).

Back to Top
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Jan-2006 at 02:19
I think that the best way to support the troops is to bring them back to america and save their lives and the lives of the Iraqis
Back to Top
Leonidas View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
  Quote Leonidas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Jan-2006 at 04:04
my point exactly
Back to Top
Genghis View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2656
  Quote Genghis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Jan-2006 at 12:01
That's a terrible idea, it would just create another Afghanistan, and invite military adventurism by Iran.  Even if you disagree with the war, I'd hope you'd be able to see that leaving Iraq broken and unfinished would be catastrophic. 
Member of IAEA
Back to Top
Yiannis View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2329
  Quote Yiannis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Jan-2006 at 12:42

Originally posted by Genghis

leaving Iraq broken and unfinished would be catastrophic. 

I tend to agree with that, but I'm utterly unconvinced that the US current administration is able to do so!

There should be legal consequesnes to those who started this ridiculus war. And I mean both Bush and Blair, apart for Sadam Hussein.

 

 

The basis of a democratic state is liberty. Aristotle, Politics

Those that can give up essential liberty to obtain a temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
Back to Top
Mortaza View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 21-Jul-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3711
  Quote Mortaza Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Jan-2006 at 13:55
 dont understand...whats the problem?

 

The KGB once kid-naped the family members of terrorists, killed them, and sent the terrorists the body parts. As a result, kidnaped Soviet citizens were released (this happened in lebanon). I'm not saying thats right (in fact I"ll say itm it's pretty sick) but its a proven method to go after their familys.

If we dont harm them I dont see the problem. In their minds we would harm their family and thats what counts.

well most disgusting thing about this is that, 

 most  probably after 2 years,  americans will make a film shows that an american woman  kill 2352345324 terrorist by herself, and  show world how big heroes she is.

I  wish easy war for USA army against house-wife, it is realy difficult job for might american armies, good luck.

Disgusting asholes.  cant take their man, but attack woman and childs. Errrr. sorry brave and good  american soldiers.

Democracy? human right? I think, no american accept this type of human rights and  democracy in his country, but well np for iraqians.

I hope none  of you is enough stupid, USA army take this women, and only feed them.

 

Well, when the rogue nations and Hitlerite leaders in the world start nuking and destroying the sophisticated European democracies, if there is anyone left, they will surely be whining and crying to America to beat the upstarts back into submission.

Rogue nation? you mean usa? by the way, your nation is only nation nuked.

 

 

 

Back to Top
morticia View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Retired AE Editor

Joined: 09-Aug-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2077
  Quote morticia Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Jan-2006 at 15:57
Originally posted by Byzantine Emperor

Oh yeah, I knew this topic would be a liberal love-fest as soon as I saw it! Everyone line up and take your pot-shot at America and don't forget to say that the American military is worse than the "resistance fighters" (terrorists)! /sarcasm


Holding wives for ransom and not torturing them is a good deal more civilized than sawing innocents' heads off on TV in the name of Allah and blowing women and children up in cafes. And no, Leonidas, it won't lead to America adopting the terrorists' tactics, sorry to ruin your hopes!



I agree that it's a whole lot better than public beheadings and suicide bombings! Besides, that's a tactic used in the U.S. as well. I have several criminal attorney colleagues who say in most drug related cases, the wives are taken into custody as well in order to get the accused husbands to fully cooperated in exchange for the wife's release. Even in some of those cases, the accused husband does not cooperate and the wives ultimately testify against the husbands in exchange for a lighter sentence. But, at least their "heads" are still attached to their bodies!


Edited by morticia
"Morty

Trust in God: She will provide." -- Emmeline Pankhurst
Back to Top
Byzantine Emperor View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Kastrophylax kai Tzaousios

Joined: 24-May-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1800
  Quote Byzantine Emperor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Jan-2006 at 21:42
Originally posted by Mortaza

well most disgusting thing about this is that, 

 most  probably after 2 years,  americans will make a film shows that an american woman  kill 2352345324 terrorist by herself, and  show world how big heroes she is.

