Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Augustine Principate

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Balaam View Drop Down
Housecarl
Housecarl

Suspended

Joined: 12-Oct-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1286
  Quote Balaam Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Augustine Principate
    Posted: 29-Nov-2006 at 04:52
What was the importance of Augustus to the Empire?

What reforms did he initiate?

Were there any negative aspects of his rule?

How did he benefit the people?

What were his achievements?

Was Augustus the savior of Rome?

Was Augustus the archietecht of Rome?
Back to Top
konstantinius View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 762
  Quote konstantinius Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Nov-2006 at 20:17
this is my personal oppinion

1) Augustus came to provide strong and effective goverment at the end of a turbulent era. He revitalized Roman society by curbing corruption, opening up the society of Rome to the equites, and removing the army from politics and the influence of strong-men. He laid the administrative basis for a long-lasting Empire.

2) Besides the above, he initiated a massive program of public building leaving behind such lasting pieces as the new Forum, the Theatre of Marcellus and the Pantheon (built by Agrippa).

3) Probably. But not bad enough to enter the record. His was on overall successful and popular principate.

4) provided peace after a long period of wars, benefited roman middle classes and the equites, improved squalid conditions of Roman poor, stream-lined the administration and bureucracy, curbed corruption.

5) It has been covered sufficiently above.

6) Savior from whom?

7) Not the sole one, definetely one of the most important.
" I do disagree with what you say but I'll defend to my death your right to do so."
Back to Top
Leonardo View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jan-2006
Location: Italy
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 778
  Quote Leonardo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Nov-2006 at 22:46
I can add a long lasting consequence of Augustus policy, the extension of Italy to the "natural" border of the Alps and its subdivison in 11 regions:


   
Back to Top
Decebal View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Digital Prometheus

Joined: 20-May-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1791
  Quote Decebal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Nov-2006 at 07:19
I would like to refer people to read the "common features of major human institutions" thread (in the same section as this one). If indeed the modern state, Catholic church and corporation are all derived from the structure of the Roman Empire, then Augustus, as one of the (if not the one) main architects of the imperial structure, becomes one of the greatest, most influential men in history, even more so than he is usually given credit to.
What is history but a fable agreed upon?
Napoleon Bonaparte

Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.- Mohandas Gandhi

Back to Top
kilroy View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar
AE Editor

Joined: 10-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 482
  Quote kilroy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Nov-2006 at 11:17
Augustus brought peace within the war torn Empire that Rome became.  He stopped the civil wars and brought with him effective government and programs.
 
I'll start with some of the building programs he started.  As mentioned, he built the theatre of Marellus in 13 BCE, which was the largest in Rome.  He also renovated the theatre of Pompey, and he also built the theatre of Apollo.  He expanded the water system, and built two new aquaducts in Rome, the Aqua Julia and Aqua Virgo.  He renovated over 100 temples (supposibly 82 in one year alone).  He had the Horologrium (spelling?) built, which was essentially a big sun dial.  And he expanded the roadways. 
 
A couple more things would be the fact that he reformed the army in a major way.  He organized a professional branch for the Navy.  He created the praetorian guard (debateable whether this is good or not).  He also was given the Eagles lost during Crassus' Parthian campaign by the Parthians. 
 
On the civil front, he created a company of 3,500 professional firefighters under a fire chief.  He also used much of his own money to fund some of the building projects, and gave money to the state when it needed it.  For example, if you read Augustus's Res Gestae Divi Augusti he mentions buying grain for the state, giving money to towns so his troops could settle on land.  He also gave money to all of his soldiers (praetorian and legionaries alike) after he died (in his will). 
 
The Equite class benifited greatly from the reign of Augustus, they were offered new offices, specifically for the equite class, such as commands in the praetorian guard, fire chief and other provincal offices, such as keeping track of the grain coming from Egypt. 
 
As for the plebian class (lower class), one of the major problems he faced was the lack of farm land in Italy.  He offered them land over sea for farming.  He also kept a steady flow of free grain for the Roman poor within the city of Rome itself (sometimes even buying it for them himself).  And of course, the creation of the new firefighter company helped poorer folks put out the flames instead of having the whole block turn out with buckets.  He made sure that the poorer class always had food on festival days, by food distributions. 
 
He promoted writers such as Vergil, Propertius, Tibullius, Horace, Ovid (until ovid pissed him off) among others and they wrote many master pieces that we still read today, including Vergils Aeneid.  Although a con would be all of the writing (most of it) was state controlled and some propaganda. 
 
Another important point was the problem of succession.  When he died, he knew there may be problems with who would become the next 'leading citizen' (IE Emperor or Princep if you prefer).  He figured that if the Senate simply chose another Princep, civil war might very well errupt again.  He figured someone (a general perhaps) might challenge the Senates choice and wage war again.  Augustus also thought that if Rome returned to the old republican method of government, corruption would take over again and civil war etc.  So he figured, that if he choose the successor, and invested a capable person into the office, he could avoid this, and thats what happened.  This seemed to have worked in the case of Tiberius since there was no major civil war.  This broke down after a while. 
 
A con i suppose would be his reforms to the justice system.  While many civil cases were brought before judges (see my post on praetors).  All high level cases were brought before him.  He reduced praetors down to mere imperial administrators. 
Kilroy was here.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.