Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

The Kargil Conflict

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
Author
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The Kargil Conflict
    Posted: 20-Sep-2006 at 21:35
It is this post. For Creation of a rajput the horse is not required. I am getting confused with this kind of History

Lol!! I totally agree with you. Thats the funniest thing I've seen in a while!

(btw, your formatting is a bit off you may wish to fix that)
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Sep-2006 at 06:17
BTW the horses were not successful in Kargil conflict ( It was not a war). The cross breed of Horse and Donkey ( Khachchar) was used to carry heavy material to those heights where Pakistanis were holed up in well prepared bunkers.
 
 
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Sep-2006 at 05:51

 
It is this post. For Creation of a rajput the horse is not required. I am getting confused with this kind of History.
 
Edited by Rajput - 02 August 2006 at 3:53pm


If God did not create the horse, he would not have created the Rajput.



Edited by AP Singh - 20-Sep-2006 at 05:53
Back to Top
Vivek Sharma View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote Vivek Sharma Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Sep-2006 at 05:34
I did'nt get it either. On which thread was it posted & in what context.

BTW I had forgotten the that surrender tactic. It is good. Only if the dead paki soldiers in kargill had remembered this, they would have escaped certain death.


I say death, because contrary to the Indian traditions, where even POW are treated like guests, our very much younger, forlorn brother  does'nt even  have the courtsey  to admit its brave dead soldiers as its own, for fear of having to admit it's hand in the war.

Although I must admit one good strategy they used in kargill. To send the Brave Afghans to fight, so that when the dead bodies start arriving, they would go to NWFP, which is used to seeing the dead bodies, as opposed to the Punjab, where any dead bodies arriving in such huge nos. would have led to another coup by another dictator.

Another benefit of sending the Afghans to the front in kargill was that the Afghans were at least able to get some initial gains due to their fighting skills as opposed to the politically dominant rich punjabi soldiers, who hardly know how to fight & have let down their country everytime they have been sent to war. The Afghans, true to their valiant traditions, saved some face for the country again.
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Sep-2006 at 05:15
I dont understand how the birth of rajputs are related to horses as somebody posted in this tread. 


Edited by AP Singh - 20-Sep-2006 at 05:27
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Sep-2006 at 05:10
No,
 
This is a simple military tactics to be prepared for next war. In the next war the surrender will be much easier since the oppossing army will assume that they will be treated well if captured and would not show much of resistance to surrender, otherwise they would prefer to die than surrendering.
Back to Top
Vivek Sharma View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote Vivek Sharma Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Sep-2006 at 05:00
You are right, the resentment was also just.

But then we are Indians & there is something like Indian Chivalry (I wish it did'nt exist) & ethics whose tradition we have to keep maybe just for the sake of continuity. knowing fully well that we have had to pay a very heavy price for this whether it be Prithviraj Chauhan releasing a defeated tyrannt from captivity or General Aurora having pity on the poor paki soldiers.


PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Sep-2006 at 04:42

From Indian side Lt. General Arora was negotiating with General Niazi for his surrender and I believe both of them were schoolmate at Deharadun. Later the deal was completely honoured and the Surrendered pakistani army was given a very good treatment like good food etc. In a country like India where there were lot people living under poverty line that time this decision of Govt. of India was resented by many people since POWs were getting better food than the ordinary Indian citizen.

Back to Top
Vivek Sharma View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote Vivek Sharma Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Sep-2006 at 04:23
Originally posted by AP Singh

In Delhi I have seen many Pathans earlier selling herbal medicines (equivalent to Viagra ( before the invention of Viagra ofcourse now they are out of business) in very provocative and unparliamentray but humorous language and I thought that is the actual profession of Pathans. But that was due to my poor knowlegde about them.
 
Now I came to know through website that Imran Khan is also a pathan. I remember one of his interview after the Pakistani cricket team beaten team India captained by Sunil Gavaskar in Pakistan. He told firmly that he want to beat team cricket India in India and he has done that in the very next series. What a great cricketer. In his recent interview to India TV he advocated for strong friendly relationship between India and pakistan.  Through this website I came to know that he is Niaji Pathan and immedaitely struck to my mind the name of another Niaji Pathan, the General Niaji who surrendered with more one lakhs of his troops in 1971 war to the Indian army.



Your memory is brilliant & so must be your timing when you bat in cricket.

Another thing I remember from that war was that this pathan general  Niazi was not willing to surrender. His talks with his counterparts in Western Pakistan on radio, which were also heard by the Indian interceptors, reveal that he was afraid that the whole pak army would be slaughtered by bangladeshis, who were furious at the tyranny which the pak soldiers had committed on them. (More than 3000 bengali muslim women were found as rape victims, being used as sex slaves in the bunkers of the Pak army) He was  exhorting the western pakistanis to launch a naval attack on bangladesh to save the trapped & defeated pak army & when it was pointed out to him that it would be impossible for Pak navy to even get beyond Bombay, he pleaded with them to pressure USA to attack India with their seventh fleet, which was positioned nearby.

When the Indian commander was told about this, he himself took the radio & talked to Niazi that the match was over & he would treat the pak army as the winning team treats a loosing team in any match. (Niazi & the Indian commander had previously played for the same Hockey team) He was also told that the surrender was the better option out for him, the other being slaughtered by the Inidan army.

When Niazi heard this from one of his closest past friends, he decided to surrender. Rest is history.
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Sep-2006 at 03:30
In Delhi I have seen many Pathans earlier selling herbal medicines (equivalent to Viagra ( before the invention of Viagra ofcourse now they are out of business) in very provocative and unparliamentray but humorous language and I thought that is the actual profession of Pathans. But that was due to my poor knowlegde about them.
 
