Joined: 04-Nov-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 23
QuoteReplyTopic: Allied war crimes during World War II Posted: 13-Mar-2017 at 13:52
The greatest war crime of WW II were the war crime tribunals. War is state sanctioned killing. The object of conducting war is to win. If you can win by intimidation, killing no one fantastic. If necessary you exterminate your opponents entirely. Hopefully something less will suffice.
When the fighting ends, the winner decides what punishment to administer or what revenge to exact.
In WW I, the German military which had introduced gas warfare, was appalled to discover that US Marines were using shotguns against their personnel.
In WW II the British who were appalled that the Luftwaffe could stoop to bomb innocent civilians in cities on their part exclusively bombed cities at night when there could not possibly be any accurate sighting on their bombs.
If you look back in history the black flag was a tried and tested acceptable form of behavior. Any besieged city which failed to capitulate when the wall was breached was subject to mass rape, extermination of every person, theft on a grand scale.
If you want to point that in the 20th century nations had signed Accords which stipulated which forms of warfare were or were not acceptable, and in fact under the League of Nations had completely outlawed war to solve disputes. Question? If war is outlawed and some nations breaks that law, how is that nation to be punished other than other nation(s) prosecuting war against them? CATCH 22. Even ignoring this conundrum, consider that when a war is concluded it will be the victor(s) who determine who has violated the law.
Consider if the League of Nations had been formed prior to WWI. When Germany had been forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles, accepting war guilt; what if they had appealed to the League and the League had voided the treaty and its onerous reparations. What if the League had rightly judged that Germany was no more responsible for the war than Austria Hungary, Serbia, Russsia, Britain, or France. Do have any inkling of a thought that the victorious Allies would have acceded to the verdict?
In fact it is only in the 20th Century that the concept of war crimes was allowed to take form. And oddly enough it is the rise of democracy which is at fault. Prior to that century wars were primarily between opposing monarch and in Europe given the pattern of monarchial in-breeding were essentially family affairs. Had not democracy interposed WW I probably could have been resolved with much less bloodshed and far sooner.
However once warfare became a matter of one nation state versus another; one people against another, and modern warfare requiring enormous armies, war became personal. Individual people (voters) became vested in the outcome of the war. The enormous bloodletting required that somebody had to be held responsible, ie, the concept of war crimes/criminals.
I did withdraw from this thread and this will be my last word.
I have to respect your decision, allthough I don't know, why nobody is willing to speak about it. The only thing people from former countries do here is to point out, that the Germans were worse.
Originally posted by red clay
Dad was in the South Pacific, not Europe. He saw things done to civilian populations as well as US military, by the Japanese, that he can't speak of even today. His LST took a near miss by the stern which bent the screws, making it impossible for the ship to leave the beach after they had unloaded. Dads duty station was the forward gun director. The area directly in front of him was where the dead marines were laid out to be removed as time allowed. He and others had to look at that for 5 days. Those guys knew exactly what was going on, and I don't believe they, at that time, gave a crap.
That Japanese were brutal is not refused by me. That does not change the fact, that the allies excessively killed Japanese POWs.
Originally posted by red clay
The Nazis declared war on the US, The Japanese attacked without warning and then declared war.
The general attitude of most vets toward what you've spoken of is like that of the dropping of the A Bomb, No Pearl Harbor, No Hiroshima.
Simplistic, yes, in some cases racist, yes. But again, you cannot judge anything that happened in that war by the values we hold today.
I said it already. To judge is something different. And BTW, people judge Germans. Why are they allowed to judge them? But as I said, it is not about judging, its about accounting for the past, it is about the myth of clean allied armies. It is about discovering history and explaining why what happened. One cannot discuss and explain allied crimes (and not axis crimes) if one says, "such things happen, the german were worse, I dont want to talk about it"
Originally posted by red clay
I do find it interesting that the folks who initiate total and unrestricted warfare are always the first to cry foul when the same is visited upon them. [And Beorna, that is not directed at you personally]
That may be your impression. My impression is, that people from former allied countries want to hide behind German crimes, so that they do not face there own responsibility or guilt.
Originally posted by red clay
I could very easily compile a list like yours, It would be about a hundred times longer and would start with the Malmedy [Spelling?] Massacre. It would serve no purpose save that of underlining the insanity of the war.