I  wish easy war for USA army against house-wife, it is realy difficult job for might american armies, good luck.

Disgusting asholes.  cant take their man, but attack woman and childs. Errrr. sorry brave and good  american soldiers.

Democracy? human right? I think, no american accept this type of human rights and  democracy in his country, but well np for iraqians.

Rogue nation? you mean usa? by the way, your nation is only nation nuked.

 Wow.

Originally posted by morticia

I agree that it's a whole lot better than public beheadings and suicide bombings! Besides, that's a tactic used in the U.S. as well. I have several criminal attorney colleagues who say in most drug related cases, the wives are taken into custody as well in order to get the accused husbands to fully cooperated in exchange for the wife's release. Even in some of those cases, the accused husband does not cooperate and the wives ultimately testify against the husbands in exchange for a lighter sentence. But, at least their "heads" are still attached to their bodies!

Yes, very good point.  Obviously the other people in here do not understand this!

Back to Top
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Jan-2006 at 21:58
Originally posted by Genghis

That's a terrible idea, it would just create another Afghanistan, and invite military adventurism by Iran.  Even if you disagree with the war, I'd hope you'd be able to see that leaving Iraq broken and unfinished would be catastrophic. 


As catastrophic as an american occupation? I doubt it. The sooner america has a embarrising retreat the better.

Originally posted by MORTICIA


I agree that it's a whole lot better than public beheadings and suicide bombings!

I don't. And are we taking about the suidcide bombings, of which a predominate amount are fabricated or the ones that British SAS (no doubt CIA as well) plant to create divisions in Iraq (remember the incident when britian stormed the prision). And the beheadings, that apparently occur on american news more frequently than anywhere else?
Please try not to get sucked in by Bushes propaganda machine
Back to Top
Byzantine Emperor View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Kastrophylax kai Tzaousios

Joined: 24-May-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1800
  Quote Byzantine Emperor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Jan-2006 at 22:08

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

I don't. And are we taking about the suidcide bombings, of which a predominate amount are fabricated or the ones that British SAS (no doubt CIA as well) plant to create divisions in Iraq (remember the incident when britian stormed the prision). And the beheadings, that apparently occur on american news more frequently than anywhere else?
Please try not to get sucked in by Bushes propaganda machine

If this entire statement isn't a load of propaganda, what is?  Correct me if I am wrong, but I was under the impression that the Arabic news network al-Jazeera regularly airs the beheading videos and uses them as anti-American/anti-Western World propaganda?

Back to Top
Genghis View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2656
  Quote Genghis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Jan-2006 at 22:23

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim


As catastrophic as an american occupation? I doubt it. The sooner america has a embarrising retreat the better.


That's a completely unreasonable argument which prevents anyone from refuting it with a reasonable response.

Member of IAEA
Back to Top
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Jan-2006 at 22:42
Originally posted by Genghis

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim


As catastrophic as an american occupation? I doubt it. The sooner america has a embarrising retreat the better.


That's a completely unreasonable argument which prevents anyone from refuting it with a reasonable response.


Yes thats probably true.
I consider that an american occupation to be worse than what would happen if america suddenly pulled out for the following reasons.
America is a firepower heavy army. In order to reduce the number of american casulties they usually go into a situation with emoumous firepower, inflicting a huge amount of damage and death on the area on or around their target. If insurgents are shooting from a house, destroy the house etc. Also american weapons are Depleted Uranium. Which means they will leave radioactive waste behind every time they are used.
Many areas of Iraq are already autonomous after having signed treatys with america (in the case of Moktadar I think) or not being important enough for america to have a garrison there. The areas where americans are, are already in complete chaos, I don't believe that a withdrawl of america troops could create more chaos.


Edited by Omar al Hashim
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.096 seconds.