Now I came to know through website that Imran Khan is also a pathan. I remember one of his interview after the Pakistani cricket team beaten team India captained by Sunil Gavaskar in Pakistan. He told firmly that he want to beat team cricket India in India and he has done that in the very next series. What a great cricketer. In his recent interview to India TV he advocated for strong friendly relationship between India and pakistan.  Through this website I came to know that he is Niaji Pathan and immedaitely struck to my mind the name of another Niaji Pathan, the General Niaji who surrendered with more one lakhs of his troops in 1971 war to the Indian army.
Back to Top
Vivek Sharma View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote Vivek Sharma Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Sep-2006 at 02:59
Originally posted by maqsad

When I was a kid I thought pathan just meant "kidnapper" for a while. Some people use it in that context in to scare little kids into not leaving the house and roaming around. Confused


Interesting, when I was a kid, I thought it meant money grabber, because my parrents used to say If you cry pathans would come & take your gullak (piggybank) away. later I discovered it was because pathans had a great reputation as money collectors, they used to be employed as money or debt collectors.
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
Back to Top
maqsad View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 25-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 928
  Quote maqsad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Sep-2006 at 02:51
When I was a kid I thought pathan just meant "kidnapper" for a while. Some people use it in that context in to scare little kids into not leaving the house and roaming around. Confused
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Sep-2006 at 09:42
I live in an area where we dont have Pathans. Among Punjabis there are Gujjars also and we can not disginguish between them untill we are specifically told by them.
 
I read somewhere that the word Pathan was used  for various different tribes living behind the hills and they were indentified by the names of the hill they were living behind and not by the name of their tribe.
Back to Top
maqsad View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 25-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 928
  Quote maqsad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 21:46
Originally posted by AP Singh

Hi Vivek,
This River bank theory reminds me of one documentary film on birds (Hans) I have seen. Most of the animals also ( Except a few like dogs) dont mate with their sisters or cousin sisters like these birds. As per the documentary film these birds were not breeding at all since they all were brought up at the same  bank of the River. So what the Scientists did, they divided  these birds in to two groups and half of them were sent to other bank of the river. The breeding of these birds was possible only when males of one bank of the river mated by with females of the other bank of the river since they did not know that they are brothers and sisters. 


How do you distinguish a gujjar from a regular pathan and a regular panjabi that they live amongst?
Back to Top
TeldeInduz View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
  Quote TeldeInduz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 20:16
They're considering it.
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
Back to Top
maqsad View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 25-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 928
  Quote maqsad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 18:58
Originally posted by Vivek Sharma

Punjab is a new creation, the original termbeing Saptasindhu, the land of seven rivers, which agrees to what he has stated.


Panjab is just some leftover persian word. It might as well be purged now but like knock knees, once you got it its next to impossible to get rid of it. Maybe if paki panjab was knocked into 3 or 4 pieces it could happen?
Back to Top
Vivek Sharma View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote Vivek Sharma Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 08:31
Well Said. BTW brother Telde is a Pakistani based in paraguay on AE.
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
Back to Top
AP Singh View Drop Down
Earl
Earl


Joined: 05-Sep-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 283
  Quote AP Singh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 08:03
Hi Vivek,
This River bank theory reminds me of one documentary film on birds (Hans) I have seen. Most of the animals also ( Except a few like dogs) dont mate with their sisters or cousin sisters like these birds. As per the documentary film these birds were not breeding at all since they all were brought up at the same  bank of the River. So what the Scientists did, they divided  these birds in to two groups and half of them were sent to other bank of the river. The breeding of these birds was possible only when males of one bank of the river mated by with females of the other bank of the river since they did not know that they are brothers and sisters. 
Back to Top
TeldeInduz View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
  Quote TeldeInduz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 07:50
Originally posted by Vivek Sharma

Originally posted by AP Singh

Originally posted by TeldeInduz

Dividing Pak up further wont make much difference. The big genetic differences are where the Sarawasti River is. Punjab is a difficut one, but I believe the Sarawasti ran through the middle of it, so it is perhaps also not a bad marker. But I'll agree Punjab should be fully incorporated into Pakistan and then that would be an even better natural border.
 
But why Saraswati for that matter. How many rivers flows through Pakistan. Based on this logic the people living on both sides of the banks of these rivers should have genetic differences and should be further divided.
 
If Punjab can be incorporated into Punjab of Pakistan ( Since it was divided) , why Pakistan can not be incorporated in India?



You are right Mr. Singh, telde has himself said earlier that the position on the sides of the durand line is also same, He will aslo agree with you on this river thing, To the north of these rivers is NWFP, which is of course very different genetically from the punjabi paki. There genetic make up is more aligned to the Afghans, thats what they are & as soon as the Afghan nation becomes more stable &they get some time (it will very shortly with help from the West, US & India ), they will come back to work on the unification of two genetically similiar people spread on both sides of the durand line.

To the south west of these rivers lies baloochistan, whose people had realised even before telde that they had a different genetic make up from the pakistanis, as they were staying on that side of the rivers, That's why they started their freedom struggle for independence from Pakistan,


If you look at sindhis closely, you will see that they are the most genetically different from this entire lot. Just a cursory glance at their physiques & appearance can make that out. They had also relaised long back this genetic difference & there were moveents for their independence, till they decided that it was better first to take advantage of the resources of the Punjab & develop Karachi into a world class city & Sindh into an economic powerhouse before going for full freedom.

 
There are differences between Pathans and Punjabis but only because Pathans moved into frontier regions at a later date. It's really only in the last 500 years to 1000 years that Pathans have been living in those areas.
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
Back to Top
Vivek Sharma View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote Vivek Sharma Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 07:41
Punjab is a new creation, the original termbeing Saptasindhu, the land of seven rivers, which agrees to what he has stated.
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.121 seconds.