Who was jesus, Prophet?

Jesus took a completely different approach. He announced the new covenant over dinner with some friends, and he didn't say that this was God's covenant between God and man (i.e man being Jesus + his disciples + rest of the earth). He said “This cup is the new covenant between god and his people, an agreement confirmed with my blood, which is poured out as a sacrifice for you. [Luke 22:20] emphasis added)

an agreement confirmed with my blood, which is poured out as a sacrifice for you. This is an odd statement. By this it is clear that jesus blood is a sacrifice poured out (that's a lot of blood!) which confirms the new covenant. Now if jesus' blood/life is a sacrifice, and as he has stated earlier on that this new covenant (the establishment of the kingdom of God of which he talks extensively on- bordering on obsessively in all books of the Goslples) then proves problematic. When god made a covenant with Abraham a sacrifice was made. The condition of sacrifice in the law was that it was perfect, and as jesus said “he came to forfill the law, not destroy it”. He said this because it is impossible to destroy a covenant. You can break it and therefore be unable to recive it's benefits but you can't destoy it. If you break it you're a party of a broken covenant, but the only way god could establish the new covenant promised through the prophets was to get rid of the old contract so he could establish the new one. How does one get completely rid of the old contract? As i said earlier on, god divorces Israel, so to speak. But it is a little more complicated that just that, as he promised to be the god over all of isreal and that he would never leave isreal or abandon them. He says he will separate himself from them is they're disobedient, but he can't just pack up and leave. IF he did he would break his oath, and become a liar, thus becoming unholy.

When he “ends” his covenant of favor with isreal, he finds himself in a bit of a pickle. So, inorder to keep his promises in the old covenant about separating himself from isreal if they sinned and yet keep his promises to Abraham about eternal blessing, the only way to do both is end the old covenant. How does he do that? By forfilling his bit so he does not become a liar.

But the only way a covenant can end is if both parties do what they said they would do. If the children of Israel were to forfill the law, then they would have to be perfect, yes? But scripture is clear that this is impossible “the human hear is desperately and deceitfully wicked. Who can know it?”. So how does one still for fill the law and be done with it? By offering a perfect sacrifice as atonement for sin (breach of contract).

So how does this relate to Jesus? In order to be a sacrifice, he had to be perfect. But according to scripture that is impossible for a man. Scripture says “no man is perfect, there is not even one.”Only god is perfect. So if Jesus was a man, How can he be an acceptable offering for the confirmation of a Covenant? And if there is atonement for sin for all through him (I am the door, I am the way, the truth, the life, no one can come to the Father except through me” (even if you offer animal sacrifices you cannot come to the father in the sense which he interpreted coming to the Father meant)) then how is that possible for a human to release man of a covenant made by god? Is Jesus more powerful than god. The only thing that has dominion over god is himself. So if jesus was like a piece of the divine, therefore his comment at the supper table makes sense. Otherwise he is clamming to be as holy as god, but is infact not, thus becoming a hieratic (the only group of people he ever really condemned).