Truth revealed: Negro Egypt is finally..

 

to my discovery in the identity of the afro-asiatic lineage, I concluded that Giza was built before the dynastic Egypt by ancestors of black people. It will be too long to prepare a essay but I will just make it concise:

1--Dating of Giza to 2700BC-2660BC within the dynatsic period is unreliable, due to the board use of calibration standards, which disregard the unique climate of Sahara area that may have impact on the carbon dating results. Giza is at least from 3500BC.

2--The establishment of king Tut as indo-european works against the white Egypt theory, if taking Giza as religious structures(the most likely explanation), those late egyptians were the lest related to the builders of Giza, since dynastic egyptians knew nothing about Giza and its relationship to Osiris. Even they worshiped Osiris yet they knew nothing about Gizas Osirian symbolism.

3--Ancient religious sites are meant to be used only once and then be abandoned forever, this phenomenon is common among the mesoamericans, which built their religious sites during a sprcial period and then abandoned them after the period for which the sites were built. Therefore, the dynastic egyptians were more possible to have been colonizers/invaders rather than those who actually built Giza. Giza itself should be regarded as a non-egyptian structure, and irrelevant to either Luxor or even Memphis. Giza and dynastic Egypt are two different things. Giza may have attracted people to build kingdoms there but they obviously never understand the structure. People who understand the Giza would SHUN them not get close to them, shunning Giza were those african blacks, and guanches, possibly chachapoyas(guanches and chachapoyas mummified their deads too, and they all belong to same race with african blacks)

4--Black africans have a unique genetic lineage Y HG-E, sharing this haplogroup with other indigenous africans like berbers, also guanches and chachapoyas which are not black. The diversity of phenotype under Y HG-E could also mean possible divergence of ancient culture. This possibility includes that a non-black Y HG-E people were the first africans and egyptians and built Giza.

5--Culturally speaking Y HG-E people is unique to Africa and they are the oldest school of civilization in the world, they do not belong to any of western cultural schools: indo-aryan, indo-european, semitic etc. They had their own cultural identity which is afro-asiatic, this cultural was closely related to the most ancient civilizations. If these people were majority in Africa, there is no doubt they created the first monuments of Egyptian civilization, but not alone. Listen below:

6--These people have asiatic connection, notably the mtdna M founda mong the berbers, this is the only population to share mtdna M with east asians and indians outside East Asia and southwestern Asia! The asiatic component is obvious mongoloid,on the otehr hand, genetic also proves that mongoloid people dominated India long before the arrival of western caucasians, the religious legacies of mongoloid people in India, Mesoamerica, China clearly indicate some exclusive religious connection to ancient Egyptian cults, and these connections are not to be found within any of non mongoloid cultures after ancient Egypt.

7--The native tribalistic cultures of Y HG E people(african negroes, guanches, berbers) is more fited into the model of ancient cultic traditions and thus made them more disposed for religious collaboration with the mystic eastern ancient cults. Most indo-aryans and europeans, semites are basically agains the serpentine deities, religiously speaking indo-aryans and semites are both unlikliy to accept the eastern influences. The obvious culture trait of indo-aryans are building palaces, trading and invading, not building pyramids and worshipping the serpents.

8--Y HG E as an independent african ethnic people their ancient culture and eastern cultures had great mutual interests: when their lack of religious connection to ancient Egpt can be explained by the influence from eastern religions, the discrepancy between the way of egyptian cult and the cult of the same serpent deities in East asia can be explained by the interference of such african people. By the notion of afro-asiatic cultural and religious collaboration, the cultural discrepancies between ancient Egypt and african and east asians can be fully clarified, and thus they are the most eligible people to legacy of the highest Egyptian monuments, Giza.

Blacks is E, so are berbers and guanches, this haplogroup is unique, they were not only the earliest western neolithic people also the first one to connect to the east, under the auspice of the eastern influence, they have the most priority to claim Giza, regardlessly to their skin.

 

You know these are simply true:

 

1- YHG-E people dominated pre-dynastic lower Egypt where the pyramids of Giza were built,

 

2- There were a tiny mongoloid population there too according to a genetic test on cemetary, one is O3, dating to 3500BC.

 

3-Lets forget about skin, just remember Y HG-E people was a dominant lineage of the mysterious afro-asiatic school, which predates Indo-aryan, indoeuropean, semitic. Y HG-E were not all blacks, but the belong to the same race by genetics.

 

 

 

Skin color becomes out of question here, I am of opinion that those who built Giza were genetically blacks but however, they maybe look lile berbers, white skinned, strange.