The mainstream scholars accept that Illyrians and Dacians retreated into the mountains upon the Slavic incursions to reemerge in the 11th century as Vlachs and Albanians.
Which "mainstream" scholars? Why this would be the Main Stream?Arent you abusing a little?
However, in recent years Yugoslav archaeology has confirmed that there isn't a uniform "Illyrian" identity but a number of different cultures loosely united under the authority of the Illyrian kings.
What would that mean? The ancient greeks, were they united? Of course, in such a big territory, and with all the several tribes aiming to build military alliances, there would be differences in culture. But surely, those called illyrians (Illyrii Proprie Dicti) were of the same stock. And they lived in the southernmost part of illyria, southwards modern bosnia lets say.
The tribe Dalmatae for example, though classed as Illyrian based on linguistic evidence, defected very shortly from the main Illyrian kingdom as soon as the latter run into trouble and King Gentis or Gentius could not enforce his authority. The great debate of today is about whether the proven cultural variation in today's Bosnia, Serbia, Dalmatian Coast, Croatia, and Albania should also be classified as to correspond to ethnic variation as well. The biggest stumbling block is the complete lack of any sources that testify to the ancient Illyrian language. Without this conclusive linguistic evidence most of our discussions will remain SPECULATIVE.
Hey, re-read what you wrote. You are being a little controversial. Linguistic evidence to classify Dalmatian Illyrians? Which linguistic evidence?
As regarding to illyrian, there are words inherited from that language. But yes, they are few, not enough to prove it all. There exist also a common pre-latin vocabulary in Romanian and Albanian. And again, linguistic is not sufficient in this case, archaeology says more. There are no proofs of cultural interruption in archaeological finds in albanian territory.
So, Arber Z you are speculating about the identity of modern Albanians.
Read my previous post, and tell me please where did I speculate?I wasnt even arguing about any possible relation between Illyrians and Albanians.
Unless you have conclusive evidence to the opposite besides geographic identification (the fact that modern Albanians live today in part of what used to be Illyria). This in itself is not sufficient to prove the "Illyrianism" of Albanians but, of course, doen't counter it either. So at the moment we're kind of stuck in the middle.
History is not an exact science, dear Constantine
Take care!