Is France trying to cover up its dark past in the classrooms?

most but not all westerners on this site would not deny the crimes of their nations past, it seems on AE its usually the non western nations that are more likely to deny their past.

ALong that same vein France is not doing anything that Japan doesnt do, orIndonesia.  Burundi probably doesnt also teach its children its dirty little paty in Rwandan racial war (the opposite but still just as evil side of the Tutsis) , Madagascar probably doesnt teach about the persecution of Christians in th e1850s-

People dont like their past, in the US we both acknowledge and deny our evils depending ont he issue.  We certainly spend alot of time acknowledging slavery and racism, yet most schools dont tell the full story of westward expansion, and certainly most if not all schools in the US would not mention what we did int he Phillippines against innocent people and of course our Vietnam history is at least somewhat whitewashed.  For example the unpopulararity of the war and the casualties are nto downplayed but the actions both sides took against citizens that was cruel is hardly given a mention.

OK maybe i was unfair in generalising, i was just letting out some anger after reading all the Armenian threads where the conduct of some of the contributors is obviously unobjective. 

maybe i got pissed when reading about how one should be "objective" when we discuss Europeans but when it comes to the Turks everyone is quick to accuse with little or no understanding of what happened.

"In retaining only the positive aspects of colonialism this law imposes an official lie on massacres that at times went as far as genocide on the slave trade, and on the racism that France has inherited," says the petition, which has also been signed by one of France's best-loved humourists, Guy Bedos, and a leading film director, Patrice Ch�reau.

The law of February 23 2005, as it is known, was intended to recognise the contribution of the "harkis", the 200,000 or so Algerians who fought alongside France's colonial troops in their country's war of independence, from 1954-62, before being abandoned to a dreadful fate when the French withdrew - about 130,000 were executed as traitors.

But an unnoticed amendment, apparently tabled by MPs with close ties to France's community of former Algerian settlers, added a new clause to the bill. It reads: "School courses should recognise in particular the positive role of the French presence overseas, notably in north Africa." Opponents are angry in part because, in the words of one eminent historian, Pierre Vidal-Naquet: "It is not up to the state to say how history should be taught."

Mr Vidal-Naquet told Liberation: "In Japan, a law defines the contents of history lessons, and textbooks minimise Japan's responsibility in the Sino-Japanese war. If France wants to be like that, it's going the right way about it."

Other leading historians said the need for such a law might be understandable in Germany but not in France. "It is imposing an official version of history, in defiance of educational neutrality," said one professor, Gerard Noiriel. "I cannot accept the authorities dictating to teachers the contents of their lessons."

But the principal objection to the law is simply that, like most forms of colonialism, the French empire caused great suffering. The anti-racist group MRAP said the law was "an insult to intelligence, a denial of democracy, a rejection of historical reality and a brake on academic freedom". Above all, it showed "contempt for the victims".

Laws governing how certain periods of history should be taught in French schools have been passed before: a 1990 law outlaws denial of the Holocaust, and a 2001 law dictates that the slave trade be described as a crime against humanity. But those episodes are unambiguous.

"The reality of the Holocaust and slave trade is self evident," said Thierry Le Bars, a law professor at Caen University, who has also signed the petition.

"It is by no means self evident that France's colonialism was positive. Think of the ignoble legal status of the Muslims in Algeria, of the massacre of up to 5,000 Algerians in Setif in 1945, of all the unfortunates who endured the hell of slavery to assure the prosperity of Caribbean islands."

The first of France's two empires began in the early 1600s in what are now Nova Scotia and Quebec. Louisiana had been added by the end of the century, as had Caribbean territories including French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique and Saint-Domingue (now Haiti).

At the same time France got a foothold in west Africa (Senegal), and in India. Most of that empire was lost by 1815, but a second began in 1830 with the invasion of Algeria. Southern Vietnam and Cambodia followed, then, after the Franco-Prussian war of 1870-71, the rest of French Indochina, Tunisia and Morocco, and almost all of western and central Africa.

Mr Noiriel said the law was "all the more dangerous" because of attempts by certain interest groups to "confiscate history for their own ends".

He added: "It can only contribute to a feeling of humiliation. It is directly opposed to the policy of integration the government claims to be implementing.