Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

The Kargil Conflict

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>
Author
Vivek Sharma View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote Vivek Sharma Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The Kargil Conflict
    Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 05:29
Dear Mr. AP Singh,

Telde is right. The Indians & pakistanis are two distinct genes. The British were very scientifc people. In 1947, they foresaw that indians & pakistanis need to be separated  as much as possible. So they altered the genetic make of the whole population of the indian subcontinent.

Another thing is that you have always claimed about the existence of Gurjars on the other side of the border, still sharing the same family names & history. But the historian in You is overlooking the scientist possibly, since you forget to mention that although they look same, have same names, history etc..., they now have a different gnetic make up than the Indian Gurjars, thanks to the 47 event.

PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
Back to Top
TeldeInduz View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
  Quote TeldeInduz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 06:07

it's a known fact that genetics either side of the Indo Pak border differ due to the location of the Sarawasti River. The British divided up India based on two nation theory..what's this based on? You got it, RELIGION. Now read your texts, the land of Arrata, the Vahikas these are Pakistan and they were the lands of Vedic apostates from Hinduism. Culturally the place was different from Gangetic plains, and it was stated in the Mahabharata that noone should go to the Vahika lands and mingle in. That probably is what caused the genetic difference across the border, and it's quite clear, science has proved it. The British divided it on religion, which happened to be a good genetic basis also. The border is natural and permanent, as  is the Durand line (perhaps not so genetically as the Eastern border, though historically and legally very natural.)



Edited by TeldeInduz - 18-Sep-2006 at 06:10
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
Back to Top
Vivek Sharma View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote Vivek Sharma Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 06:26
Dont get panicky. I agree with you. The thousands of years old family has to always agree to everything a 50 year young breakaway member says. To bring him back to his roots. 
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
Back to Top
TeldeInduz View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
  Quote TeldeInduz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 06:28
Lol!! It's not possible to take on board. East and west of the Sarawasti have never got on. It's historically recorded all in the Mahabharata - In fact it's just starting to come to me just how natural a state Pakistan is based on history, genetics and culture.

Edited by TeldeInduz - 18-Sep-2006 at 06:30
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 06:57
Hi,
I dont know whether TeldeInduz is from Pakistan or not but if he is then he should fight to divide the Pakistan further on the basis of the genetic differences of the various people living there. I am sure he would not be allowed.
 
In India we hate to be divided on these lines.
 
In practical life also during a war with Pakistan the army of both sides face a problem in indentifying the people since this side of Punjab and its people are same as the other side of Punjab. Similar situation is there at Rajasthan border.
Back to Top
TeldeInduz View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
  Quote TeldeInduz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 07:02
Dividing Pak up further wont make much difference. The big genetic differences are where the Sarawasti River is. Punjab is a difficut one, but I believe the Sarawasti ran through the middle of it, so it is perhaps also not a bad marker. But I'll agree Punjab should be fully incorporated into Pakistan and then that would be an even better natural border.
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 07:02
Originally posted by Vivek Sharma

Dear Mr. AP Singh,

Telde is right. The Indians & pakistanis are two distinct genes. The British were very scientifc people. In 1947, they foresaw that indians & pakistanis need to be separated  as much as possible. So they altered the genetic make of the whole population of the indian subcontinent.

Another thing is that you have always claimed about the existence of Gurjars on the other side of the border, still sharing the same family names & history. But the historian in You is overlooking the scientist possibly, since you forget to mention that although they look same, have same names, history etc..., they now have a different gnetic make up than the Indian Gurjars, thanks to the 47 event.

 
Dear Sharmajee,
 
Even Jaspal Bhatti (The famous Punjabi comedian who has a very different style to express things) would not have expressed in a better style.
 
Regards.
AP singh
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 07:04
Originally posted by TeldeInduz

Dividing Pak up further wont make much difference. The big genetic differences are where the Sarawasti River is. Punjab is a difficut one, but I believe the Sarawasti ran through the middle of it, so it is perhaps also not a bad marker. But I'll agree Punjab should be fully incorporated into Pakistan and then that would be an even better natural border.
 