Of course would a german list be even longer. We are guilty of the murder of millions. So why are you not willing to accept the responsibility and guilt for a few hundreds of thousands? If you want to speak about German crimes, too, let's open another thread and talk about axis crimes as well. I will not hide.
Originally posted by red clay
A final thought- This subject could be hashed and rehashed forever. I feel it shows a complete disrespect for the thousands of white crosses from both sides. Men from both the Axis and Allies who, shall remain forever young.
To discover the truth, to try to explain why crimes happened is not disrespect.
red clay, maybe you don't participate, but perhaps you are still reading. If you would take a look into Beevor's D-Day, you can find an story, when on an LST the wounded allied soldiers tried to kill german POWs. Only medic corpsmen could avoid a massacre. But there are meanwhile a lot of stories known, where it happened. So even members of LST's could have known, what had happened.
I did withdraw from this thread and this will be my last word.
Dad was in the South Pacific, not Europe. He saw things done to civilian populations as well as US military, by the Japanese, that he can't speak of even today. His LST took a near miss by the stern which bent the screws, making it impossible for the ship to leave the beach after they had unloaded. Dads duty station was the forward gun director. The area directly in front of him was where the dead marines were laid out to be removed as time allowed. He and others had to look at that for 5 days. Those guys knew exactly what was going on, and I don't believe they, at that time, gave a crap.
The Nazis declared war on the US, The Japanese attacked without warning and then declared war.
The general attitude of most vets toward what you've spoken of is like that of the dropping of the A Bomb, No Pearl Harbor, No Hiroshima.
Simplistic, yes, in some cases racist, yes. But again, you cannot judge anything that happened in that war by the values we hold today.
I do find it interesting that the folks who initiate total and unrestricted warfare are always the first to cry foul when the same is visited upon them. [And Beorna, that is not directed at you personally]
I could very easily compile a list like yours, It would be about a hundred times longer and would start with the Malmedy [Spelling?] Massacre. It would serve no purpose save that of underlining the insanity of the war.
A final thought- This subject could be hashed and rehashed forever. I feel it shows a complete disrespect for the thousands of white crosses from both sides. Men from both the Axis and Allies who, shall remain forever young.
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
red clay, maybe you don't participate, but perhaps you are still reading. If you would take a look into Beevor's D-Day, you can find an story, when on an LST the wounded allied soldiers tried to kill german POWs. Only medic corpsmen could avoid a massacre. But there are meanwhile a lot of stories known, where it happened. So even members of LST's could have known, what had happened.
from Seidler/de zayas, a list of some known war crimes by US units
(1) Charantan, Normandy (14 Jun 1944) A captured NCO named Fanja was killed by a neck shot. (CharantanlNormandie (14. 6. 1944): Der Unteroffizier Fanja wurde nach der Gefangennahme durch Genick schuß getötet.)
(2) Culot, Normandy (Jul 1944): Out of control shooting of captured German soldiers, or shooting out of control German PoWs. (Culot/Normandie (Juli 1944): Erschießung in Gefangenschaft geratener deutscher Soldaten.)
(3) Le Mans
(7 Aug 1944): Multiple shootings of captured SS men from Combat Group
Fick of the 17th SS PanzerGrenadier Division "Goetz von Berlichingen." (Le
Mans (7. B. 1944): Aus der Kampfgruppe Fick der 17.
SS-Pz.-Gren.-Division. „Götz von Berlichingen” wurden mehrere gefangene
SS-Männer erschossen.)
(4) Klein Punach near Metz (20 Sept 1944): Prisoners were called out of a main group and shot in the back. (Klein Punach bei Metz (20. 9. 1944): Gefangene wurden zum Weggehen aufgefordert und in den Rücken geschossen.)
(5) Waldhausen: On 11 Jan 1945 10 captured SS soldiers were shot by the Americans. (Waldhausen (11. 1. 1945): 10 gefangene SS-Soldaten werden von US-Amerikanern erschossen.)
(6) Tiefenbach (Easter Sunday 1945): Three captured Waffen-SS men were shot by Americans. (Tiefenbach (Osterdienstag 1945): Drei Kriegsgefangene der Waffen-SS werden von US-Amerikanern er-schossen.)
