Best leader of a Muslim country at present?

Seems you have run out of excuses except to get into sheer technicalities of GENERAL VS "BRIGADIER" General instead of the FACT that Pakistani generals and goons were being transported out of the frontlines back to Pakistan.

Thats fine if you want to go the cowardly way and just give up thats up to you, but you're not fooling anybody with your "Pakistan is 'brotherly' nation" that 'never interfered in Afghan affairs' nonsense.

The Taliban originated in Afghanistan and Pakistan supported it from the beginning to become a militia to take over the entire nation, but they failed.

They are not made up people Hashim, I thought maybe you are smarter than that!

This is Nek Muhammad.  He joined the Afghan rebels to fight the Soviets in his teens, and later joined the Taliban.  He was a mediator between the Taliban and the Pakistani government but was later assassinated by the US with Pakistani assistance.  Pakistan still denies it had any part with it. 

Abdullah Mehsud is shown here.  He fought with the Taliban and later was captured but released and carried his war in Waziristan where he is still a wanted man after a failed Pakistani rescue attempt of construction workers.  He said he will carry Nek's legacy in resisting the Pakistani military and US influence in the region.

If you pronounce Quran Sharif with mistakening the Qaaf and Kaaf you can change the meaning of a word so it does make a difference.

That is incorrect, Urdu uses Perso-Arabic script with many Persian loan words but the base of the language, as well as the family of languages is more related to Indo-Aryan sanskrit not Western Iranian Farsi.

Baluchistan gave access to the British to invade Afghanistan because they were bribed.  Kashmir was already under occupation by the British, and Punjab was being ruled by Ranjit Singh who came to power thanks to the British who favored him over any other ruler.  The managing of the different provincial zones was different back then as well.

My point is Musharraf is not a legitimate leader for a Muslim country, and Pakistan is a federalist military run state that uses Islam when it wants to, and will turn its back on its own Muslims if it means the survival of the military regime.

Forget how Pakistan is medling in foreign affairs, the Musharaf regime is partially responsible for for the Bajaur massacre, in which 18 civilians were murdered by the US. But seing as Pakistan has 70,000 troops along the Pak/Afghan for US aid, along with the information that the Musharaf regime shares intellegence with the US. It becomes clear that Pakistan may have even aided such barbaric atrocities all for the sake of closer relations witht the US.

The Musharaf regime should have dealt with such event straight away, rather we hear of American senator John McCain saying on CBS TV, that such strikes cannot be ruled out in the future.

And yet Musharaf is quite pleased at the progress of Pak/US relations 

Originally posted by Maju How could Pakistan help Turkey in 1914-20 if Pakistan didn't even exist at all?

Yes, Indian Muslims showed a great sympathy towards Turkish cause, war to survive against imperialism,and sent help even by donating their jewelries etc...But the date is a little wrong, the help is more sent after 1920.

Gandhi also had shown a similar political support in this issue.He had put his fist on the table to support the Turkish cause in the war. You know, even at that time,leaders like Gandhi,Nehru and Jinnah was influential on the Indian folk.

Not sure I agree with you on Gandhi Nehru and Jinnah, though I could be wrong. Gandhi just wanted to enlist Muslim support for his own cause and so sided with the Khalifat movement. 

"To enlist Muslim support in his movement, Gandhi supported the Khilafat cause and became a member of the Central Khilafat Committee. "

"Soon after Gandhi called off the Non-cooperation movement, leaving Khilafat leaders with a feeling of betrayal." 

http://library.thinkquest.org/04oct/01368/web/text/independe nce/movements/pg-3.html 

I know what your talking about, however iam simply leading the discusion back to the topic. 'Best Muslim leader'

But the issue is not enlisting Muslim support, it is supporting anti-imperialist struggle of Turks politically from the heart...The Muslims did that both financially and politically, Gandhi did that just politically.

I see. But it seems that Gandhi was more interested in enlisting Muslim support to his Congress so that he could gain more political power for himself - suggesting it was not any princpled stand or fist on the table for the Ottoman caliphate that made him join the Khalifate committee.

Dear i would like to know if it is right that the header says muslim ruler or not because i don't know what have Mr. Erdogan done for islam but to take off the scarfs of our muslim sisters studying in schools, colleges and universities.

so please clearify it what is that he has done for Islam not for Turkey.