But why Saraswati for that matter. How many rivers flows through Pakistan. Based on this logic the people living on both sides of the banks of these rivers should have genetic differences and should be further divided.
 
If Punjab can be incorporated into Punjab of Pakistan ( Since it was divided) , why Pakistan can not be incorporated in India?


Edited by AP Singh - 18-Sep-2006 at 07:07
Back to Top
Vivek Sharma View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote Vivek Sharma Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 07:30
Originally posted by AP Singh

Originally posted by TeldeInduz

Dividing Pak up further wont make much difference. The big genetic differences are where the Sarawasti River is. Punjab is a difficut one, but I believe the Sarawasti ran through the middle of it, so it is perhaps also not a bad marker. But I'll agree Punjab should be fully incorporated into Pakistan and then that would be an even better natural border.
 
But why Saraswati for that matter. How many rivers flows through Pakistan. Based on this logic the people living on both sides of the banks of these rivers should have genetic differences and should be further divided.
 
If Punjab can be incorporated into Punjab of Pakistan ( Since it was divided) , why Pakistan can not be incorporated in India?



You are right Mr. Singh, telde has himself said earlier that the position on the sides of the durand line is also same, He will aslo agree with you on this river thing, To the north of these rivers is NWFP, which is of course very different genetically from the punjabi paki. There genetic make up is more aligned to the Afghans, thats what they are & as soon as the Afghan nation becomes more stable &they get some time (it will very shortly with help from the West, US & India ), they will come back to work on the unification of two genetically similiar people spread on both sides of the durand line.

To the south west of these rivers lies baloochistan, whose people had realised even before telde that they had a different genetic make up from the pakistanis, as they were staying on that side of the rivers, That's why they started their freedom struggle for independence from Pakistan,


If you look at sindhis closely, you will see that they are the most genetically different from this entire lot. Just a cursory glance at their physiques & appearance can make that out. They had also relaised long back this genetic difference & there were moveents for their independence, till they decided that it was better first to take advantage of the resources of the Punjab & develop Karachi into a world class city & Sindh into an economic powerhouse before going for full freedom.

PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
Back to Top
TeldeInduz View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
  Quote TeldeInduz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 07:36
Originally posted by AP Singh

Originally posted by TeldeInduz

Dividing Pak up further wont make much difference. The big genetic differences are where the Sarawasti River is. Punjab is a difficut one, but I believe the Sarawasti ran through the middle of it, so it is perhaps also not a bad marker. But I'll agree Punjab should be fully incorporated into Pakistan and then that would be an even better natural border.
 
But why Saraswati for that matter. How many rivers flows through Pakistan. Based on this logic the people living on both sides of the banks of these rivers should have genetic differences and should be further divided.
 
They do. But not as much as the Sarawasti River.
 
If Punjab can be incorporated into Punjab of Pakistan ( Since it was divided) , why Pakistan can not be incorporated in India?
 
Punjab is the "land of 5 rivers" - belongs to the Indus plains.
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 07:41
One of my friend who is Chechi Gujjar ( The gotra of Prithvi Raj Chauhan) from from Swat, N.W.F.P., has informed that there are more than 50,00,000 gujors in N.W.F.P alone. In Punjab Pakistan there is a huge population of Gujors thats why in punjabi film industry every fifth film is about gujors.

These Gujjars were there since tenth century and still share the same Gotras with us. They are not Mahajirs who went there after 1947 but were ruling that area since the days of Imperial Gujjar Pratihars.
 
The gotra of the rulers of SWAT was Rex which is also found in Delhi among Gujjars.
Back to Top
Vivek Sharma View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote Vivek Sharma Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 07:41
Punjab is a new creation, the original termbeing Saptasindhu, the land of seven rivers, which agrees to what he has stated.
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
Back to Top
TeldeInduz View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
  Quote TeldeInduz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 07:50
Originally posted by Vivek Sharma

Originally posted by AP Singh

Originally posted by TeldeInduz

Dividing Pak up further wont make much difference. The big genetic differences are where the Sarawasti River is. Punjab is a difficut one, but I believe the Sarawasti ran through the middle of it, so it is perhaps also not a bad marker. But I'll agree Punjab should be fully incorporated into Pakistan and then that would be an even better natural border.
 
