Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

A battlefield like no Other

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: A battlefield like no Other
    Posted: 14-Apr-2008 at 11:47
Siachin the roof of the world.
 
Back to Top
Al Jassas View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 07-Aug-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1810
  Quote Al Jassas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Apr-2008 at 14:19
Hello Sparten
 
I read about this strange conflict in Time magazine:
 
 
Now these are truely worriors.
 
Al-Jassas
Back to Top
Maharbbal View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 08-Mar-2006
Location: Paris
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2120
  Quote Maharbbal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Apr-2008 at 17:38
These are truly idiots. Not the poor guys on the frontline nor the civilians but the sons of bitches who can't agree on a bloody frontier. Pointless killing.
I am a free donkey!
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Apr-2008 at 17:52
Its a bit more complicated than that. Kashmir has the headworks of all the rivers of S Asia, on whoich this region depends.
Back to Top
Brian J Checco View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
Eli Manning

Joined: 30-Jan-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 925
  Quote Brian J Checco Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Apr-2008 at 17:52
That's a hellish combination of the doctrines of arctic warfare and mountain warfare, pushed the extremes for God only knows what reason. 
My Name is Eli Manning. Ponce owns my soul.
Back to Top
pikeshot1600 View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar


Joined: 22-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4221
  Quote pikeshot1600 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Apr-2008 at 22:12

Sparten may have articulated the reason in regard to the headwaters of the rivers.  There is more here than just some remote conflict that nobody knows about.  The costs alone must justify military operations, and the abandonment of control may result in unfavorable circumstances long term.

Nature and geography don't care about politics.  Control of geographic features and their influence over resources, or potential resources, are often necessary for global or regional supremacy.  It is a human need. 

The effort to control such geography is helped by professional military forces.  It is their job.  Does anyone seriously believe the large, and very expensive, US presence in the Gulf/Iraq has to do with anything other than influence over the only resource there that is important?
 
 
Back to Top
Paul View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
AE Immoderator

Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
  Quote Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Apr-2008 at 23:17
But 21st century and India and Pakistan still behaving like it's the dark ages.
 
What relevance do borders even have in the age of global corperations.
 
Shame on India, who at least should know better.
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Apr-2008 at 05:59
Originally posted by Paul

But 21st century and India and Pakistan still behaving like it's the dark ages.
 
What relevance do borders even have in the age of global corperations.
 
Shame on India, who at least should know better.
 
Why should India know better. Its they who attempted to occpy the glacier in the first place?
 
 
Anyway, those glaciers feed the rivers that sustain the population, agriculture and industry. If they other guy controls them you are dead. Its also the route to China,the Karakorum Highway passes only a few kms from the posts shown in the video.
 
Shame on Paul who should at least know better. LOLWink
Back to Top
Maharbbal View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 08-Mar-2006
Location: Paris
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2120
  Quote Maharbbal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Apr-2008 at 17:08
I think Paul's right (gosh I need to see a doctor urgently).

Ultimately, who gives a shit about a bloody road and a handful of bloody rivers? It is not the Middle Age anymore when controlling a pass was essential for the fiscal survival of a state. If it was still the case Switzerland would rule Europe

Now resources are important, but international treaty are designed to regulate their use for every one to benefit from them. Israel itself is getting ready to retreat from Golan despite decades of speeches about how strategically important it was.

What are the Indians gonna do anyway? Prevent the ice from melting during the summer? Build a dam on the K2?
I am a free donkey!
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Apr-2008 at 17:41
Build a dam on the Indus.
Back to Top
Al Jassas View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 07-Aug-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1810
  Quote Al Jassas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Apr-2008 at 18:04
Israel will retreat after it guarantees it controls the flow of the river ( and of course assumes full control on the lake) and it allocates to quotas like the Yarmouk river which though rises from Jordan Israel gives the Jordanias the water not the other way around. Israel even controls the water on the west bank and Gaza. Last month they distoryed several wells because it affet the water supply of Jerusalem. Any sane country will never let it water be controlled by it neighbour and that goes to India and Pakistan, 400 million depend on this region, Kashmir and Northern territories, for their water during the long dry season and in an age of global warming with rain below average for several years, these abandoned areas are even more imortant.
 
Al-Jassas
Back to Top
pikeshot1600 View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar


Joined: 22-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4221
  Quote pikeshot1600 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Apr-2008 at 00:56
There seems to be some reluctance to acknowledge that the battlegrounds of the 21st century may well be wherever the most basic resources are to be found:
 
Oil; water; minerals to keep industrial output going; food (re: riots over food prices due to shortages), etc.
 
The long understood conventional wisdom that advancement has to be based on industrialization, and the "progress" of health and nutrition in increasing population are going to have to be reconciled with the conflicts resulting from finite resources and from the increasingly dangerous carbon effect of modern life.
 
It is gonna be a tough century.
 
 
Back to Top
Seko View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar
Spammer

Joined: 01-Sep-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8595
  Quote Seko Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Apr-2008 at 01:00
You are most likely 100% correct in your predictions Pikeshot. There has got to be a way we could get you on CNN or other news channels to talk some sense into the rest of the masses. I would watch.
Back to Top
pikeshot1600 View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar


Joined: 22-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4221
  Quote pikeshot1600 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Apr-2008 at 02:10
Me on CNN....I don't think so.  They have Katie Couric coming aboard I hear.  Big%20smile   I have no credentials and no standing, so that is a non starter. 
 
These things cannot be talked about openly anyway.  It isn't fashionable to discuss such issues, and there are no votes to be gained, so it becomes a series of puzzling news stories that get disseminated on YouTube.  That may be the only way the next generation will get to know about it since they don't read newspapers or much other print media anymore.
 
The auditorium for these knotty issues is in the war colleges and the back rooms of foreign offices.  Those two groups don't often get along, and the media in general have made it unacceptable that a professional military person should lose his life over anything, much less a conflict concerning state interests. 
 
I am at a loss on this one. 
 
  


Edited by pikeshot1600 - 16-Apr-2008 at 02:31
Back to Top
Workhorse 61 View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 17-Apr-2008
Location: Tampa Fl
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote Workhorse 61 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-May-2008 at 02:26

I think Pikeshot is on time and on target with his predictions.  We have made a whole doctrine out of rivers and seas and the littoral areas.  Be forwarned though, it reads like stereo instructions! 

I have to be careful when I talk about the media.  I have this annoying tendancy to get up on my soapbox and not get down for a while.  I agree with Pikeshot (again) that the media has made it unacceptable that we should lose our life over anything.  They don't realize that we do not kill and die for Mom, Apple Pie, Chevrolet, and Baseball.  We do it for the man on our left and right.  I guess the concept is foreign to them.
"Ultima Ratio Regnum"
The Ultimate Argument of Kings
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-May-2008 at 06:47
The media is disinterested either way. They exist to make a profit, if the story that sells is "the tragic loss of life" thats what is put up, if its about "brothers in arms" yeah thats whats going to be on.
 
 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.