(7) Willenbacherhof (10 Apr 1945): Between 10 and 20 wounded German PoWs were shot by the Americans. (Willenbacherhof (10. 4. 1945): 10 bis 20 verwundete und gefangene deutsche Soldaten von US-Amerikanern erschossen.)
(8) Hermersberg: On 11 Apr 1945 a German soldier was strangled to death by an American with a wire garotte and a spade. (Hermersberg (11. 4. 1945): Landser mit Drahtschlingen erdrosselt und mit Spaten von US-Amerikanern totgeschlagen.)
(9) Lampoldshausen (Gemeindefriedhof/ Waldstück Fuchsberg): On 13 Apr 1945 six German POWs were shot by Americans. (Lampoldshausen
(Gemeindefriedhof/ Waldstück Fuchsberg): 13. 4. 1945: Sechs gefangene
deutsche Soldaten von US-Amerikanern erschossen.)
(10) Hermersberg: On 15 Apr 1945 captured SS soldiers were machine-gunned by Americans. (Hermersberg (15. 4. 1945): Gefangene SS-Soldaten werden von hinten mit Maschinengewehren von US-Amerikanern erschossen.)
(11) Harkerode (15 Apr 1945): 16 captured Hitler Youths were shot by Americans in a quarry. (Harkerode (15. April 1945): 16 gefangene Hitlerjungen in einem Steinbruch von US-Amerikanern erschossen.)
(12) Treseburg (18 Apr 1945): 14 hostages, including 11 Hitler Youth, were killed by American neck shots. (Treseburg (18. 4. 1945): 14 Geiseln, darunter 11 Hitlerjungen, durch Genickschüsse durch Amerikaner er-mordet (in Richtung Allrode).)
(13) Lippach near Lauchheim:
On 22 Apr 1945 36 German soldiers who had been captured by the
Americans were killed by neck shots or by having their heads smashed in
("brained"); about 20 women were raped. (Lippach
bei Lauchheim (22. 4. 1945): 36 deutsche Soldaten wurden nach
Gefangennahme von US-Amerikanern durch Genickschuß oder Einschlagen der
Schädel umgebracht; etwa 20 Frauen vergewaltigt.)
(14) Eberstätten in the provincial district of Pfaffenhofen on the Ilm River: On 28 Apr 1945 German PoWs were placed about 50 meters away and then shot "while attempting to escape." (Eberstätten
im Landkreis Pfaffenhofen a. d. Ilm (28. 4. 1945): Deutsche
Kriegsgefangene wurden aus etwa 50 Meter Entfernung „auf der Flucht
erschossen”.)
(15) Tittling (29 Apr 1945) The mayor was arrested and shot. (Tittling (29. 4. 1945): Festnahme und Erschießung des Bürgermeisters.)
(16) Dachau concentration camp:
On 29 Apr 1945 134 members of the guard battalion were executed by
American machine-gun fire and 40 others were killed by prisoners. (KL-Dachau
(29. 4. 1945): 134 Angehörige des Wachsturmbannes durch amerikanisches
MG-Feuer und 40 weitere durch Häftlinge ermordet.)
(17) Dachau concentration camp:
On 29 Apr 1945 346 severely injured patients at the Dachau military
hospital, along with nurses, doctors, kitchen personnel and others were
killed by American machine-gun fire. The SS personnel were not part of
the concentration camp cadre, but belonged to the 5th Training Battalion
of the "Wiking" Division. (KL-Dachau
(29. 4. 1945): 346 Schwer- und Schwerstverwundete des Dachauer
Kriegslazarettes, sowie Schwestern, Arzte, Küchenpersonal u.a. durch
amerikanische MG-Salven ermordet. Die SS-Leute gehörten nicht zu der
Stammannschaft, sondern zum Ausbildungs-Btl. 5 der Division „Wiking”.)
(18) Mauerkirchen-Altheim near Braunau on the Inn River:
On 30 Apr 1945 there was (Ausplünderung -- plunder, pillage,
spoliation, looting, sacking, rape, despoilment, pilferage, scavenging)
of German soldiers. (Mauerkirchen-Altheim bei Braunau/ Inn (30. 4. 1945): Ausplünderung deutscher Soldaten.)
(19) Kleinweil (Großweil postal service): On 30 Apr 1945 two captured German soldiers were shot by the Americans. (Kleinweil (Post Großweil) – 30. 4. 1945: Erschießung von zwei deutschen gefangenen Soldaten durch US-Amerikaner.)