But why Saraswati for that matter. How many rivers flows through Pakistan. Based on this logic the people living on both sides of the banks of these rivers should have genetic differences and should be further divided.
 
If Punjab can be incorporated into Punjab of Pakistan ( Since it was divided) , why Pakistan can not be incorporated in India?



You are right Mr. Singh, telde has himself said earlier that the position on the sides of the durand line is also same, He will aslo agree with you on this river thing, To the north of these rivers is NWFP, which is of course very different genetically from the punjabi paki. There genetic make up is more aligned to the Afghans, thats what they are & as soon as the Afghan nation becomes more stable &they get some time (it will very shortly with help from the West, US & India ), they will come back to work on the unification of two genetically similiar people spread on both sides of the durand line.

To the south west of these rivers lies baloochistan, whose people had realised even before telde that they had a different genetic make up from the pakistanis, as they were staying on that side of the rivers, That's why they started their freedom struggle for independence from Pakistan,


If you look at sindhis closely, you will see that they are the most genetically different from this entire lot. Just a cursory glance at their physiques & appearance can make that out. They had also relaised long back this genetic difference & there were moveents for their independence, till they decided that it was better first to take advantage of the resources of the Punjab & develop Karachi into a world class city & Sindh into an economic powerhouse before going for full freedom.

 
There are differences between Pathans and Punjabis but only because Pathans moved into frontier regions at a later date. It's really only in the last 500 years to 1000 years that Pathans have been living in those areas.
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 08:03
Hi Vivek,
This River bank theory reminds me of one documentary film on birds (Hans) I have seen. Most of the animals also ( Except a few like dogs) dont mate with their sisters or cousin sisters like these birds. As per the documentary film these birds were not breeding at all since they all were brought up at the same  bank of the River. So what the Scientists did, they divided  these birds in to two groups and half of them were sent to other bank of the river. The breeding of these birds was possible only when males of one bank of the river mated by with females of the other bank of the river since they did not know that they are brothers and sisters. 
Back to Top
Vivek Sharma View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote Vivek Sharma Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 08:31
Well Said. BTW brother Telde is a Pakistani based in paraguay on AE.
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
Back to Top
maqsad View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 25-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 928
  Quote maqsad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 18:58
Originally posted by Vivek Sharma

Punjab is a new creation, the original termbeing Saptasindhu, the land of seven rivers, which agrees to what he has stated.


Panjab is just some leftover persian word. It might as well be purged now but like knock knees, once you got it its next to impossible to get rid of it. Maybe if paki panjab was knocked into 3 or 4 pieces it could happen?
Back to Top
TeldeInduz View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
  Quote TeldeInduz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 20:16
They're considering it.
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
Back to Top
maqsad View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 25-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 928
  Quote maqsad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 21:46
Originally posted by AP Singh

Hi Vivek,
This River bank theory reminds me of one documentary film on birds (Hans) I have seen. Most of the animals also ( Except a few like dogs) dont mate with their sisters or cousin sisters like these birds. As per the documentary film these birds were not breeding at all since they all were brought up at the same  bank of the River. So what the Scientists did, they divided  these birds in to two groups and half of them were sent to other bank of the river. The breeding of these birds was possible only when males of one bank of the river mated by with females of the other bank of the river since they did not know that they are brothers and sisters. 


How do you distinguish a gujjar from a regular pathan and a regular panjabi that they live amongst?
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Sep-2006 at 09:42
I live in an area where we dont have Pathans. Among Punjabis there are Gujjars also and we can not disginguish between them untill we are specifically told by them.
 
I read somewhere that the word Pathan was used  for various different tribes living behind the hills and they were indentified by the names of the hill they were living behind and not by the name of their tribe.
Back to Top
maqsad View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 25-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 928
  Quote maqsad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Sep-2006 at 02:51
When I was a kid I thought pathan just meant "kidnapper" for a while. Some people use it in that context in to scare little kids into not leaving the house and roaming around. Confused
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.157 seconds.