Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Baloochistan Posted: 02-Sep-2006 at 05:42 |
Recently Bugti the popular leader of the Baloochistan was killed by the Pakistani military which led to widespread riots against the pakistani government. I belive have something like an independence movement of something. These people seem to be very old culture, as appears on the net.
What exactly are the baloochi people fighting for ? what do they want ? Why was Bugti killed ?
Anoybody got more information to thrrow some light on this subject ?
Are their any baloochis in our forum ?
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
 |
malizai_
Sultan
Alcinous
Joined: 05-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2252
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Sep-2006 at 08:45 |
Gharanai is a baluchi
|
 |
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Sep-2006 at 08:48 |
The Balochis want nothing really except development, but the Sardars want to fill their own pocket.
|
 |
Cyrus Shahmiri
Administrator
King of Kings
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Iran
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6240
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Sep-2006 at 09:10 |
Iran has also a large Baluchi population, in fact Baluchis are an Iranian people and Baluchistan has been always part of Iran.
|
|
 |
Leonidas
Tsar
Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Sep-2006 at 09:46 |
alot of issues would of been buried, if there was atleast some decent autonomy granted and it resources wasnt pilfered the way they are now.
I also tend to agree with cyrus, i think of the baluchi as iranians.
|
|
 |
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Sep-2006 at 11:39 |
Balochistan has as much autonomy as the all the other provinces. 50 % of the population of balochistan are not even balochi, they are pashtun, and 10 % are makranis. That leaves 40 % of the population who are Balochis. And many baloch live in the Punjab (granted still in the small sliver west of the Indus).
The Baloch are part and parcel of pakistan, there has been a Baloch President (leghari) and and two pm's (jamali and Mazari). Pakistan's leading strategic analyst is an ethnic Balochi; Dr Shireeen Mazari.
|
 |
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Sep-2006 at 02:02 |
Originally posted by Cyrus Shahmiri
Iran has also a large Baluchi population, in fact Baluchis are an Iranian people and Baluchistan has been always part of Iran. |
Hisorically it seems to be true, than why the present position. Geographical continuity also supports this.
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
 |
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Sep-2006 at 02:04 |
And what about the Brahuis ? If everything is OK, why the civil disturbance ?
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
 |
Omar al Hashim
King
Suspended
Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Sep-2006 at 04:59 |
Originally posted by Cyrus
Iran has also a large Baluchi population, in fact Baluchis are an
Iranian people and Baluchistan has been always part of Iran. |
Baluchis are usually completely or semi-independent.
Originally posted by Vivek
If everything is OK, why the civil disturbance ? |
Can we blame India, Israel or America? If not I may have to find out a real reason
Edited by Omar al Hashim - 04-Sep-2006 at 05:00
|
 |
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Sep-2006 at 05:09 |
Who would be included in this "We". Are you paki by any chance. I doubt.
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
 |
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Sep-2006 at 05:55 |
Use the word "Paki" again at you own risk.
Anyways the insurgency (if it ever was one) is winding down.
Two tribes get pissed off (out of 63) and the media blows it out of all proportion.
Edited by Sparten - 04-Sep-2006 at 05:56
|
 |
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Sep-2006 at 06:54 |
Why ? Is it any offensive comment ? If it is I am sorry. I thought of it as a shortform of the long word pakistani, just like the word indo or brit or thai or arbi. If it is indeed offensive please let me know something about it. So that I can be carefull in future.
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
 |
TeldeInduz
General
Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Sep-2006 at 07:02 |
Leonidas,
How can Balochistan's resources be pilfered away by their own country? Balochistan is an integral part of Pakistan.
Cyrus,
Eastern Balochistan has been part of Mohenhendra, Afghan, Iranian and of course Mughal Empires. The Western part I think has been part of Persian Empires. Bakkar Buthi is a Harrapan site from the Kulli-Harrapa period. Before this period (ie before Mohejendra), the archeology does suggest Iranian influences and also Afghan ones. There is some Londo pottery that was discovered after this time which could be Makran or from the West (Iran). I think basically that Iran or Persia, Afghanistan and Harrapan (which I'll call Pakistan to be clear) as well as subsequent Islamic conquerors have occupied Eastern Balochistan.