(20) Trassheim near Ruderfing (1 May 1945): US soldiers shot two civilians. (Trassheim bei Ruderfing (1. 5. 1945): US-Soldaten erschießen zwei Zivilisten.)
(21) Oberframmern (1
May 1945): Seven German PoWs were driven to the Dorfstrasse (Dorf
Street or perhaps the main road through the town) and shot by the
Americans. (Oberframmern (1. 5. 1945):
Sieben deutsche Kriegsgefangene wurden von US-Amerikanern durch die
Dorfstraße getrieben und erschossen.)
(22) On the way to Altheim, at the beginning of May 1945, Americans shot German PoWs who were too tired to keep up with the column of prisoners. (Verlegung
nach Altheim (Anfang Mai 1945): US-Amerikaner erschießen deutsche
Gefangene, die aus der Kolonne liefen oder wegen Erschöpfung nicht mehr
weiter konnten.)
B. Undated events:
(1) Erching (at the customs house): A captured German NCO was shot by an American. (Erching (Zollhaus): Gefangener deutscher Unteroffizier wurde von Amerikanern erschossen.)
(2) Herbolzheim: Seven SS soldiers who were captured by the Americans were shot. (Herbolzheim: Sieben SS-Soldaten werden nach Gefangennahme von US-Amerikanern erschossen.)
(3) Kressbach: Six captured SS men were killed by neck shots. (Kressbach: Sechs gefangene SS-Männer durch Genickschuß getötet.)
(4) Neuenbeken field hospital: Two wounded SS soldiers were taken out of their beds and then executed by neck shots. (Feldlazarett Neuenbeken: Zwei verwundete SS-Soldaten wurden aus den Betten geholt und durch Genickschüsse erschossen.)
(5) Nordborchen: A number of captured SS soldiers were shot. (Nordborchen: Erschießung von mehreren gefangenen SS-Soldaten.)
(6) Friedhof von Etteln: 27 captured SS soldiers were killed by neck shots. (Friedhof von Etteln: 27 gefangene SS-Soldaten durch Genickschuß getötet.)
(7) Henglan: Four German prisoners were shot. (Henglan: Erschießung von vier deutschen Gefangenen.)
(8) Paderborn area: Approximately 30 German soldiers and Hitler Youth were shot through the head; a couple of them were tied up. (Raum Paderborn: etwa 30 deutsche Soldaten und Hitlerjungen wurden durch Kopfschüsse getötet (einige starben gefesselt).)
(9) Northwest Upper Harz in the Paderborn area: Approximately 100 captured German soldiers were murdered. (Nordwestlicher Oberharz/Raum Paderborn: Etwa 100 gefangene deutsche Soldaten ermordet.)
(10) Northwest Upper Harz around Osnabrueck: 17 SS soldiers were executed by neck shots. Five dedicated Hitler Youths were hanged by Americans from a tree. (Nordwestlicher
Oberharz/Osnabrück: 17 SS-Soldaten durch Genickschuß umgebracht. Fünf
Hitlerjungen wer-den, nachdem sie sich ergaben, von den US-Amerikanern
an einen Baum gehängt und totgeprügelt.)
(11) Offenhausen near Hersbruck: Three young Waffen-SS PoWs were shot by Americans. (Offenhausen bei Hersbruck: Drei gefangene junge Soldaten der Waffen-SS wurden von US-Amerikanern erschossen.)
(12) Waschbach near Bad Mergentheim: Drunken Americans raped women and young girls. (Waschbach bei Bad Mergentheim: Betrunkene US-Amerikaner vergewaltigen Frauen und Mädchen.)
(13) Pfaffenhofen: Americans shot 17 captured German soldiers. (Pfaffenhofen: US-Amerikaner erschießen 17 gefangene deutsche Soldaten.)
(14) North of Dachau – Webling: A number of captured German soldiers from Battle Group Truchsess were shot. (Nördlich von Dachau – Webling: mehrere gefangene deutsche Soldaten der Kampfgruppe von Truchseß wurden erschossen.)
(15) Eggstätt near Endorf: Americans shot two German soldiers, after making them dig their own graves. (Eggstätt bei Endorf: US-Amerikaner erschießen zwei Soldaten, die vorher ihre Grablöcher schaufeln mußten.)
(16) Atenau: American troops shot all German soldiers who were trying to surrender. (Atenau: US-Amerikaner erschießen alle Soldaten, die sich vorher ergeben hatten.)
(17) Hengersberg(?): Americans shot the mayor, his wife, two schoolchildren and a "Zufallszeugen." (Hengersberg(?):
Erschießung des Bürgermeisters, seiner Frau, zwei schulpflichtigen
Kindern und eines Zufallszeugen durch die Amis.)
(18) In the hamlet of Zell, 18 captured anti-aircraft troops were murdered by neck shots. (Ortschaft Zell: 18 Flaksoldaten wurden nach Gefangennahme durch Genickschuß ermordet.)
"This study contends that American soldiers killed large numbers
of Axis POWs during the war in Europe. Although the established
rules of war did not completely break down as in the Pacific
theater, the killing of POWs was an integral part of the American
combat ethos because the desensitizing effects of total warfare
produced a mental state conducive to the abandonment of the
established rules of war. Any enemy soldier who knowingly, or
unknowingly, violated the American perception of proper battlefield
behavior often met with a fatal response. Moreover, American
soldiers whose mental state had been significantly distorted by the
brutality of their combat experience often had little compunction
about killing enemy prisoner who did not violate these unwritten
rules."
That is the standard claim: "―It is probable,‖ acting Deputy Theater Judge Advocate Colonel Charles L.
Decker concluded, - that the rumors of shooting PWs were grossly exaggerated, part of
the folklore of the war - isolated incidents having been enormously magnified and
multiplied in the retailing [sic]"
But the truth is "Obviously, Mickelwait and Decker were wrong to assume that such incidents
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
You are boath, right and wrong. Of course you're right, that this is about WWII. But you are wrong if you see no connection. In all those wars the crimes are based on a dehumanisation of the enemy, based on a shift of the frame of refenrence
Originally posted by toyomotor
We must accept that War Crimes were committed by all participants in WWII, but that in the case of the allies, Russians excepted, the level of atrocities was much much less.
I would widely agree here.
Originally posted by toyomotor
Even the Russians did not compete with the level of atrocities committed by Germany.
The numbers are different, not so much the kind of brutality and of course the industrialisation of genocide was something new and unique german in WWII.
Originally posted by toyomotor
Unless anyone can realistically dispute that, I think the thread is finished.
This is not my first discussion about it and even not the first with red clay or mountain man. I had it in some other fora too, we all once joined and some do even today. In all those threads it was the same. Soon me and others who talked about allied war crimes became the revisionists, apologists and at least those who support the nazi crimes. No one ever tried to discuss the points I offered as allied war crimes, about all those historians and their evidence. And the end usually was, that some even stated, they should have killed more. The only real dispute went usually around the allied bombing campaign. I had there hot discussions with redcoat and our dead mate viking about it and we usually disagreed. But that was due to a lack of explicite laws against bombing warfare. So it is not necessary to see aerial bombing of WWII as war crime. I just pointed out my position and they there's. I just was reading the guidelines for a discussion within these section. So I would support you, toyomotor, let us discuss the facts.
We must accept that War Crimes were committed by all participants in WWII, but that in the case of the allies, Russians excepted, the level of atrocities was much much less.
Even the Russians did not compete with the level of atrocities committed by Germany.
Unless anyone can realistically dispute that, I think the thread is finished.
That is nonsense. I cannot judge? It seems people like you have no problem to judge germans. But I can tell you I do not judge about these people. I am even more interested in the reasons why the commit crimes instead of blaming them just to blame them. I am interested why germans murdered, why Russians murdered, why Americans, britons and others murdered and if not, why not. If we ignore crimes like you, we are condemned to repeat these mistakes. The USA have never learned. That's why they committed war crimes in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and now in Afghanistan. That's why some still mutilate Taliban and still take trophies.
You're rebuttal is to feel sorry for the Taliban? Terrorists who murder women and children?
What planet are you from?
THIS is why we don't have discussions on this forum.Too many people who nothing about history but want to comment on it and criticize it.