Edited by TeldeInduz - 04-Sep-2006 at 07:05
|
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
|
 |
Anujkhamar
Chieftain
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1027
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Sep-2006 at 07:09 |
In western countries "Paki" is used as an insult. The word itself is harmless, but the context it is used in western countries isn't.
It is similar for me calling you a leaf. The word is harmless, but then again i could be insulting you by calling you a leaf.
|
 |
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Sep-2006 at 09:04 |
Originally posted by Vivek Sharma
Why ? Is it any offensive comment ? If it is I am sorry. I thought of it as a shortform of the long word pakistani, just like the word indo or brit or thai or arbi. If it is indeed offensive please let me know something about it. So that I can be carefull in future. |
Okay, I apologize, I thought you were using it insultingly.
As for balochistan and Bugti its quite now and has been for sevaral days.
|
 |
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 05-Sep-2006 at 01:03 |
Originally posted by TeldeInduz
Leonidas,
How can Balochistan's resources be pilfered away by their own country? Balochistan is an integral part of Pakistan.
Cyrus,
Eastern Balochistan has been part of Mohenhendra, Afghan, Iranian and of course Mughal Empires. The Western part I think has been part of Persian Empires. Bakkar Buthi is a Harrapan site from the Kulli-Harrapa period. Before this period (ie before Mohejendra), the archeology does suggest Iranian influences and also Afghan ones. There is some Londo pottery that was discovered after this time which could be Makran or from the West (Iran). I think basically that Iran or Persia, Afghanistan and Harrapan (which I'll call Pakistan to be clear) as well as subsequent Islamic conquerors have occupied Eastern Balochistan. |
It may not be pilfered out of the country, but to other parts like punjab that's what the baloochis say i belive.
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
 |
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 05-Sep-2006 at 01:04 |
The harappan & Mohenjodaro cultures that are being talked about are clearly vedic, hindu cultures, no relation to iran as can be made out from their gods & Godesses who are hindu
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
 |
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 05-Sep-2006 at 01:06 |
Originally posted by Anujkhamar
In western countries "Paki" is used as an insult. The word itself is harmless, but the context it is used in western countries isn't.
It is similar for me calling you a leaf. The word is harmless, but then again i could be insulting you by calling you a leaf.
|
We are not brits or westerners, its time we defined our own notions of good or bad. We dont need the colonial hangover after more than half a century. By the way what does a 'leaf' mean. Pure curiosity
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
 |
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 05-Sep-2006 at 01:11 |
So far as I understand, paki should be considered a holy word. Pak means pure, holy, so paki would mean from the holy or from the pure. Nothing whose progenitor is holy or pure can be bad. I wonder if any of the westerners who use the word paki insultingly know its meaning. Most of them know only one language, whereas most of us knowing multiple languages have the knowledge to appreciate all of them.
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
 |
Omar al Hashim
King
Suspended
Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 05-Sep-2006 at 05:21 |
Originally posted by Vivek
Who would be included in this "We". Are you paki by any chance. I doubt. |
Oh man, don't ask me about my use of pronouns. I use whichever one
feels right at the time, often changing the one I use mid sentence.
Most people are either one of "Us" or one of "Them". Often I'm both. I have no idea what my ethnic idenity is.
I'm a anglo-celtic-gilani-arab-baluchi-muhajir-pakistani-australian. In
addition I'm also related through aunts & uncles to indians,
iraqis, south-africans, latvians, italians, russians, canadians,
americans.
That particular 'we' was my paki side (I have never consider paki to be
an insult, I never even knew it was before coming here. All of my
family use it when we can't be bothered saying 'Pakistani'.)
Edited by Omar al Hashim - 05-Sep-2006 at 05:21
|
 |