Do you know what made the nazis so terrible? They thought they are the chosen race, their enemies bugs and that is was not bad to destroy these bugs. The dehumanisation of the enemy caused so many crimes. I neither like the taliban nor do I like Al Qaeda. But it seems you not even know the difference. It were the Mujjahedin you supported during the Soviet-Afghan war, who are today the Taliban. At those days they were called freedom fighters. But now you love to call them terrorist, just because they are on the other side. Your state has as well no problem to work together with states who support terrorism, you even sended supposed taliban or Al Qaeda members to Syria to get tortured. The taliban are a bunch of islamistic fanatics, the Al Qaeda members are cowards. But that doesn't give the USA or other states the right to humiliate their bodys, that doesn't give the USA the right to treat them like they do it in Guantanamo, to torture them or if we look to Abu Ghraid in Iraq to mistreat them sexually. The same racist attitude Americans had against the japanese, do they seem to have as well against Muslims.
All of my post that's in quotations are a direct quote from my Dad, as spoken to me last eve. I suggest you re read the entire post paying attention to the quotations. And no, you can't judge him, he was there, you were not.
As I said, I have no intention to judge him. But if only those who were there can write the history, we would have a lot of wrong history. It would be at all the question, if we need historians, if only those who were there have the right to speak. But in this case your claim, that those who were there tell the truth, which is different to my quotes here. Historians have discovered war diaries, have made interviews and all those give a completely different picture than those of a good herois GI.
Originally posted by red clay
And as for him lieing, Dad says he forgives you.
I can*t see that there is something one has to forgive me.
Originally posted by red clay
"I've been hearing revisionist and apologist BS for years.
The same platitudes, if one has no arguments and does not want to accept fact. Revisionist, apologist and at least nazi. Is that your only argument. I can see that you mention one of my links. I can post some more literature about it.
That is nonsense. I cannot judge? It seems people like you have no problem to judge germans. But I can tell you I do not judge about these people. I am even more interested in the reasons why the commit crimes instead of blaming them just to blame them. I am interested why germans murdered, why Russians murdered, why Americans, britons and others murdered and if not, why not. If we ignore crimes like you, we are condemned to repeat these mistakes. The USA have never learned. That's why they committed war crimes in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and now in Afghanistan. That's why some still mutilate Taliban and still take trophies.
You're rebuttal is to feel sorry for the Taliban? Terrorists who murder women and children?
What planet are you from?
THIS is why we don't have discussions on this forum.Too many people who nothing about history but want to comment on it and criticize it.
All of my post that's in quotations are a direct quote from my Dad, as spoken to me last eve. I suggest you re read the entire post paying attention to the quotations. And no, you can't judge him, he was there, you were not.
And as for him lieing, Dad says he forgives you. "I've been hearing revisionist and apologist BS for years. The truth began to be lost the day the surrenders were signed, and we all had to be "friends" again. As those of us who were there got older, it may be that many had difficulty dealing with the reality of what we had been through. I did not. We didn't start the damn thing, but as overseas duty in the Coast Guard was all volunteer, we chose to be there, and all we wanted to do was finish the job and go home".
Edited by red clay - 11-Feb-2014 at 13:42
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
Still trying to justify what your folks did in WWII, by saying "they did it too". "Your troops murdered innocent prisoners of war" etc. etc. eh Beorna.
I would expect such offense by a troll but not by a mod! Where did I ever justify a single murder by germans? Where? Did you read my links, did you ever care about literature and sources, even presented by scientists from former allied countries? I do not expect, that you read German literature, but at least your own scientists? Do I say german crimes were justified? Did I ever say allied crimes are greater or as great as Germans? Did I ever said allied soldiers are more evil than Germans? The answer is simple, NO, I did not. BUt you seem to close your eyes, just because you don't want to see.
Originally posted by red clay
My Dad is living with us now, He's 93. His amphib squadron was at Leyte and Sabu Island, Iwo Jima, Okinawa, and a dozen small landings. I read your post to him, I'll spare you his word for word response, needless it wasn't very flattering.
I don't know your dad and therefor can't say anything about him. There is a lot of research which verifies allied war crimes in geat style. But maybe all other GI's in such interviews lie. Maybe a lot of war diaries simply lie.
Originally posted by red clay
In part- "The Japs were told to fight and die, taking as many of us with them as possible. They continued to do this even after it was apparent that they had no chance of winning, or even getting a truce. It was blind hatred of the "white devils". To them it was a racial war. As far as our reactions, that's fine. It played right into the hands of the Allies and they became the "Yellow menace".
The Japanese Garrison on Iwo was almost 30,000. There were less than 200 prisoners taken. Were some killed trying to surrender? Yes! When you see men killed by an explosive charge strapped to the body of an enemy who is supposedly surrendering, your attitude changes and your own survival instincts kick in, "if it moves, kill it". That coupled with the fact that every dugout, tunnel and what have you had to be blasted clean, accounted for the low prisoner count.
Anger. Anger over having our lives disrupted, anger over being away from our wives and familys. Anger over the enemy's refusal to quit when there was no hope. Anger over the atrocities the Japanese committed against those whose lands they had captured, and the Allied prisoners they had taken".
Read my link Fergusson and if you read with open eyes you can read exactly about it!
PS: Japs is a racist expression!
Originally posted by red clay
"You who were not there, at that time, cannot judge. You cannot judge on the values and principals held today".
" Some day I will be judged. I have several hundred souls on my tab. I feel no sorrow, no guilt, I sleep well". Red Clay SR, PO. 1stC, USCG. LST 758.
That is nonsense. I cannot judge? It seems people like you have no problem to judge germans. But I can tell you I do not judge about these people. I am even more interested in the reasons why the commit crimes instead of blaming them just to blame them. I am interested why germans murdered, why Russians murdered, why Americans, britons and others murdered and if not, why not. If we ignore crimes like you, we are condemned to repeat these mistakes. The USA have never learned. That's why they committed war crimes in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and now in Afghanistan. That's why some still mutilate Taliban and still take trophies.
Still trying to justify what your folks did in WWII, by saying "they did it too". "Your troops murdered innocent prisoners of war" etc. etc. eh Beorna.
My Dad is living with us now, He's 93. His amphib squadron was at Leyte and Sabu Island, Iwo Jima, Okinawa, and a dozen small landings. I read your post to him, I'll spare you his word for word response, needless it wasn't very flattering.
In part- "The Japs were told to fight and die, taking as many of us with them as possible. They continued to do this even after it was apparent that they had no chance of winning, or even getting a truce. It was blind hatred of the "white devils". To them it was a racial war. As far as our reactions, that's fine. It played right into the hands of the Allies and they became the "Yellow menace".
The Japanese Garrison on Iwo was almost 30,000. There were less than 200 prisoners taken. Were some killed trying to surrender? Yes! When you see men killed by an explosive charge strapped to the body of an enemy who is supposedly surrendering, your attitude changes and your own survival instincts kick in, "if it moves, kill it". That coupled with the fact that every dugout, tunnel and what have you had to be blasted clean, accounted for the low prisoner count.
Anger. Anger over having our lives disrupted, anger over being away from our wives and familys. Anger over the enemy's refusal to quit when there was no hope. Anger over the atrocities the Japanese committed against those whose lands they had captured, and the Allied prisoners they had taken".
"You who were not there, at that time, cannot judge. You cannot judge on the values and principals held today".
" Some day I will be judged. I have several hundred souls on my tab. I feel no sorrow, no guilt, I sleep well". Red Clay SR, PO. 1stC, USCG. LST 758.
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
Toyomotor, First, Calley was pardoned, an act within the power of the executive, not the judiciary. Second, how many years did the perpetrators of the Hue Massacres serve? That's right, they weren't even tried. They were carrying out orders.
Also, one helicopter pilot received the Medal of Honor for trying to stop the My Lai massacre.
Firstly, Calley should never have been pardoned. In his case the Executive was wrong!
The Hue Massacre, carried out by the Viet Cong/NVA, was an atrocity which can not be excused by the fact that they were carrying out orders. Every soldier knows that, in the event of an order being patently unlawful, they have the right to refuse to carry out that order. They should have been tried for committing a War Crime.
I thought the Nuremburg Defence went out the window in 1946!
Yes, I know about the helicopter pilot getting the CMH, and it was well deserved. That man deserves to have his name in lights on every US Base.
Toyomotor, First, Calley was pardoned, an act within the power of the executive, not the judiciary. Second, how many years did the perpetrators of the Hue Massacres serve? That's right, they weren't even tried. They were carrying out orders.
Also, one helicopter pilot received the Medal of Honor for trying to stop the My Lai massacre.
Phong trần mài một lưỡi gươm, Những loài giá áo túi cơm sá gì
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum